The diagnostic interview schedule: Its development, evolution, and use

  • John E. Helzer
  • Lee N. Robins
Article

Conclusion

The DIS has been a response to the new opportunities for highly-reliable, large-scale psychiatric diagnostic surveys that arose with the development of well-define diagnostic criteria and fully described algorithms for combining them. Because it has made use of the power of computers to store and combine many bits of data for a given individual, it offers approaches to diagnosis that are flexible enough to serve the current needs of a broad variety of kinds of investigations and, we hope, to meet future needs as algorithms change.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association, Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd edn (DSM-III). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthony JC, Folstein M, Romanoski AJ, Von Korff MR, Nestadt GN, Chahal R, Merchant A, Brown CH, Shapiro S, Kramer M, Gruenberg EM (1985) Comparison of lay diagnostic interview schedule and a standardized psychiatric diagnosis: experience in eastern Baltimore. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42: 667–675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bebbington P, Hurry J, Tennant C, Sturt E, Wing JK (1981) Epidemiology of mental disorders in Camberwell. Psychol Med 11:561–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blashfield RK (1984) The classification of psychopathology: neo-Kraepelinian and quantitative approaches. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for minimal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20: 37–46Google Scholar
  6. Cooper JE (1970) The use of a procedure for standardizing psychiatric diagnosis. In: Hare EH, Wing JK (eds) An international symposium: psychiatric epidemiology. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Dohrenwend BP, Shrout PE, Egri G, Mendelsohn FS (1980) Nonspecific psychological distress and other dimensions of psychopathology: measures for use in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37: 1229–1236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Feighner JP, Robins E, Guze SB, Woodruff RA, Winokur G, Munoz R (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 26: 57–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12: 189–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Grossman JH, Barnett GO, McGuire MT (1971) Evaluation of computer-acquired patient histories. JAMA 215: 1286–1291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Helzer JE (1981) The use of a structured diagnostic interview for routine psychiatric evaluations. J Nerv Merit Dis 169: 45–49Google Scholar
  12. Helzer JE, Robins LN, Croughan JL, Welner A (1981) Renard diagnostic interview: its reliability and procedural validity with physicians and lay interviewers. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38: 393–398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Helzer JE, Robins LN, McEvoy LT, Spitznagel EL,Stoltzman RK, Farmer A, Brockington IF (1985a) A comparison of clinical and DIS diagnoses: physician reexamination of lay interviewed cases in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42: 657–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Helzer JE, Stoltzman RK, Farmer A, Brockington IF, Plesons D, Singerman B, Works J (1985b) Comparing the DIS with a DIS/DSM-III-based physician reevaluation. In: Eaton WW, Kessler LG (eds) Epidemiologic field methods in psychiatry: the NIMH epidemiologic catchment area program, chapt 14. Academic Press, New York pp 285–308Google Scholar
  15. Helzer JE, Spitznagel EL, McEvoy L (1987 a) The predictive validity of lay DIS diagnoses in the general population: a comparison with physician examinersGoogle Scholar
  16. Helzer JE, Canino J, Yeh E-K, Bland RC, Lee CK, Hwu H-G, Newman S (1987b) Alcoholism — North America and Asia: a comparison of population surveys with the DISGoogle Scholar
  17. Herjanic B (1983) Diagnostic interview for children and adolescents (DICA). St. Louis, Missouri, Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of MedicineGoogle Scholar
  18. Hopkinson K, Cox A, Rutter M (1981) Psychiatric interview techniques. III. Naturalistic study: eliciting feelings. Br J Psychiatry 138: 406–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Koran LM (1975 a) The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments. part I. N Engl J Med 293: 642–646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Koran LM (1975b) The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments: part II. N Engl J Med 293: 695–701PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Matarazzo JD (1983) The reliability of psychiatric and psychological diagnosis. Clin Psychol Rev 3: 103–145Google Scholar
  22. Mezzich JE, Fabrega H, Mezzich AC, Coffman GA (1985) International experience with DSM-III. J Nerv Merit Dis 173: 738–741Google Scholar
  23. Regier DA, Myers JK, Kramer M, Robins LN, Blazer DG, Hough RL, Eaton WW, Locke BZ (1984) The NIMH epidemiologic catchment area program: historical context, major objectives, and study population characteristics. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41: 934–941PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Richardson SA, Dohrenwend BS, Klein D (1965) Interviewing its forms and functions. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Robins LN (1985) Epidemiology: reflections on testing the validity of psychiatric interviews. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42: 918–924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Ratcliff KS (1981) National institute of mental health diagnostic interview schedule: its history, characteristics, and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38: 381–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Ratcliff KS, Seyfried W (1982) Validity of the diagnostic interview schedule, version II: DSM-III diagnoses. Psychol Med 12: 855–870PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Robins LN, Wing JK, Helzer JE (1987) Composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI)Google Scholar
  29. Rodgers B, Mann SA (1986) The reliability and validity of PSE assessments by lay interviewers: a national population survey. Psychol Med 16: 689–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Saghir MT (1971) A comparison of some aspects of structured and unstructured psychiatric interviews. Am J Psychiatry 128: 180–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shapiro RW, Stromgren E (1979) The relevance of epidemiological methods, techniques, and findings for biological psychiatry. In: van Praag HM (ed) Handbook for biological psychiatry, part 1. Marcel Dekker Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Spitzer RL, Endicott J (1975) Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia (SADS). 2nd ed. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, November 23, 1975Google Scholar
  33. Spitzer RL, Endicott J (1977) Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia — lifetime version (SADS-L). State Psychiatric Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL (1974) A re-analysis of the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis. Br J Psychiatry 125: 341–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW (1980) Procedural validity: validity of the diagnostic process. In: Kaplan HI, Freedman AM, Sadock BJ (eds) Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, 3rd edn, vol 1. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 1039–1040Google Scholar
  36. Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL, Burdock EI, Hardesty AS (1964) The mental status schedule: rationale reliability and validity. Compr Psychiatry 5: 384–395Google Scholar
  37. Spitzer RL, Endicott J, Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1970) The psychiatric status schedule: a technique for evaluating psychopathology and impairment in role functioning. Arch Gen Psychiatry 23: 41–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Spitzer RL, Endicott J, Robins E (1978) Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 35: 773–782PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Spitznagel EL, Helzer JE (1985) A proposed solution to the base rate problem in the kappa statistic. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42: 725–728PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Srole L, Langner TS, Michael ST, Opler MK, Rennie TAC (1962) Mental health in the metropolis: the midtown Manhattan study, vol I. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Weissman MM, Myers JK, Harding PS (1978) Psychiatric disorders in a US urban community: 1975–76. Am J Psychiatry 134: 459–462Google Scholar
  42. Wheeler DO, White PD, Reed EW, Cohen ME (1950) Neurocirculatory asthenia (anxiety neurosis, effort syndrome, neurasthenia). JAMA 142: 878–888Google Scholar
  43. Wing JK, Cooper JE, Sartorius N (1974) Measurement and classification of psychiatric symptoms. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. World Health Organization (1973) The international pilot study of schizophrenia. WHO GenevaGoogle Scholar
  45. Yu E, Zhang M, Xia Z, Liu WT (1984) Instrument translation in cross-cultural research: issues and dilemmas. Paper presented at the First Symposium on Cross-Cultural Psychiatric Epidemiology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, May 10–12, 1984Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • John E. Helzer
    • 1
  • Lee N. Robins
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations