Prevalence of DSM-III personality disorders in the community

  • James Reich
  • William Yates
  • Mary Nduaguba
Article

Summary

A community sample of adults with a standardized DSM-III, Axis II self-report instrument yielded an age adjusted community prevalence of 11.1% of DSM-111 personality disorders. When those with personality disorders (PDs) (n = 26) were compared to those without personality traits (n = 467) the PD group had less education 14.9 (3.0) years vs 16.5 (3.3) years,p = 0.02) and a greater percentage with difficulty with alcohol (19% vs 0.6%,p = 0.0001). Of those married, more 1 PDs reported marital difficulties (29% vs 3.5%,p = 0.002). There was a trend for the PD group to have longer unemployment (p = 0.07).

Keywords

Public Health Alcohol Personality Trait Community Sample Personality Disorder 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bremer J (1951) A social psychiatric investigation of a small community in Northern Norway. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand [Suppl 62]Google Scholar
  2. Essen-Moller E (1956) Individual traits and morbidity in a Swedish rural population. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand [Suppl 100]Google Scholar
  3. Hurt SW, Hyler SE, Frances A, Clarkin JF, Brent R (1984) Assessing borderline personalitydisorder with a self-report, clinical interview or semi-structured interview. Am J Psychiatry 141: 1228–1231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hyler S, Reider R, Spitzer R (1983) Personality diagnostic questionnaire PDQ. New York State Psychiatric Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Iowa City City Directory (1985) BJ Polk Co, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
  6. Langner TS, Michael ST (1963) Life stress and mental health. The midtown Manhattan study. Collier, Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Leighton AH (1959) My name is Legion: the stirling country study of psychiatric disorder and sociocultural environment. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Livesly WJ, Jackson DN (1986) The internal consistency and factorial structures of behaviors judged to be associated with DSM-III personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry 143: 1473–1474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Merikangas KR, Weissman MM (1986) Epidemiology of DSMIII personality disorders. In: Frances A, Hales RE (eds) American psychiatric association annual review, vol 5. American Psychiatric Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Regier DA, Myers JK, Kramer M, Robins LN, Blazer DG, Hough RL, Eaton WW, Locke BZ (1984) The NIMH epidemiologic catchment area program. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41: 934–941PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Reich J (1985) Instruments measuringDSM-III, Axis II personality disorders. Compr Psychiatry 26: 352–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Reich J (1987a) Sex prevalence of DSM-III personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry 144: 485–495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Reich J (1987b) Instruments measuring DSM-III and DSM-III-R personality disorders. J Pers Dis 1: 220–240Google Scholar
  14. Reich J, Thompson WD (1987) Comparison of psychiatric diagnoses in three populations. Hillside J Clin Psychiatry 9: 36–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Reich J, Yates W, Woolson R (1986) Application to the Kish method of respondent selection to a self-report mail survey. Am J Public Health 76: 206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Weissman MM, Orvaschel H, Irnenberg E, Burke JD, Regier DA (1984) Lifetime prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders in three sites. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41: 949–958PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Reich
    • 1
    • 2
  • William Yates
    • 3
  • Mary Nduaguba
    • 4
  1. 1.Massachusetts Mental Health CenterHarvard UniversityBrockton/West Roxbury
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry 116 A, Brockton VA Medical CenterWorcester Psychiatric Outpatient ClinicBrocktonUSA
  3. 3.University of Iowa College of MedicineUSA
  4. 4.Department of Preventive MedicineUniversity of Iowa College of MedicineUSA

Personalised recommendations