Abstract
A class of Σautomata is considered as a partially ordered set by homomorphism relation. We show first that some classes of automata. e.g., quasiperfect automata, perfect automata and strongly cofinal automata, are lattices, and other classes, e.g., strongly connected automata, cyclic automata and cofinal automata, are not lattices. At the same time, we give algorithms for computing the least upper bound and the greatest lower bound of given two elements in each class which forms a lattice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Bayer. Automorphism Groups and Quotients of Strongly Connected Automata and Monadic Algebras, Rept. no. 204, Dept. of Computer Science. Univ. of Illinois (1966).
G. Birkhoff. Lattice Theory, Providence, RI.AMS (1967).
S. Eilenberg. Automata, Languages and Machines, Vol. B, Academic Press (1976).
A. C. Fleck. Isomorphism Groups of Automata,J. ACM 9, 469–476 (1962).
A. C. Fleck. On the Automorphism Group of an Automaton.J. ACM 12, 566–569 (1965).
A. Ginzburg. Algebraic Theory of Automata. Academic Press (1968).
J. W. Grzymala-Busse. On the Strongly Related Automata, Foundations of Control Engineering 3, 3–8 (1978).
J. Hartmanis and R. E. Stearns. Algebraic Structure Theory of Sequential Machines. Prentice-Hall (1966).
M. Ito. A Representation of Strongly Connected Automata and Its Applications,J. CSS 17, 65–80 (1978).
M. Ito. Input Sets of Strongly Connected Automata, Fundamentals of Computation Theory, Band 2, 187–192 (1979).
Y. Masunaga, N. Noguchi and J. Oizumi. A Structure Theory of Automata Characterized by Group,J. CSS 7, 300–305 (1973).
C. A. Trauth, Jr. Group-Type Automata,J. ACM 13, 170–175 (1966).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ito, M. Some classes of automata as partially ordered sets. Math. Systems Theory 15, 357–370 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01786991
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01786991