Skip to main content
Log in

Three hierarchies of transducers

  • Published:
Mathematical systems theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Composition of top-down tree transducers yields a proper hierarchy of transductions and of output languages. The same is true for ETOL systems (viewed as transducers) and for two-way generalized sequential machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. V. Aho, Indexed grammars—an extension of context-free grammars,JACM 15, 647–671 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. V. Aho, J. E. Hopcroft and J. D. Ullman, A general theory of translation,Math. Syst. Th. 3, 193–221 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. V. Aho and J. D. Ullman, A characterization of two-way deterministic classes of languages,JCSS 4, 523–538 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. V. Aho and J. D. Ullman, Translations on a context-free grammar,Inf. and Control 19, 439–475 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Arnold and M. Dauchet, Translations de forets reconnaissables monadiques; forets coregulieres; RAIRO Informatique Theoretique 10, 5–28 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. R. J. Asveld, Controlled iteration grammars and full hyper-AFLs,Inf. and Control 34, 248–269 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. R. J. Asveld and J. Engelfriet, Iterated deterministic substitution,Acta Informatica 8, 285–302 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. R. J. Asveld and J. van Leeuwen, Infinite chains of hyper-AFLs, Memorandum 99, Twente University of Technology, 1975.

  9. B. S. Baker, Tree transductions and families of tree languages; Ph.D. Thesis; Harvard University, Report TR-9–73, 1973; see also references [44, 45, 46].

  10. M. P. Chytil and V. Jákl, Serial composition of 2-way finite-state transducers and simple programs on strings; inFourth Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, Turku, A. Salomaa and M. Steinby eds.,Lecture Notes in Computer Science 52, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Ehrenfeucht and G. Rozenberg, Three useful results concerningL languages without interactions; inL systeins, G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa eds., pp. 72–77,Lecture Notes in Computer Science 15, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Ehrenfeucht and G. Rozenberg, On inverse homomorphic images of deterministic ETOL languages, inAutomata, Languages, Development, A. Lindenmayer and G. Rozenberg eds., pp. 179–189, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. W. Ehrich and S. S. Yau, Two-way sequential transductions and stack automata,Inf. and Control 18, 404–446 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. S. Eisman, Derivation controlled Lindenmayer systems; excerpt from Ph.D. Thesis at University of California, Berkeley, 1977.

  15. J. Engelfriet, Surface tree languages and parallel derivation trees,TCS 2, 9–27 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Engelfriet, Bottom-up and top-down tree transformations—a comparison,Math. Syst. Th. 9, 198–231 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Engelfriet, Top-down tree transducers with regular look-ahead,Math. Syst. Th. 10, 289–303 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Engelfriet, On tree transducers for partial functions;Inf. Proc. Letters 7, 170–172 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Engelfriet, G. Rozenberg and G. Slutzki: Tree transducers,L systems and two-way machines,JCSS 20, 150–202 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Engelfriet, E. Meineche Schmidt and J. van Leeuwen, Stack machines and classes of nonnested macro languages,JACM 27, 96–117 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Engelfriet and S. Skyum, Copying theorems,Inf. Proc. Letters 4, 157–161 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. J. Fischer, Grammars with macro-like productions, Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University, 1968.

  23. S. Ginsburg,Algebraic and automata-theoretic properties of formal languages, North-Holland/American Elsevier, Amsterdam/New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. A. Greibach, Chains of full AFLs,Math. Syst. Th. 4, 231–242 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. A. Greibach, Syntactic operators on full semi-AFLs,JCSS 6, 30–76 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. A. Greibach, One-way finite visit automata,TCS 6, 175–221 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. A. Greibach, Hierarchy theorems for two-way finite state transducers,Acta Informatica 11, 89–101 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  28. T. Hayashi, On derivation trees of indexed grammars—an extension of theuvwxy-Theorem. Publ. of the Research Inst. for Math. Sciences (Kyoto University) 9 (1973) 61–92.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. E. Hopcroft and J. D. Ullman,Formal languages and their relation to automata, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Kiel, Two-way±-transducers and AFL,JCSS 10, 88–109 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. Latteux, EDTOL-systemes ultralineaires et operateurs associes, Publication no. 100, Université de Lille, 1977.

  32. W. F. Ogden and W. C. Rounds: Composition ofn transducers; Fourth ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 198–206, 1972.

  33. C. R. Perrault, Intercalation lemmas for tree transducer languages,JCSS 13, 246–277 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  34. V. Rajlich, Absolutely parallel grammars and two-way finite state transducers,JCSS 6, 324–342 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  35. W. C. Rounds, Mappings and grammars on trees,Math. Syst. Th. 4, 257–287 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  36. G. Rozenberg, Extensions of tabledOL-systems and languages,Int. J. Comp. Inform. Sci. 2, 311–336 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. Salomaa, Macros, iterated substitution and Lindenmayer AFLs,DAIMI PB-18, University of Aarhus, 1973 (see alsoL Systems, G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa eds.,Lecture Notes in Computer Science 15, pp. 250–253, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974).

  38. S. Skyum, Decomposition theorems for various kinds of languages parallel in nature,SIAM J. Comp. 5, 284–296 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. W. Thatcher, Characterizing derivation trees of context-free grammars through a generalization of finite automata theory,JCSS 1, 317–322 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. W. Thatcher, Generalized2 sequential machine maps,JCSS 4, 339–367 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. W. Thatcher, Tree automata: an informal survey; inCurrents in the Theory of Computing (ed. A. V. Aho), Prentice-Hall, 1973.

  42. J. van Leeuwen, Variations of a new machine model, 17th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Houston, Texas, pp. 228–235 (1976).

  43. J. Engelfriet, Two-way automata and checking automata, inFoundations of Computer Science III, eds. J. W. de Bakker and J. van Leeuwen, MC Tract 108, Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  44. B. S. Baker, Composition of top-down and bottom-up tree transductions,Inf. and Control 41, 186–213 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  45. B. S. Baker, Generalized syntax directed translation, tree transducers, and linear space,SIAM J. Comput. 7, 376–391 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  46. B. S. Baker, Tree transducers and tree languages,Inf. and Control 37, 241–266 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. Engelfriet and S. Skyum, The copying power of one-state tree transducers, ReportDAIMI PB-91, Aarhus University, 1978, to appear inJCSS.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelfriet, J. Three hierarchies of transducers. Math. Systems Theory 15, 95–125 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01786975

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01786975

Keywords

Navigation