Skip to main content
Log in

Recursive paths in cross-connected trees and an application to cell spaces

  • Published:
Mathematical systems theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While highly recursive infinite treesT do generally contain no recursive infinite path, they do so if sufficiently many cross connections between nodes ofT are recursively given. Applying this technique to 1-dimensional cell spaces, recursive configurations (given by a finite description) which are not Garden-of-Eden, always possess a recursive predecessor. This is in contrast to a known result on 2-dimensional spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Amoroso, G. Cooper, The Garden-of-Eden theorem for finite configurations,Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 26, 158–164 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Amoroso, G. Cooper, Y. Patt, Some clarifications of the concept of a Garden-of-Eden configuration,J. Comput. System Sci. 10, 77–82 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Amoroso, Y. Patt, Decision procedure for surjectivity and injectivity of parallel maps for tessellation structures,J. Comput. System Sci. 6, 448–464 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. W. Burks, On backwards-deterministic, erasable, and Garden-of-Eden automata, Tech. Rept. 012520–4-T, Dept. Comput. Comm. Sci., Univ. of Michigan.

  5. U. Golze, Differences between 1- and 2-dimensional cell spaces,in “Automata, Languages, Development” (A. Lindenmayer, G. Rozenberg, Ed.), 369–384, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. U. Golze, Backward computers for cell spaces,Progress in Cybernetics and Systems Research 3 (1977).

  7. E. F. Moore, Machine models of self-reproduction,in “Essays on Cellular Automata” (A. W. Burks, Ed.), 187–203, Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Myhill, The converse of Moore's Garden-of-Eden theorem,in “Essays on Cellular Automata” (A. W. Burks, Ed.), 204–205, Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Skyum, Confusion in the Garden of Eden,Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 50, 332–336 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. R. Smith, Introduction to and survey of polyautomata theory,in “Automata, Languages, Development” (A. Lindenmayer, G. Rozenberg, Ed.), 405–424, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Yaku, The constructibility of a construction in a cellular automaton,J. Comput. System Sci. 7, 481–496 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Yaku, Surjectivity of nondeterministic parallel maps induced by nondeterministic cellular automata,J. Comput. System Sci. 12, 1–5 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Yamada, S. Amoroso, Tessellation automata,Information and Control 14, 299–317 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carstens, H.G., Golze, U. Recursive paths in cross-connected trees and an application to cell spaces. Math. Systems Theory 15, 29–37 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01786971

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01786971

Keywords

Navigation