The abstraction of a shared memory is of growing importance in distributed computing systems. Traditional memory consistency ensures that all processes agree on a common order of all operations on memory. Unfortunately, providing these guarantees entails access latencies that prevent scaling to large systems. This paper weakens such guarantees by definingcausal memory, an abstraction that ensures that processes in a system agree on the relative ordering of operations that arecausally related. Because causal memory isweakly consistent, it admits more executions, and hence more concurrency, than either atomic or sequentially consistent memories. This paper provides a formal definition of causal memory and gives an implementation for message-passing systems. In addition, it describes a practical class of programs that, if developed for a strongly consistent memory, run correctly with causal memory.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adve SV, Hill MD: Weak ordering — a new definition. In: Proc. 17th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pp 2–14, May 1990
Adve SV, Hill MD: A unified formalization of four sharedmemory models. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 4(6): 613–624 (1993)
Afek Y, Brown G, Merritt M: Lazy caching. ACM Trans Program Lang Syst 15(1): 182–205 (1993)
Ahamad M, Bazzi RA, John R, Kohli P, Neiger G: The power of processor consistency. In: Proc 5th Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, pp 251–260. ACM Press, June 1993. A full version appears a Technical Report 92/34, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology
Ahamad M, Burns JE, Hutto PW, Neiger G: Causal memory. In: Toueg S, Spirakis PG, Kirousis L (eds) Proc 5th International Workshop on Distributed Algorithms. Lect Notes Comput Sci, vol 579, pp 9–30. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 1991
Ahamad M, Hutto PW, John R: Implementing and programming causal distributed shared memory. In: Proc 11th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pp 274–281, May 1991
Attiya H, Chaudhuri S, Friedman R, Welch JL: Shared memory consistency conditions for non-sequential execution: definitions and programming strategies. In: Proc 5th Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, pp 241–250. ACM Press, June 1993
Attiya H, Friedman R: A corretness condition for high performance multiprocessors. In: Proc 24th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp 679–690. ACM Press, May 1992
Attiya H, Friedman R: Programming DEC-Alpha based multiprocessors the easy way. In: Proc 6th Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, pp 157–166. ACM Press, June 1994. A revised and expanded version appears as Technical Report 9411, Laboratory for Parallel Computing Research, Israel Institute of Technology, October 1994
Attiya H, Welch JL: Sequential consistency versus linearizability. ACM Trans Comput Syst 12(2): 91–122 (1994)
Bennett JK, Carter JB, Zwaenepoel W: Adaptive software cache management for distributed shared memory architectures. In: Proc 17th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, May 1990
Bertsekas DP, Tsitsiklis JN: Parallel and distributed computation: numerical methods. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1989
Birman K, Schiper A, Stephenson P: Lightweight causal and atomic group multicast. ACM Trans Comput Syst 9(3): 272–314 (1991)
Fidge C: Logical time in distributed computing systems. Computer 24(8): 28–33 (1991)
Friedman R: Personal communication, 1991
Gharachorloo K, Lenoski D, Laudon J, Gibbons P, Gupta A, Hennssy J: Memory consistency and event ordering in scalable shared-memory multiprocessors. In: Proc 17th International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pp 15–26, May 1990
Gibbons PB, Merritt M, Gharachorloo K: Proving sequential consistency of high-performance shared memories. In: Proc 3rd Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, pp 292–303. ACM Press, July 1991
Goodman JR: Cache consistency and sequential consistency. Technical Report 61, IEEE Scalable Coherent Interface Working Group, March 1989
Heddaya A, Sinha HS: Coherence, non-coherence and local consistency in distributed shared memory for parallel computing. Technical Report 92-004, Computer Science Department, Boston University, May 1992
Herlihy MP, Wing JM: Linearizability: a correctness condition for concurrent objects. ACM Trans Program Lang Syst 12(3): 463–492 (1990)
Hutto PW, Ahamad M: Slow memory: weakening consistency to enhance concurrency in distributed shared memories. In: Proc 10th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, May 1990. A complete version appears as Technical Report 89/39, School of Information and Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology
John R: Implementing and programming weakly consistent memories. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1994
John R, Ahamad M: Implementation and evaluation of causal memory for data race free programs. Technical Report 94/30, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, July 1994
Kessler RE, Livny M: An analysis of distributed shared memory algorithms. In: Proc 9th International Conference on Distributed Computing, pp 498–505, June 1989
Kohli P, Neiger G, Ahamad M: A characterization of scalabe shared memories. In: Proc 22nd International Conference on Parallel Processing, pp I-332–I-335, August 1993
Lamport L: Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system. Commun ACM 21(7): 558–565 (1978)
Lamport L: How to make a multiprocessor computer that correctly executes multiprocess programs. IEEE Trans Comput C-28(9): 690–691 (1979)
Lamport L: On interprocess communication, part I: Basic formalism. Distrib Comput 1(2): 77–85 (1986)
Lipton RJ, Sandberg JS: PRAM: a scalable shared memory. Technical Report 180-88, Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, September 1988
Mattern F: Virtual time and global states of distributed systems. In: Cosnard M, Quinton P, Robert Y, Raynal M (eds) Proc International Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Algorithms, pp 215–226. North-Holland, October 1988
Mavronicolas M, Roth D: Sequential consistency and linearizability: read/write objects. In: Proc 29th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, pp 683–692, October 1991. A revised version appears as Technical Report 28-91, Aiken Computation Laboratory, Harward University, June 1992 under the title “Linearizable Read/Write Objects”
Mavronicolas M, Roth D: Efficient, strongly consistent implementations of shared memory. In: Segall A, Zaks S (eds) Proc 6th International Workshop on Distributed Algorithms. Lect Notes Comput Sci, vol 647, pp 346–361. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 1992
Misra J: Axioms for memory access in asynchronous hardware systems. ACM Trans Program Lang Syst 8(1): 142–153 (1986)
Peterson GL: Myths about the mutual exclusion problem. Inf Process Lett 12(3): 115–116 (1981)
Singh AK: A framework for programming using non-atomic variables. In: Proc 8th International Parallel Processing Symposium, pp 133–140, IEEE Computer Society Press, April 1994
Mustaque Ahamad is an Associate Professor in the College of Computing at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science from the State University of New York at Stony Brook in 1983 and 1985 respectively. His research interests include distributed operating systems, consistency of shared information in large scale distributed systems, and replicated data systems.
James E. Burns received the B.S. degree in mathematics from the California Institute of Technology, the M.B.I.S. degree from Georgia State University, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in information and computer science from the Georgia Institute of Technology. He served on the faculty of Computer Science at Indiana University and the College of Computing at the Georgia Institute of Technology before joining Bellcore in 1993. He is currently a Member of Technical Staff in the Network Control Research Department, where he is studying the telephone control network with special interest in behavior when faults occur. He also has research interests in theoretical issues of distributed and parallel computing especially relating to problems of synchronization and fault tolerance.
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grants CCR-8619886, CCR-8909663, CCR-9106627, and CCR-9301454. Parts of this paper appeared in S. Toueg, P.G. Spirakis, and L. Kirousis, editors,Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Distributed Algorithms, volume 579 ofLecture Notes on Computer Science, pages 9–30, Springer-Verlag, October 1991
The photograph of Professor J.E. Burns was published in Volume 8, No. 2, 1994 on page 59
This author's contributions were made while he was a graduate student at the Georgia Institute of Technology. No photograph and biographical information is available for P.W. Hutto
Gil Neiger was born on February 19, 1957 in New York, New York. In June 1979, he received an A.B. in Mathematics and Psycholinguistics from Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. In February 1985, he spent two weeks picking cotton in Nicaragua in a brigade of international volunteers. In January 1986, he received an M.S. in Computer Science from Cornell University in Ithaca, New York and, in August 1988, he received a Ph.D. in Computer Science, also from Cornell University. On August 20, 1988, Dr. Neiger married Hilary Lombard in Lansing, New York. He is currently a Staff Software Engineer at Intel's Software Technology Lab in Hillsboro, Oregon. Dr. Neiger is a member of the editorial boards of theChicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science and theJournal of Parallel and Distributed Computing.
About this article
Cite this article
Ahamad, M., Neiger, G., Burns, J.E. et al. Causal memory: definitions, implementation, and programming. Distrib Comput 9, 37–49 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01784241
- Memory consistency
- Causal memory
- Sequential consistency
- Distributed shared memory