Advertisement

Nonrenewable Resources

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 281–292 | Cite as

Fundamental issues in quantitative estimation of mineral resources

  • Guocheng Pan
  • DeVerle P. Harris
  • Tim Heiner
Articles

Abstract

Several issues considered to be fundamental in quantitative estimation of mineral resources and selection of mineral targets are addressed. Integration of multiple data sets, either by experts or by statistical methods, has become a common practice in estimation of mineral potential. Several major problems in data integration must be solved to significantly improve mineral resource estimation. Issues related to randomness of mineral endowment, basic statistical tools, exceptionalness of ore, and economic truncation and translation are discussed in the first part of the article. A number of important technical problems in data integration are also identified; they include data compilation, information enhancement, information synthesis, and target selection.

Key words

Mineral resource estimation Information synthesis Mineral target 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agterberg, F.P., 1981, Application of image analysis and multivariate analysis to mineral resource appraisal: Economic Geology, v. 76, p. 1016–1031.Google Scholar
  2. —— 1988, Application of recent developments of regression analysis in regional mineral resource evaluation,in Chung, C.F., Fabbri, A.G., and Sinding-Larsen, R., eds., Quantitative analysis of mineral and energy resources: Dordrecht, Reidel, p. 1–28.Google Scholar
  3. —— 1989, Computer programs for mineral exploration: Science, v. 245, p. 76–81.Google Scholar
  4. —— 1992, Combining indicator patterns in weights of evidence modeling for resource evaluation: Nonrenewable Resources, v. 1, p. 39–50.Google Scholar
  5. Allais, M., 1957, Method of appraising economic prospects of mining exploration over large territories—Algerian Sahara case study: Management Science, v. 3, p. 285–347.Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, H.J., and Morse, C., 1963, Scarcity and growth,in XXX, eds., The economics of natural resource availability: Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press (for Resources for the Future), p. XX-XX.Google Scholar
  7. Botbol, J.M., Sinding-Larsen, R., McCammon, R.B., and Gott, G.B., 1978, A regionalized multivariate approach to target selection in geochemical exploration: Economic Geology, v. 73, p. 534–546.Google Scholar
  8. Brinck, J.W., 1972, Prediction of mineral resources and long-term price trends in the nonferrous metal mining industry,in Campbell, F.A., and Wilson, H.D.B., conveners, sec. 4, Mineral deposits: International Geological Congress, 24th, Montreal, 1972 [Proceedings], p. 3–15.Google Scholar
  9. Charles River Associates, Inc., 1978, The economics and geology of mineral supply—An integrated framework for long run policy analysis. Publication prepared for the National Science Foundation, Report No. 327: Boston, Charles River Associates, Inc., 165 p.Google Scholar
  10. Chung, C.F., and Agterberg, F.P., 1980, Regression models for estimating mineral resources from geological map data: Mathematical Geology, v. 12, p. 473–488.Google Scholar
  11. Chung, C.F., Jefferson, C.W., and Singer, D.A., 1992, A quantitative link among mineral deposit modeling, geoscience mapping, and exploration-resource assessment: Economic Geology, v. 87, p. 194–197.Google Scholar
  12. Cox, D.P., 1990, Development and use of deposit models in the U.S. Geological Survey,in Eighth IAGOD Symposium Program with Abstracts: Ottawa, Aug. 12–18, 1990, p. A99.Google Scholar
  13. Finch, W.I., and McCammon, R.B., 1987, Uranium resource assessment by the Geological Survey—Methodology and plan to update the national resource base: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 994, 22 p.Google Scholar
  14. Gorelov, D.A., 1982, Quantitative characteristics of geologic anomalies in assessing ore capacity: International Geological Review, v. 24, p. 457–466.Google Scholar
  15. Green, W.R., 1991, Exploration with a computer—Geoscience data analysis and applications: Oxford, Pergamon, 225 p.Google Scholar
  16. Harris, D.P., 1965, An application of multivariate statistical analysis to mineral exploration: The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, Ph.D. dissertation, 261 p.Google Scholar
  17. —— 1984, Mineral resources appraisal—Mineral endowment, resources, and potential supply—Concept, methods, and cases: New York, Oxford University Press, 455 p.Google Scholar
  18. —— 1990, Mineral exploration decisions, a guide to economic analysis and modeling: New York, Wiley/InterScience, 436 p.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, D.P., and Carrigan, F.J., 1981, Estimation of uranium endowment by subjective geological analysis—A comparison of methods and estimates for the San Juan Basin, New Mexico: Economic Geology, v. 76, p. 1032–1055.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, D.P., and Chavez, L., 1981, Crustal abundance and a potential supply system,in System and economics for the estimation of uranium potential supply, part II: Grand Junction Office, Colorado, U.S. Department of Energy, p. 385–506.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, D.P., and Pan, G.C., 1990, Subdividing consistent geological areas by relative exceptionalness of additional information—Methods and case study: Economic Geology, v. 85, p. 1072–1083.Google Scholar
  22. —— 1991, Consistent geological areas for epithermal gold-silver deposits in the Walker Lake quadrangle of Nevada and California, delineated by quantitative methods: Economic Geology, v. 86, p. 142–165.Google Scholar
  23. Hattori, I., 1976, Entropy in Markov chains and discrimination of cyclic patterns in lithologic successions: Mathematical Geology, v. 8, p. 477–497.Google Scholar
  24. Kantsel, A.V., 1967, Function of metal distribution in ores, as genetic characteristics of mineralization process: International Geological Review, v. 9, p. 669–676.Google Scholar
  25. Koch, G.S., Jr., and Papacharalampos, D., 1988, GEOVALUATOR, an expert system for resource appraisal—A demonstration prototype for Kalin in Georgia, U.S.A.,in Chung, C.F., ed., Quantitative analysis of mineral and energy resource: Dordrecht, Reidel, p. 513–527.Google Scholar
  26. Laznicka, P., 1983, Giant ore deposits—A quantitative approach: Global Tectonics and Metallogeny, v. 2, p. 41–63.Google Scholar
  27. McCammon, R.B., 1990, Prospector III,in Agterberg, F.P., and Bonham-Carter, G.F., eds., Statistical applications in the earth sciences: Geological Survey of Canada Paper 89-9, p. 395–404.Google Scholar
  28. McCammon, R.B., Botbol, J.M., Sinding-Larsen, R., and Bowen, R.W., 1983, Characteristic analysis — 1981 — Final program and a possible discovery: Mathematical Geology, v. 15, p. 59–83.Google Scholar
  29. Pan, G.C., 1987, A stochastic approach to optimum decomposition of cyclic patterns in sedimentary processes: Mathematical Geology, v. 19, p. 503–521.Google Scholar
  30. -- 1989, Concepts and methods of multivariate information synthesis for mineral resources estimation: University of Arizona, Tucson, Ph.D. dissertation, 302 p.Google Scholar
  31. Pan, G.C., and Harris, D.P., 1990, Three nonparametric techniques for optimum discretization of quantitative geological measurement: Mathematical Geology, v. 22, p. 699–722.Google Scholar
  32. —— 1991, Geology-exploration endowment models for simultaneous estimation of discoverable mineral resources and endowment: Mathematical Geology, v. 23, p. 507–540.Google Scholar
  33. —— 1992, Estimating a favorability equation for the integration of geodata and selection of mineral exploration target: Mathematical Geology, v. 24, p. 177–202.Google Scholar
  34. -- in press, Delineation of intrinsic geological units: Mathematical Geology, v. 24.Google Scholar
  35. Sabins, F.F., Jr., 1987, Remote sensing—Principles and interpretation, 2d ed.: New York, Freeman, 449 p.Google Scholar
  36. Schwarzacher, W., 1969, The use of Markov chains in the study of sedimentary cycles: Mathematical Geology, v. 1, p. 17–39.Google Scholar
  37. Singer, D.A., and Kouda, R., 1988, Integrating spatial and frequency information in the search for Kuroko deposits of the Hokuroku district, Japan: Economic Geology, v. 83, p. 18–29.Google Scholar
  38. Skinner, B.J., 1976, A second iron age ahead? American Scientist, v. 64, p. 258–269.Google Scholar
  39. Stanley, M., 1992, Statistical trends and discoverability modeling of gold deposits in the Arbitibi greenstone belt, Ontario,in Kim, Y.C., ed., 23rd International Symposium of APCOM: Tucson, Ariz., Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., p. 17–28.Google Scholar
  40. Tomson, I.N., and Polyakova, O.P., 1984, Mineralogical and geochemical indicators of large ore deposits: Global Tectonics and Metallogeny, v. 2, p. 183–186.Google Scholar
  41. Vistelius, A.B., 1960, The skew frequency distributions and the fundamental law of geochemistry: Journal of Geology, v. 68, p. 1–22.Google Scholar
  42. —— 1972, Ideal granite and its properties. I. The stochastic model: Mathematical Geology, v. 4, p. 89–102.Google Scholar
  43. —— 1981, Gravitational stratification,in Graid, R.G., and Labovitz, M.L., eds., Future trends in geomathematics: London, Pion Limited, p. 134–158.Google Scholar
  44. Vistelius, A.B., and Harbaugh, J.W., 1980, Granitic rocks of Yosemite Valley and ideal granite model: Mathematical Geology, v. 12, p. 1–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Oxford University Press 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guocheng Pan
    • 1
  • DeVerle P. Harris
    • 2
  • Tim Heiner
    • 3
  1. 1.NERCO Exploration Co.PortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mining and Geological EngineeringUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.NERCO Minerals Co.PortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations