Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antimetastatic action of orally administered lysozyme in mice bearing Lewis lung carcinoma

  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pharmacological activity of orally administered lysozyme, for the control of the growth of solid tumor metastases, was examined in mice bearing Lewis lung carcinoma. Groups of at least 10 tumor-bearing mice, fed daily for three consecutive weeks from subcutaneous tumor implantation with lysozyme, prepared from hen egg-white, had a pronounced reduction of the weight of their metastatic tumor to 25–50 per cent of controls within a wide range of doses (25–200mg/kg/day). The antimetastatic effect was not related to the length of the treatment schedule employed; a short course of 7 days, given on days 1–7 after tumor implantation, proved equally active. The inhibition of the formation of lung metastases, in mice treated with lysozyme prior to tumor inoculation, lasts for at least 2 weeks after discontinuation of treatment, indicating that the antimetastatic activity observed is not associated with cytotoxic activity of the lysozyme, and is probably mediated by the elicitation of host responses. The examination of the therapeutic potential of the antimetastatic action of lysozyme supplied throught the usual diet indicates that this treatment synergizes with the antitumor effects of cisplatin, given to mice after surgical removal of the primary tumor, causing a statistically significant prolongation of the survival time of the animals as compared with chemotherapy alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baldwin, R. W., 1982, Manipulation of host resistance in cancer therapy.Springer Seminars in Immunopathology,5, 113–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chedid, L., 1983, Muramyl peptides as possible endogenous immunopharmacological mediators.Microbiology and Immunology,27, 723–732.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Collet, B., Martin, A., Le Garrec, Y., Dubray, G., andToujas, L., 1983, Antitumor activity of cell walls fromBruceila abortus.Journal of the National Cancer Institute,71, 529–534.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fidler, I. J., Barnes, Z., Fogler, W. E., Kirsh, R., Bugelski, P., andPoste, G., 1982, Involvement of macrophages in the eradication of established metastases following intravenous injection of liposomes containing macrophage activators.Cancer Research,42, 496–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gouguel, A. F., Lespinats, G., andNauciel, C., 1982, Peptidoglycans extracted from Gram-positive bacteria: expression of antitumor activity according to peptide structure and route of injection.Journal of the National Cancer Institute,68, 657–663.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gouguel, A. F., Payelle, B., Lespinats, G., andNauciel, C., 1983., Cytotoxic responses induced by peptidoglycans with or withoutin vivo antitumor activity.Journal of the National Cancer Institute,71, 325–330.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hrsak, I., Tomasic, J., andOsmak, M., 1983, Immunotherapy of B-16 melanoma with peptidoglycan monomer.European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology,19, 681–686.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Inamura, N., Fujitsu, T., Nakahara, K., Abiko, M., Horii, T., Hashimoto, S., andAoki, H., 1984, Potentiation of tumoricidal properties of murine macrophages byNocardia rubra cell wall skeleton (N-CWS).Journal of Antibiotics,37, 244–252.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. James, S. E., andSalsbury, A. J., 1974, Effect of (±)-1, 2-bis(3,5-dioxopiperazin-1-yl)propane on tumor blood vessels and its relationship to the antimetastatic effect on the Lewis lung carcinoma.Cancer Research,34, 839–842.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jollès, P., 1976, A possible physiological function of lysozyme.Biomedicine,25, 275–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jollès, P., andWerner, G. H., 1981, What's new in immunomodulation.Trends in Biochemical Sciences,6, 331–333.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lemarbre, P., Rinehart, J. J., Kay, N. E., Vesella, R., andJacob, H. S., 1981, Lysozyme enhances monocyte-mediated tumoricidal activity: a potential amplifying mechanism of tumor killing.Blood,58, 994–999.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Namba, Y., Hidaka, Y., Taki, K., andMorimoto, T., 1981, Effects of oral administration of lysozyme or digested cell walls on immunostimulation in guinea pig.Infection and Immunity,31, 580–583.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. North, R. J., Dye, K. S., Mills, C. D., andChandler, J. P., 1982, Modulation of antitumor immunity-immunobiologic approaches.Springer Seminars in Immunopathology,5, 193–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Osserman, E. F., Klockars, M., Halper, J., andFischel, R. E., 1973, Effects of lysozyme on normal and transformed mammalian cells.Nature,243, 331–335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rinehart, J., Jacobs, H., andOsserman, E., 1979, Lysozyme modulation of lymphocyte proliferation.Clinical Research,27, 305A.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenberg, B., 1980, Clinical aspects of platinum anticancer drugs.Metal Ions in Biological Systems, edited by H. Sigel (New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.), Vol. 11, pp. 127–196.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sacchi, A., Corsi, A., Caputo, M., andZupi, G., 1979,In vitro andin vivo selection of two Lewis lung carcinoma cell lines.Tumori,65, 657–664.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sava, G., Giraldi, T., Tomasic, J., andHrsak, I., 1983, Immunotherapy of Lewis lung carcinoma with hydrosoluble peptidoglycan monomer.Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy,15, 84–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sava, G., Tomasic, J., andHrsak, I., 1984, Antitumor and antimetastatic activity of the immunoadjuvant peptidoglycan monomer PGM in mice bearing MCa mammary carcinoma.Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy,18, 49–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Siegel, S., 1956, The Mann-Whitney U test.Non parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (New York: McGraw-Hill), pp. 116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Simpson-Herren, L., Sandford, A. H., andHolmquist, J. P., 1976, Effects of surgery on the cell kinetics of residual tumor.Cancer Treatment Reports,60, 1740–1760.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Snedecor, G. W., andCochran, W. G., 1967,Statistical Methods (Ames, Iowa: Iowa University Press), pp. 258–298.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sokal, R. R., andRohlf, F. J., 1969, Single classification analysis of variance.Biometry, (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman), pp. 204–252.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vosika, G. J., 1983, Clinical immunotherapy trials of bacterial components derived from mycobacteria and nocardia.Journal of Biological Response Modifiers,2, 321–342.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sava, G., Perissin, L. & Zorzet, S. Antimetastatic action of orally administered lysozyme in mice bearing Lewis lung carcinoma. Clin Exp Metast 6, 245–253 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01782484

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01782484

Keywords

Navigation