Advertisement

Nonrenewable Resources

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 85–96 | Cite as

Classifying mineral potential in support of land-use policy decisions in British Columbia, Canada

  • Graeme P. McLaren
Articles

Abstract

British Columbia covers a vast segment of the Cordillera Mountain system that is richly endowed with a diversity of resources. British Columbia's historic patterns of resource development increasingly have been in conflict with demands for greater environmental protection. To avoid such conflicts, a recently legislated process that provides for detailed mineral resource assessments in candidate park areas has stimulated the creation of a mineral potential classification system for use in land-use planning and policy decisions.

A mineral potential study of the Chilko Lake Planning Area provided three unique categories of field data on which to build the classification system. These categories are geological setting, geochemistry, and mineral occurrences. Data in each category were compiled independently to provide indicators of mineral potential. The field data were used to develop a widely understood classification of mineral potential. The classification is based on two factors: favorability and degree of confidence.

Favorability refers to how field data satisfy criteria for established mineral deposit models. A greater degree of confidence in the mineral potential rating is achieved as more data categories are determined to be favorable. A mineral potential map shows the classification ratings.

The classification conveys to land-use planners all the concepts necessary to appreciate mineral potential designations. It is used to produce a concise map highlighting zones worthy of exploration by industry. The interpretive display maintains broad appeal, but by adapting data to a geographic information system, more detailed interpretations are possible. Geophysical data can also be accom-modated by expanding the system. Qualitative descriptions of each mineral potential category describe the likelihood for future exploration activities as a measure of expected land use. The relation between resource values and land-use activities has been confirmed by industry follow-up in the area.

Key words

Mineral potential Land use British Columbia Geology Geochemistry Mineral deposits 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barry, G.S., and Freyman, A.J., 1970, Mineral endowment of the Canadian Northwest: Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, Mineral Information Bulletin MR105, p. 57–95.Google Scholar
  2. British Columbia Department of Recreation and Conservation, 1976, The Chilcotin Wilderness Park study: Parks Branch, 27 p.Google Scholar
  3. British Columbia Ministry of Lands, Parks and Housing, 1982, Chilko Lake Deferred Area plan: Parks and Outdoor Recreation Division, Cariboo Region, 57 p.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, D.P., and Singer, D.A., eds., 1986, Mineral deposit models: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1693, 379 p.Google Scholar
  5. Dolmage, V.J., 1925, Chilko Lake and vicinity, British Columbia: Geological Survey of Canada Summary Report, 1924, Part A, p. 59–75.Google Scholar
  6. Eckstrand, O.R., 1984, Canadian mineral deposit types—A Canadian synopsis: Geological Survey of Canada Economic Geology Report 36, 86 p.Google Scholar
  7. Findlay, D.C., 1982, Regional mineral resource assessment,in Mineral policy formulation—The role of scientific and technical knowledge,in Wojciechowski, M.J., ed., Proceedings Number 13, Centre for Resource Studies, Queens University, p. 52–77.Google Scholar
  8. Gair, J.E., Goldsmith, R., Daniels, D.L., Griffitts, W.R., De Young, J.H., and Lee, M.P., 1986, The Conterminous United States Mineral Assessment Program—Background information to accompany folio of geologic, geophysical, geochemical, mineral-occurrence, mineral-resource potential, and mineral production maps of the Charlotte 1 × 2 degree quadrangle, North Carolina and South Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 944, 18 p.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, D.P., and Agterberg, F.P., 1981, The appraisal of mineral resources: Economic Geology, 75th anniversary volume, p. 897–938.Google Scholar
  10. Harrison, J.E., Leach, D.L., Kleinkopf, M.D., Long, C.L., Rowan, L.C., and Marvin, R.F., 1986, The Conterminous United States Mineral Assessment Program—Background information to accompany folio of geologic, geophysical, geochemical, remote sensing, and mineral resource maps of Wallace 1 × 2 degree quadrangle, Montana and Idaho: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 920, 13 p.Google Scholar
  11. Hutchison, W.W., 1986, National Geoscience Programs—A base for resource assessments of Canadian lands,in Cargill, S.N., and Green, S.B., eds., Prospects for mineral resource assessments on public lands, Proceedings of the Leesburg Workshop: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 980, p. 1–18.Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, G.D., and Sangster, D.F., 1987, Geology and resource potential of a proposed national park, Bylot Island and northwestern Baffin Island, Northwest Territories: Geological Survey of Canada Paper 87–17, 31 p.Google Scholar
  13. Leitch, C.H.B., and Godwin, C.I., 1988, Isotopic ages, wallrock chemistry and fluid inclusion data from the Bralorne gold vein deposit: British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Geological Fieldwork 1987, Paper 1988–1, p. 301–324.Google Scholar
  14. McCartney, W.D., Fyles, J.T., and Matheson, A.H., 1974, Mineral capability maps for land-use planning in British Columbia: Western Miner. v. 47, p. 9–16.Google Scholar
  15. McLaren, G.P., 1990, A mineral resource assessment of the Chilko Lake Planning Area: British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Bulletin 81, 117 p.Google Scholar
  16. McMillan, W.J., Panteleyev, A.P., and Hoy, T., 1987, Mineral deposits in British Columbia—A review of their tectonic settings,in Elliot, I.L., and Smee, B.W., eds., GEOEXPO/86 Exploration in the North American Cordillera, Association of Exploration Geochemists, Conference Proceedings, Vancouver, Canada, p. 1–8.Google Scholar
  17. Panteleyev, A., 1986, Ore deposits number 10, A Canadian Cordilleran model for epithermal gold-silver deposits: Geoscience Canada, v. 13, p. 101–112.Google Scholar
  18. Singer, D.A., and Ovenshine, A.T., 1979, Assessing metallic resources in Alaska: American Scientist, v. 67, p. 582–589.Google Scholar
  19. Tipper, H.W., 1969, Mesozoic and Cenozoic geology of the northeast part of Mount Waddington map area (92N), Coast District, British Columbia: Geological Survey of Canada Paper 68–33, 103 p.Google Scholar
  20. Voelker, A.H., Wedow, H., Oakes, E., and Scheffer, P.K., 1979, A systematic method for resource rating with two applications to potential wilderness areas: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Publication ORNL/TM-6739, 48 p.Google Scholar
  21. Woodsworth, G.J., Pearson, D.E., and Sinclair, A.J., 1977, Metal distribution patterns across the eastern flank of the Coast Plutonic Complex, south-central British Columbia: Economic Geology, v. 72, p. 170–183.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Oxford University Press 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graeme P. McLaren
    • 1
  1. 1.Mineral Policy BranchMinistry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum ResourcesVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations