Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of partial volume and phase shift between fat and water in gradient-echo magnetic resonance-mammography

  • Papers
  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The signal modulations caused by partial volume effect and phase shift between fat and water signal in gradient-echo magnetic resonance mammography (GRE MR-mammography) have been calculated. Based on this, the theoretical sensitivity and specificity of GRE MR-mammography has been investigated considering different evaluation methods for the gadolinium-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA)-based signal enhancement. The results show that both in- and out-of-phase sequences suffer from partial volume effects in voxels that contain both fat and water. This can decrease sensitivity to Gd-DTPA uptake in small, fat-embedded lesions or in pathology that contains fat interspersed histologically. Additionally, out-of-phase sequences can suffer from phase cancellation effects that can further decrease their sensitivity to Gd-DTPA uptake. In the worst case signal can actually decrease during Gd-DTPA influx. Determination of enhancement relative to the baseline value can decrease the specificity of GRE MR-mammography in the out-of-phase condition and decrease the sensitivity in the in-phase condition. These effects are less pronounced when enhancement is calculated relative to fat. These effects need to be understood since Gd-DTPA uptake is the prime indicator of malignancy in MR-mammography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Damadian R (1971) Tumor detection by nuclear magnetic resonance.Science 1 1151–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mansfield P, Morris PG, Ordidge RJ, et al. (1979) Carcinoma in the breast imaged by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).Br J Radiol 52 242–243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. El Yousef SJ, Duchnesneau RH (1984) Magnetic resonance imaging of the human breast: a phase I trial.Radiol Clin North Am 22 859–868.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, et al. (1986) MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA.J Comp Assist Tomogr 10 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E (1989) MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA.Radiology 170 681–686.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, et al. (1989) MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations.Radiology 171 95–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heywang-Koebrunner SH (1990)Contrast enhanced MRl of the breast. Basel: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stack JP, Redmond OM, Codd MB, et al. (1990) Breast disease: tissue characterisation with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles.Radiology 174 491–494.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaiser WA (1993)MR Mammography (MRM). Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Li Volsi VA, et al. (1994) Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic- pathologic correlation.Radiology 190(2 485–493.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heywang-Köbrunner SH (1994) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: comparison of two different doses of gadopentate dimeglumine.Radiology 191(3 639.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sittek H, Kessler M, Bredl T et al. (1994) Breast malignancies: dynamic FLASH 3D MR-mammography versus mammography.Radiology 193(P) 121.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaiser WA, Hahn D (1995) Diagnostic pitfalls in dynamic MR-mammography.European Radiology 5(Suppl. 264.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Viehweg P, Kósling S, et al. (1995) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: technical aspects and pitfalls.European Radiology 5(Suppl. 264.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rubens D, Totterman S, Chacko AK, et al. (1991) Gadopentate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast.Am J Radiol 157 267–270.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harms S, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. (1993) MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation.Radiology 187 493–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peller, M., Stehling, M.K., Sittek, H. et al. Effects of partial volume and phase shift between fat and water in gradient-echo magnetic resonance-mammography. MAGMA 4, 105–113 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01772517

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01772517

Keywords

Navigation