Breathhold imaging of the upper abdomen using a circular polarized-array coil: comparison with standard body coil imaging
- 38 Downloads
Current studies emphasize the use of array coils to decrease noise and increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). We applied Tl-weighted and T2-weighted standard nonbreathhold spin echo (SE) sequences and Tl-weighted FLASH, TurboFLASH, T2-weighted spin-echo time (TSE), and heavily T2-weighted half Fourier acquisition single-shot TSE (HASTE) sequences during breathhold for abdominal imaging in 15 normal volunteers. The breathhold scans were performed using both a standard coil and a circular polarized array coil. We analyzed the signal intensity (SI), SNR, and CNR of abdominal organs in all sequences. SNRs increased in all cases by an overall factor of ∼3 due to an 8% increase in overall Sis and a 50% decrease in noise when applying the array coil. Although the array-coil FLASH sequence performed at least as well as the respective SE sequence, the SNRs of the array-coil TurboFLASH, TSE breathhold, and HASTE sequences were generally lower. We conclude that array-coil imaging significantly improves fast imaging of the abdomen.
Keywordsabdomen magnetic resonance coil arrays magnetic resonance artifact magnetic resonance imaging
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Zang LH, Pielden J, Wilbrink J, Takane A, Koizumi H (1993) Correction of translational motion artifacts in multi-slice spin-echo imaging using self-calibration.Magn Reson Me 29 327–234.Google Scholar
- 14.Whitney WS, Herfkens RJ, Jeffrey RB, McDonnell CH, Li KC, Van Dalsem WJ, Low RN, Francis IR, Dabatin JF, Glazer GM (1993) Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5 T.Radiology 189 863–870.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Edelman RR, Siegel JB, Singer A, Dupuis K, Longmaid HE (1989) Dynamic MR imaging of the liver with Gd-DTPA: initial clinical results.Am J Roentgenol 153 1213–1219.Google Scholar
- 27.Wernecke K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G, Vassallo P, Kivelitz D, Wiesmann W, Peters PE, Reers B, Reiser M, Pircher W (1991) Detection of hepatic masses in patients with carcinoma: comparative sensitivities of sonography, CT, and MR imaging [see comments].Am J Roentgenol 157 731–739.Google Scholar
- 31.de Lange EE, Mugler J3, Bosworth JE, De Angelis GA, Gay SB, Hurt NS, Berr SS, Rosenblatt JM, Merickel LW, Harris EK (1994) MR imaging of the liver: breath-hold Tl-weighted MP-GRE compared with conventional T2-weighted SE imaging—lesion detection, localization, and characterization.Radiology 190 727–736.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Urhahn R, Drobnitzky M, Klose KC, Gunther RW (1992) Incremental flip angle snapshot FLASH MRI of hepatic lesions: improvement of signal-to-noise and contrast.J Cornput Assist Tomogr 16 219–225.Google Scholar
- 33.Semelka RC, Chew W, Hricak H, Tomei E, Higgins CB (1990) Fat-saturation MR imaging of the upper abdomen.Am J Roentgenol 155 1111–1116.Google Scholar