Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 79–100 | Cite as

Price response of the production and import structure — An econometric analysis, FRG 1954–1967

  • K. Conrad
  • R. Fahrion
Article

Summary

The purpose of this paper is to analyse for sectoral industries the responsiveness of the production structure to price changes for domestic and imported goods, and for competitive imports. Under the assumption of cost-minimizing behaviour a sector can either rearrange factors of production for producing its output at home, or he can reduce the production by importing the competitive final product. Instead of characterizing the technology by a homogeneous production function in the quantities of intermediate goods, capital, labor and imports, we choose the unit cost function in the prices of the inputs. By using Shephard's Lemma we obtain a system of cost-minimizing input- and import coefficients as functions of the prices which account for substitution possibilities and changes in technology over time. For purposes of econometric estimation we choose translog unit cost functions and translog price aggregator functions. Our empirical results are based on yearly input-output tables and import matrices in current and constant prices for the Federal Republic of Germany for the periode 1954–1967.

Keywords

Price Change Sectoral Industry Intermediate Good Import Matrice Homogeneous Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.J.: The Measurement of Real Value Added, Nations and Households in Economic Growth. Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz, 1974.Google Scholar
  2. Berndt, E.R., andL.R. Christensen: The Translog Function and the Substitution of Equipment, Structures, and Labour in U.S. Manufacturing, 1929–1968. Journal of Econometrics1, (1) 1973, 81–113.Google Scholar
  3. Berndt, E.R., andD.O. Wood: Technology, Prices, and the Derived Demand for Energy. The Review of Economics and Statistics57 (3), 1975, 259–268.Google Scholar
  4. Conrad, K., andD.W. Jorgenson: Measuring Performance in the Private Economy of the Federal Republic of Germany, 1950–1973, Tübingen 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, L.R., D.W. Jorgenson, andL.J. Lau: Conjugate Duality and the Transcendental Logarithmic Production Function, Econometrica39, 1971, 255–256.Google Scholar
  6. —: Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers, Review of Economics and Statistics55, 1973, 28–45.Google Scholar
  7. -: The Measurement of U.S. Real Capital Input, 1929–1967, Review of Income and Wealth, 1969, 293–320.Google Scholar
  8. -: U.S. Real Product and Real Factor Input, 1929–1967. Review of Income and Wealth, 1970, 19–50.Google Scholar
  9. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung: Produktionsvolumen und Produktionsfaktoren der Industrie im Gebiet der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Statistische Kennziffern, 15. Folge, and previous issues, Berlin 1974.Google Scholar
  10. Diewert, W.E.: An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function, Journal of Political Economy79, 1971, 481–507.Google Scholar
  11. -: Homogeneous Weak Separability and Exact Index Numbers, Tech. Report 122, IMSSS, January 1974(a).Google Scholar
  12. -: Applications of Duality Theory in: Frontiers of Quantitative Economics. Ed by M. Intrilligator and D. Kendrick, Vol.2, Amsterdam 1974(b).Google Scholar
  13. Gorman, W.M.: Separable Utility and Aggregation, Econometrica27, 1959, 469–481.Google Scholar
  14. Hudson, E.A., andD.W. Jorgenson: U.S. Energy Policy and Economic Growth. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science5, 1975, 461–514.Google Scholar
  15. Jorgenson, D.W., andL.J. Lau: Duality and Differentiability in Production, Journal of Economic Theory9, 1974, 23–42.Google Scholar
  16. -: The Duality of Technology and Economic Behaviour, Review of Economic Studies, 1974, 181–200.Google Scholar
  17. -: Duality and Technology, Amsterdam 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Jorgenson, D.W., E.R. Berndt, L.R. Christensen, andE.A. Hudson: U.S. Energy Resources and Economic Growth, Final Report to the Energy Policy Project, Washington, September 1973.Google Scholar
  19. Kirner, W.: Zeitreihen für das Anlagevermögen der Wirtschaftsbereiche in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, DIW-Beiträge zur Strukturforschung, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin 1968.Google Scholar
  20. Krengel, R., J. Schintke, P. Stäglin, J.P. Weiβ, andH. Wessel: Jährliche nominale Input-Output-Tabellen und Importmatrizen für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1954 bis 1967, and Input-Output and Import Relationships at Current and Constant Prices for the FRG, 1954–1967, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin 1972.Google Scholar
  21. Lau, L.J.: Duality and the Structure of Utility Functions Journal of Economic Theory1, 1969, 374–396.Google Scholar
  22. Leontief, W.W.: Introduction to a Theory of the Internal Structure of Functional Relationships Econometrica15, 1947, 361–373.Google Scholar
  23. Malinvaud, E.: Statistical Methods of Econometrics, second ed., Amsterdam 1970.Google Scholar
  24. Shephard, R.W.: Cost and Production Functions, Princeton 1953.Google Scholar
  25. -: Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton 1970.Google Scholar
  26. Skolka, J.: Importwachstum und Wirtschaftsstruktur — Eine Untersuchung auf Grund der österreichischen Input-Output-Tabellen 1964 und 1970, Empirica1, 1975, 79–110.Google Scholar
  27. Sono, M.: The Effect of Price Changes on the Demand and Supply of Separable Goods 1945, translation in: International Economic Review2, 1961, 239–275.Google Scholar
  28. Stäglin, R.: Aufstellung von Input-Output-Tabellen, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin 1968.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Rudolf Liebing GmbH + Co. 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Conrad
    • 1
  • R. Fahrion
    • 2
  1. 1.University of BonnBonn
  2. 2.Alfred Weber-InstitutUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelberg

Personalised recommendations