Skip to main content

The cytological history of Watercress (Nasturtium officinale R. Br.)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Literature cited

  1. 1.

    Apuleus Platonicus. Herbarium. Cap. XXI. 11th century, in Leechdoms, Wortcunning and Starcraft of Early England. Cockayne, O. London 18641, 117.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Babington, C. C., 1922. Manual of British Botany. 10th ed. London.

  3. 3.

    Bergier, A., 1750. In Suite de la Matière médicale deM. Geoffroy. Paris.

  4. 4.

    Blackburn, K. B., 1933. On the relation between geographical races and polyploidy inSilene ciliata. Genetica15, 50–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Blytt, A., 1905. Haandbog i Norges Flora. Oslo.

  6. 6.

    Boissier, E., 1867. Flora Orientalis1, Basileae.

  7. 7.

    Bonfons, 1545. Les cent et sept cries de Paris. Paris. quoted by Dorveaux 1917.

  8. 8.

    Chatin, A., 1866. Le Cresson. Paris.

  9. 9.

    Collins, J. L., 1933. Morphological and Cytological Characters of Triploid Pineapples. Cytologia4, 248–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Curtis, W., 1777. Flora Londinensis. London3, 404.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Darlington, C. D., 1932. Chromosomes and Plant Breeding. London.

  12. 12.

    Deputation of the Caledonian Hort. Soc. 1823. Journal of a Horticultural Tour through some parts of Flanders, Holland and the North of France in the autumn of 1817. Edinburgh.

  13. 13.

    Dioscorides (P.). First century A. D. Dioscoridis libri octo Graece et Latine. Castigiones in eosdem libros (byJ. Goupil) Paris, 1549. Liber II, Cap. CLVI.

  14. 14.

    Dorveaux, P., 1917. Le Cresson de Cailly..... Bull. des Sciences Pharmacologiques24, 366–372.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Fuchs, L., 1542. De Historia Stirpium. Basle, 723.

  16. 16.

    Glenney, W. W., 1897. Watercress: its history and cultivation. Journ. Roy. Agr. Soc. 3rd series,8, 607–622.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Halle, A. von, 1768. Historia Stirpium Indigenarum Helvetiae Inchoata. Bern1, 209.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hanbury, W. 1770. A Complete Body of Planting and Gardening. London.

  19. 19.

    Hayek, A. von, 1911. Entwurf eines Cruciferen-Systems auf phylogenetische Grundlage. Beih. z. bot. Centralbl.27, 127.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hegi, G., 1927 (?). Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa4, Teil 1.

  21. 21.

    Heilbronn, A., 1932. Polyploidie und Generationswechsel. Ber. d. deutsch. bot. Ges.50, 289.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hibberd, S., 1875. Pot Culture of the Watercress. Gardiner's Chronicle. 18752, 616.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    - 1878. Home Culture of the Watercress. London.

  24. 24.

    Hooker, J. D., 1870. The Student's Flora of the British Isles. London.

  25. 25.

    Jaretzky, R., 1932. Beziehungen zwischen Chromosomenzahl und Systematik bei den Cruciferen. Jahrb. f. wiss. Bot.76, 488.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ker, H. B., 1821. Account of the Cultivation of Water Cress, as practiced by Mr.William Bradbury. Trans of the Hort. Soc. London4, 537.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lindman, C. A. M., 1926. Svensk Fanerogam Flora. Stockholm.

  28. 28.

    Manton, I., 1932. Introduction to the general cytology of the Cruciferae. Annals of Bot.46, 515.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    , 1934. The Problem ofBiscutella laevigata L. Zeitschr. f. indukt. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.67, 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Melicocq, M. le Baron, 1858. De la Culture du Cresson en Artois au Moyen Age. Bull. d. l. soc. bot. de France5, 743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Meurman, O., 1929.Prunus laurocerasus a species showing high Polyploidy. J. of Genetics21, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Miller's Gardiner's Dictionary. London 6th ed., 1752.

  33. 33.

    Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. 1932. Bulletin no. 55. Salad Crops. London.

  34. 34.

    Muschler, R., 1912. Manual Flora of Egypt.1, 400. Berlin.

  35. 35.

    Pharmacopoeas: — (England) Pharmacopoeia Londinensis 3rd ed., 1627 (1, 1618).

  36. 36.

    - (Scotland) Pharmacopoeia Edinburgensis 1st ed., 1722, p. 13.

  37. 37.

    - (France) Pharmacopée Universelle par Nicolas Lemery. Paris 2nd ed., 1716, p. 791.

  38. 38.

    - Codex med. seu Pharmacopeia Parisiensis by Boyer, M. J. B., 1758, p. 82.

  39. 39.

    - (Denmark) Pharmacopoeia Danica. 1772. Hauniae, p. 44.

  40. 40.

    Piers Plowman. 14th century. TextC. Pass 9, 322, in Early English Text Soc.54. London 1873, p. 155.

  41. 41.

    Sansome, F. W. andPhilp, J., 1932. Recent Advances in Plant Genetics. London.

  42. 42.

    Schmalhausen, J., 1895. Flora of the Southern Plains of Russia (in Russian). Kiev.

  43. 43.

    Sickler, J. V., 1802. Die Deutsche Landwirtschaft in ihrem ganzen Umfange nach den neuesten Erfahrungen. Erfurt.

  44. 44.

    Stefansson, S., 1924. Flora Islands, 2nd ed. Copenhagen.

  45. 45.

    Thury, M. leVicomte, H. de, 1835. Rapport sur la Culture du Cresson dans la Cressonnerie artificielle de M. J. M. E.Cardon. Ann. de la soc. d'hort. Paris17, 77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

With 11 Text-figures and Plate I and II

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manton, I. The cytological history of Watercress (Nasturtium officinale R. Br.). Z.Ver-erbungslehre 69, 132–157 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01762872

Download citation

Keywords

  • Chromosome Number
  • Wild Species
  • Wild Plant
  • British Isle
  • Meiotic Division