Abstract
The writer questions whether it is legitimate to take the institutional, ecclesiastical, and ecclesiological settings of pastoral care as a starting point for understanding it. He responds negatively since the struggle for liberation is a social, economic, and political one and mental distress reflects the individual's relation to this world. Thus the relation between the institutional church and the sociopolitical realities is ambiguous and it sometimes obscures the conflict between the rich and the poor, the powerless and the powerful, and so on. There follows an analysis of the institutional setting of pastoral care as it functions to mediate grace, provide interpretations, and give moral advice, with an attempt to discern to whom this care is offered. Several observations are made on the ways a theology of liberation might delineate the problems of pastoral care. The area must be understood politically as communal creative activity, aiming, in the midst of shared suffering, to transfigure the world.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
He is an acknowledged spokesman for the theology of liberation and has publishedA Theology of Human Hope andTomorrow's Child (Harper, 1972).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alves, R. Personal wholeness and political creativity: The theology of liberation and pastoral care. Pastoral Psychol 26, 124–136 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01759807
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01759807