Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 571–595 | Cite as

Orthographic onsets as functional units of adult word recognition

  • Judith A. Bowey
Article

Abstract

Five experiments are described. Experiments 1 to 3 used a case-change methodology to test the hypothesis that orthographic onsets serve as units of visual word recognition. It was assumed that presenting words in mixed case would disrupt processing more strongly when the case change occurred within a subunit of word recognition than when the case change occurred between subunits of word recognition. The orthographic onset hypothesis was supported in two of three experiments. The sensitivity of the case-change methodology as a means of testing the orthographic onset hypothesis was examined in two further experiments using case change to disrupt orthographic rimes. Again, mixed results were observed. Given the abundance of evidence that, for skilled readers, ortho-graphic rimes serve as functional units of print and independent arguments that the case-change methodology represents an inherently conservative test of hypotheses concerning multiletter units of print, the current results provide preliminary evidence for the ortho-graphic onset as a functional unit of print.

Keywords

Cognitive Psychology Current Result Word Recognition Mixed Result Functional Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, M. J. (1979). Models of word recognition.Cognitive Psychology, 11, 133–176.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386–393.Google Scholar
  3. Besner, D., Coltheart, M., & Davelaar, E. (1984). Basic processes in reading: Computation of abstract letter identities.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 126–134.Google Scholar
  4. Besner, D., Davelaar, E., Alcott, D., & Parry, P. (1984). Wholistic reading of alphabetic print: Evidence from the FDM and the FBI. In L. Henderson, (Ed.),Orthographies and reading (pp. 121–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Besner, D., & Johnson, J. C. (1989). Reading and the mental lexicon: On the uptake of visual information. In W. Marlsen-Wilson (Ed.),Lexical representation and process (pp. 291–316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Besner, D., & McCann, R. S. (1987). Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and Performance XII (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Bowey, J. A. (1990). Orthographic onsets and rimes as functional units of reading.Memory & Cognition, 18, 419–427.Google Scholar
  8. Bowey, J. A. (1993) Orthographic rime priming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 247–271.Google Scholar
  9. Bowey, J. A. (1996). The phonological recoding of nonword orthographic rime primes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 117–131.Google Scholar
  10. Further evidence that orthographic rime usage in nonword reading increases with word-level reading proficiency.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  11. Bowey, J. A., & Hansen, J. (1994). The development of orthographic rimes as units of word recognition.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 465–488.Google Scholar
  12. Bowey, J., & Underwood, N. (1995, March).The development of body unit usage in children's nonword reading. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development conference, Indianopolis.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, G. D. A. (1987). Resolving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming.Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 1–23.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, G. D. A., & Watson, F. L. (1994). Spelling-to-sound effects in single-word reading.British Journal of Psychology, 85, 181–202.Google Scholar
  15. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968).The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  16. Claxton, G. L. (1974). Initial consonant groups function as units in word production.Language and Speech, 17, 271–277.Google Scholar
  17. Coltheart, M., & Freeman, R. (1974). Case alternation impairs word identification.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 102–104.Google Scholar
  18. Coltheart, V., & Leahy, J. (1992). Children's and adults' reading of nonwords: Effects of regularity and consistency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 718–729.Google Scholar
  19. Cutler, A., Butterfield, S., & Williams, J. N. (1987). The perceptual integrity of syllabic onsets.Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 406–418.Google Scholar
  20. Drewnowski, A., & Healy, A. F. (1980). Missing-ing in reading: Letter detection errors on word endings.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 247–262.Google Scholar
  21. Forster, K. I., & Taft, M. (1994). Bodies, antibodies, and neighborhood density effects in masked form priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 844–863.Google Scholar
  22. Fudge, E. C. (1969). Syllables.Journal of Linguistics, 5, 253–286.Google Scholar
  23. Fudge, E. (1987). Branching structure within the syllable.Journal of Linguistics, 23, 359–377.Google Scholar
  24. Healy, A. F. (1976). Detection errors on the wordthe: Evidence for reading units larger than letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 235–242.Google Scholar
  25. Kucera, J., & Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Levitt, A., Healy, A. F., & Fendrich, D. W. (1991). Syllable-internal structure and the sonority hierarchy: Differential evidence from lexical decision, naming, and reading.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 337–363.Google Scholar
  27. MacKay, D. G. (1972). The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech.Cognitive Psychology, 3, 210–227.Google Scholar
  28. McCelland, J. L. (1976). Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 80–91.Google Scholar
  29. Pring, L. (1981). Phonological codes and functional spelling units: Reality and implications.Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 573–578.Google Scholar
  30. Rosson, M. B. (1985). The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations in reading aloud.Memory & Cognition, 13, 90–99.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, F., Lott, D., & Cronnell, B. (1969). The effect of type size and case alternation on word identification.American Journal of Psychology, 82, 248–253.Google Scholar
  32. Taft, M. (1992). The Body of the BOSS: Subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1004–1014.Google Scholar
  33. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation.Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608–631.Google Scholar
  34. Treiman, R. (1989). The internal structure of the syllable. In G. Carlson & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.),Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 27–52). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  35. Treiman, R. (1994). To what extent do orthographic units in print mirror phonological units in speech?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 91–110.Google Scholar
  36. Treiman, R., & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset- and rime-like units in printed words? In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII (pp. 281–298). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Treiman, R., Goswami, U., & Bruck, M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory.Memory & Cognition, 18, 559–567.Google Scholar
  38. Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1988). Units in reading and spelling.Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 466–477.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith A. Bowey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations