Knowledge-based selection and sequencing of hole-making operations for prismatic parts

  • G. C. Vosniakos
  • B. J. Davies
Article

Abstract

This paper describes the rule structure used to select the appropriate sequence of operations to produce various types of holes in 2 1/2D prismatic components manufactured on machining centres. Operation selection is based on forward chained rules coded in Prolog. A different rule priority sequence is applicable depending on the rule fired last. This solves the conflict resolution problem and ensures reasonably fast execution. Rule conditions perform feature extraction, feature size checks, operation suitability checks, tool suitability checks and processing status checks. Actions perform the processing operations and update the model through feature processing tags. The knowledge base implemented for hole-making was not obtained from a practical industrial environment. Nevertheless it does produce sensible plans and it is relatively easy to modify.

Keywords

Process planning Prismatic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I. Ham and S. C.-Y. Lu, “Computer-aided process planning: the present and the future”,Annals of the CIRP,37(2), pp. 591–601, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Matsushima, N. Okada and T. Sata, “The integration of CAD and CAM by application of artificial intelligence techniques”,Annals of the CIRP,31(1), pp. 329–332, 1982.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. J. A. M. van Houten and A. H. van't Erve, “PART: a parallel approach to computer aided process planning”,Proc. 4th International Conference on Computer Aided Production Engineering, ed. J. A. McGeough, pp. 281–288, Edinburgh, November 1988.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. R. Henderson and G.-J. Chang, “FRAPP: automated feature recognition and process planning from solid modelling data”,Proc. 1988 ASME Conference, Computers in Engineering, ed. V. A. Tipnis and E. M. Patton, vol. 1, pp. 529–536, San Francisco, Calif., July 1988.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Husbands, G. G. Mill, A. J. F. Simpson and S. Warrington, “Representation, reasoning and decision making in the process planning of complex components”,Proc. 5th International Conference on Computer Aided Production Engineering, Edinburgh, November 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. K. Allen, “Computer-aided process planning: software tools”,Proc. Winter Annual Meeting of the ASME; Integrated and Intelligent Manufacturing, ed. C. R. Liu and T.-C. Chang, pp. 391–400, Anaheim, Calif., December 1986.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. S. Liu and R. Allen, “A user-oriented, frame-based approach to computer-aided process planning”,Proc. 4th International Conference on Computer Aided Production Engineering, ed. J. A. McGeough, pp. 289–292, Edinburgh, November 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Hayes, “Observing the machinist's planning methods: using goal interactions to guide search”,Proc. 9th Cognitive Science Meeting, pp. 952–958, Seattle, July 1987.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.-F. Chen and Y. Ito, “A proposal of database structure for automated process planning with expert system”,Proc. 15th NAMRC, pp. 523–527, 1987.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. C. Vosniakos, “An intelligent automatic interface of computeraided design with manufacture for 21/2D prismatic parts”, Ph.D. Thesis, UMIST, July 1991.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. T. Joseph, “Knowledge acquisition and implementation in an expert process planning system”, Ph.D. Thesis, UMIST, July 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. C. Vosniakos
    • 1
  • B. J. Davies
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUMISTManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations