Abstract
We investigate possible constructions of choice procedures (social choice functions) for committees (simple games). The notion of a capacity of a committee is derived from our construction. We determine the capacity of strong, symmetric and weak simple games. We also provide an upper bound on the capacity of a simple game without veto players.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Black, R.D.: The Theory of Committees and Elections, Cambridge 1958.
Blin, J.-M., andM.A. Satterthwaite: Individual Decisions and Group Decisions: The Fundamental Differences. Forthcoming, 1975.
Bott, R.: Symmetric Solutions to Majority Games. Annals of Mathematics Study28, 1953, 319–323.
Dutta, B., andP.K. Pattanaik: On Nicely Consistent Voting Systems. Econometrica46, 1978, 163–170.
Gibbard, A.: Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result. Econometrica41, 1973, 587–601.
Nakamura, K.: The Core of a Simple Game with Ordinal Preferences. International Journal of Game Theory4, 1975, 95–104.
-: The Vetoers in a Simple Game with Ordinal Preferences. To appear in International Journal of Game Theory, 1976.
Peleg, B.: Consistent Voting Systems. Econometrica46, 1978, 153–161.
Plott, C.R.: Path Independence, Rationality and Social Choice. Econometrica41, 1973, 1075–1091.
Sen, A.: Social Choice Theory: A Re-examination. Econometrica45, 1977, 53–89.
Shapley, L.S.: Simple Games: An Outline of the Descriptive Theory. Behavioral Science7, 1962, 59–66.
-: Compound Simple Games, III: On Committees. The Rand Corporation, RM-5438-PR, 1967.
Wilson, R.B.: The Game-Theoretic Structure of Arrow's General Possibility Theorem. Journal of Economic Theory5, 1972, 14–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peleg, B. Representations of simple games by social choice functions. Int J Game Theory 7, 81–94 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01753237
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01753237