Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial organization of captive monkeys (Macaca nemestrina)

  • Reports
  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An artificial group of 18 pigtailed monkeys, selected by sex and size (age) to simulate the composition of natural groups of macaques, was formed. All were strangers to each other. Observations were made over five months. Data on the monkeys' resting and clustering locations in the compound were analyzed in two ways.

Spatial organization emerged about one month after the group was formed when the group acquired a competent leader. The leader, certain high ranking females, and/or females in estrus were seen consistently in a geographically central area of the compound and therefore were termed central monkeys. This central subgroup, coherent in terms of area and roles, persisted throughout the study. Development of increased group structure was also indicated by increased stability of dyadic affectional relationships.

The study indicates that social organization of the pigtailed macaque will develop when some of the environmental and prior experience variables are controlled. The results highlighted the leader's role and suggest that it is at least as essential in social organization as kinship and factors inherent in a natural environment. Estrous cycles of females and seasonal variations of temperature in the compound were other factors affecting spatial and social relationships of the group members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, B. K. &J. M. Bowers, 1968. The social behavior of Japanese macaques in the corral.Primate News 6: 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, S. A., 1965. Sociobiology of Rhesus monkeys. II: Stochastics of social communication.J. Theoret. Biol. 8: 490–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furuya, Y., 1865. Social organization of the crab eating monkey.Primates 6: 285–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imanishi, K., 1960. Social organization of subhuman primates in their natural habitat.Curr. Anthrop. 1: 393–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itani, J., 1954. Takasakiyama no Saru. (Japanese monkeys in Takasakiyama), In:Nihon Dobutsu-ki II,K. Imanishi (ed.), Kobunsha, Tokyo. 21–200. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, P., 1965. The common langur of North India. In:Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes, I. DeVore (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 197–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, L. A., I. D. Kaufman, &A. J. Stynes, 1964. Individual distance in two species of macaque.Anim. Behav. 12: 338–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick, C. H., J. A. Beg, &M. R. Siddiqi, 1965. Rhesus monkeys on North India. In:Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes I. DeVore (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 111–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokuda, K. &G. D. Jensen, 1969. Dominance hierarchy formation of pigtailed monkeys (Macaca nemestrina).Primates 10: 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, 1968. Sexual behavior in a captive group of pigtailed monkeys (Macaca nemestrina).Primates 9: 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbergh, J. G., 1966. Rhesus monkey bands.Nat. Hist., N. Y. 75: 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen, G.D., Tokuda, K. Spatial organization of captive monkeys (Macaca nemestrina). Primates 15, 75–83 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01749594

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01749594

Keywords

Navigation