Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 39–46 | Cite as

The development of peer-mate relationships in Japanese macaque infants

  • Kohshi Norikoshi
Article

Abstract

The play behavior of Japanese macaque infants was studied for 6 months at Arashiyama, Japan. Three types of play were identified. The first (solitary play) was observed in five to 12-week old infants. The second type of play (parallel play) was observed in infants from 12 to 21 weeks old. After the 12th week, the third type of play (associate play) was seen. At this point the infants seldom played without partners. It is in associate play that dominant and submissive behavior may be seen, and from which dominance relations may be assumed. It is said that the rank of a 12 week-old infant parallels that of its mother.

Keywords

Animal Ecology Dominance Relation Play Behavior Submissive Behavior Solitary Play 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fady, J. C., 1969. Les jeux sociaux: le compagnon de jeux chez les jeunes. Observations chezMacaca irus.Folia primat. 11: 134–143.Google Scholar
  2. Harlow, H. F., 1962. The heterosexual affectional system in monkeys.Amer. Psychol., 17: 1–9.Google Scholar
  3. ——, 1962. Social deprivation in monkeys.Sci. Amer. 207: 137–146.Google Scholar
  4. Hazama, N., 1962. On the weight-measurement of wild Japanese monkeys at Arashiyama.Bull. Iwatayama Monkey Park, No. 1. (in Japanese) Partly translated into English in 1964 with the following title: Weighing wild Japanese monkeys in Arashiyama.Primates 5: 81–104.Google Scholar
  5. Kawabe, S., 1965. A study of Japanese monkeys raised in isolation—Development ofQuol andRika for the first 8 months after their birth. In:Saru (Monkeys and Apes),S. Kawamura &J. Itani (eds.), Chuokoron-sha, Tokyo, pp. 455. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. Kawamura, S., 1958. Matriarchal social ranks in the Minoo-B troop: A study of the rank system of Japanese monkeys.Primates 1: 149–156.Google Scholar
  7. Koford, C. B., 1963. Rank of mothers and sons in bands of rhesus monkeys.Science 141: 356–357.Google Scholar
  8. Koyama, N., 1966. Rank and play of a wild Japanese monkey troop in Arashiyama. Osaka City University (Unpublished master thesis) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. ——, 1967. On dominance rank and kinship of a wild Japanese monkey troop in Arashiyama.Primates 8: 189–216.Google Scholar
  10. ——, 1970. Changes in dominance rank and division of a wild Japanese monkey troop in Arashiyama.Primates 11: 335–390.Google Scholar
  11. Mason, W. A., 1960. The effects of social restriction on the behavior of rhesus monkeys: 1 Free social behavior.J. comp. Physiol. Psychol. 53: 582–589.Google Scholar
  12. Nakajima, K., 1958. A wild troop of Japanese monkeys in Arashiyama.Yaen, 1. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  13. --, 1964. The lineage of Arashiyama troop. (mineo)Google Scholar
  14. Rosenblum, L. A., 1961. The development of social behavior in the rhesus monkey. Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Wisconsin. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan, No. 61-3158.Google Scholar
  15. Sade, D. S., 1967. Determinants of dominance in a group of free-ranging rhesus monkeys. In:Social Communication among Primates,S. A. Altman (ed.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 99–114.Google Scholar
  16. Yerkes, R. M &J. H. Elder, 1963. Oestrus, receptive, and mating in chimpanzee.Comp. Psychol. Monogr. 13: 1–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kohshi Norikoshi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceOsaka City UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations