Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of “pathologic” prosthetic valve stenosis via exercise Doppler echocardiography

  • Originals
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To detect borderline mitral valve dysfunction in asymptomatic patients, with Björk-Shiley valves, we studied the patients' hemodynamics at rest and during exercise by Doppler echocardiography. Supine bicycle exercise was performed by 65 patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to the measurements of the exercise Doppler echocardiography: a normally functioning group (n = 45) and a borderline group (n = 20). The valve area at rest was 2.0 ± 0.6, 2.1 ± 0.7, and 2.3 ± 0.5cm2 with valve sizes of 25, 27, and 29 mm, respectively, in the normal group and 1.9 ± 0.5, 1.9 ± 0.4, and 2.1 ± 0.3 cm2 in the borderline group. The mitral valve area did not significantly change with exercise in either group. In the normal group, peak gradients increased from 9.9 ± 3.5, 9.7 ± 1.1, and 9.5 ± 1.6 mmHg with valve sizes of 25, 27, and 29 mm, respectively, at rest to 15.1 ± 3.1, 14.0 ± 3.3, and 14.8 ± 2.6 mmHg with exercise. Mean gradients increased from 5.2 ± 1.2, 5.9 ± 1.3, and 5.8 ± 1.8 mmHg with valve sizes of 25, 27, and 29 mm, respectively, at rest to 8.0 ± 2.5, 9.1 ± 2.0, and 8.8 ± 1.6 mmHg with exercise. In the borderline group, peak gradients increased from 10.5 ± 3.1, 10.1 ± 2.1, and 10.8 ± 1.7 mmHg with valve sizes of 25, 27, and 29 mm, respectively, at rest to 24.5 ± 4.2, 23.6 ± 4.4, and 22.4 ± 3.2 mmHg with exercise. The mean gradients increased from 5.8 ± 1.8, 6.0 ± 1.9, and 6.1 ± 1.6 mmHg, at rest to 13.4 ± 2.8, 13.4 ± 2.3, and 12.5 ± 2.2 mmHg after exercise. The increase in both peak and mean gradients with exercise (exercise — resting gradient) in the borderline group (more than 10 mmHg and more than 5 mmHg, respectively) was significantly higher than that in the normal group. Four of the 65 patients underwent reoperation for valve dysfunction due to pannus formation. All 4 of these patients were in the borderline group. Hemodynamic characteristics in the borderline stenotic patients were revealed by exercise. Exercise Doppler echocardiographic measurements can predict a concealed “pathologic” prosthetic valve stenosis in asymptomatic patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilkins GT, Gillam LD, Kritzer GL, Levine RA, Palacios IF, Weyman AE (1986) Validation of continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurements of mitral and tricuspid prosthetic valve gradients: A simultaneous Doppler-catheter study. Circulation 74:786–795

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burstow DJ, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR, Reeder GS, Holmes DR, Seward JB, Tajik AJ (1989) Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurement of prosthetic valve gradients: A simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study. Circulation 80:504–514

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baumgartner H, Khan S, DeRobertis M, Czer L, Maurer G (1992) Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: An in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:324–332

    Google Scholar 

  4. Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R (1976) Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: Echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence or absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol 37:7–11

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karliner JS, Gault JH, Eckberg DL, Mullins CB, Ross J Jr (1971) Mean velocity of fiber shortening: A simplified measure of left ventricular myocardial contractility. Circulation 44:323–333

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holen J, Simonsen S, Froysaker T (1979) An ultrasound Doppler technique for the noninvasive determination of the pressure gradient in the Björk-Shiley mitral valve. Circulation 59:436–442

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hatle L, Brubakk A, Tromsdal A, Angelsen B (1978) Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J 40:131–140

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hatle L, Angelsen B (1982) Doppler ultrasound in cardiology. Lea and Febinger, Philadelphia, p 83

    Google Scholar 

  9. Panadis IP, Ross J, Mintz GS (1987) Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 8:317–326

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alam M, Rosman HS, Lakier JB, Kemp S, Khaja F, Hautamaki K, Magilligan DJ, Stein PD (1987) Doppler and echocardiographic features of normal and dysfunctioning bioprosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 10:851–858

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reisner SA, Lichtenberg GS, Shapiro JR, Schwarz KQ, Meltzer RS (1989) Exercise Doppler echocardiography in patients with mitral prosthetic valves. Am Heart J 118:755–759

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leavitt JI, Coats MH, Falk RH (1991) Effects of exercise on transmitral gradient and pulmonary artery pressure in patients with mitral stenosis or a prosthetic mitral valve: A Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 17:1520–1526

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reisner SA, Meltzer RS (1988) Normal values of prosthetic valve Doppler echocardiographic parameters: A review. J Am Soc Echocardiography 1:201–210

    Google Scholar 

  14. Björk VO, Book K, Holmgran A (1973) Significance of position and opening angle of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve in mitral surgery. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 7:187–201

    Google Scholar 

  15. Planinc D, Jeric M, Mihatov S, Omcikus M, Pagon L, Rudar M (1991) Doppler evaluation of prosthetic mitral valves. Acta Cardiol 46:79–83

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shigenobu, M., Sano, S. Detection of “pathologic” prosthetic valve stenosis via exercise Doppler echocardiography. Heart Vessels 10, 35–40 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01745075

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01745075

Key words

Navigation