Abstract
Continuum-type optimality criteria for the iterative optimization of “large” finite element systems (i.e. systems with over ten thousand finite elements) are discussed. By investigating optimization problems with up to one million elements and one million variables, it is shown that for a single displacement constraint the proposed method results in a rapid and almost uniform convergence, the rate of which, even for relatively ill-conditioned problems, does not depend significantly on the number of elements. Additional refinements, including upper and lower limits on the cross-sectional dimensions, segmentation, allowance for selfweight and the cost of supports, non-linear and non-separable objective functions, inclusion of shear deformations, built-up cross-sections as well as additional stress constraints and two-dimensional (plane stress) problems, will be considered in Part II of this contribution. The current development constitutes an extension and generalization of pioneering work by Berke, Khot, Venkayya and their associates, whose methods are also reviewed herein. In addition to an elementary truss example and a more advanced beam example, some simple layout optimization problems are considered in this Part. A special feature of the paper is that all numerical results presented are confirmed by closed form analytical solutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett, R.L. 1961: Minimum weight design of beams for deflection.J. Engrg. Mech. ASCE 87, 75–109
Berke, L. 1970: An efficient approach to the minimum weight design of deflection limited structures.Rep. of Air Force Flight Dynamics Lab., Ohio, USA. AFFDL-TM-70-4
Berke, L.; Khot, N.S. 1987: Structural optimization using optimality criteria. In: Mota Soares, C.A. (ed.)Computer aided optimal design: structural and mechanical systems, pp. 271–312. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer
Berke, L.; Khot, N.S. 1988: Performance characteristics of optimality criteria methods. In: Rozvany, G.I.N.; Karihaloo, B.L. (eds.)Structural optimization (Proc. IUTAM Symposium, Melbourne, 1988), pp. 39–46. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Haftka, R.T.; Kamat, M.P. 1985:Elements of structural optimization, Dordrecht: Kluwer
Khot, N.S. 1982: Optimality criterion methods in structural optimization. In: Morris, A.J. (ed.)Foundations of structural optimization: a unified approach, pp. 99–236. Chichester: Wiley
Masur, E.F. 1975: Optimality in the presence of discreteness and discontinuity. In: Sawczyk, A.; Mroz, Z. (eds.)Optimization in structural design (IUTAM Symp., Warsaw 1973), pp. 441–453. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer
Rozvany, G.I.N. 1976:Optimal design of flexural systems: beams, grillages, slabs, plates and shells. Oxford: Pergamon. Russian version: 1980, Moscow: Stroiizdat
Rozvany, G.I.N. 1981: Variational methods and optimality criteria. In: Haug, E.J.; Cea, J. (eds.)Optimization of distributed parameter structures, Vol. I, pp. 82–111. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff
Rozvany, G.I.N. 1989:Structural design via optimality criteria (the Prager approach to structural optimization). Dordrecht: Kluwer
Rozvany, G.I.N.; Prager, W. 1979: A new class of structural optimization problems: optimal archgrids.Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 19, 127–150
Rozvany, G.I.N.; Rotthaus, M.; Spengemann, F.; Gollub, W.; Zhou, M.; Lawo, M.; Wang, C.M. 1989: On the Masur paradox.Mech. Struct. Machines, submitted
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rozvany, G.I.N., Zhou, M., Rotthaus, M. et al. Continuum-type optimality criteria methods for large finite element systems with a displacement constraint. Part I. Structural Optimization 1, 47–72 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743809
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743809