Skip to main content
Log in

A method for structural optimization which combines secondorder approximations and dual techniques

  • Technical Papers
  • Published:
Structural optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A structural optimization problem is usually solved iteratively as a sequence of approximate design problems. Traditionally, a variety of approximation concepts are used, but lately second-order approximation strategies have received most interest since high quality approximations can be obtained in this way. Furthermore, difficulties in choosing tuning parameters such as step-size restrictions may be avoided in these approaches. Methods that utilize second-order approximations can be divided into two groups; in the first, a Quadratic Programming (QP) subproblem including all available second-order information is stated, after which it is solved with a standard QP method, whereas the second approach uses only an approximate QP subproblem whose underlying structure can be efficiently exploited. In the latter case, only the diagonal terms of the second-order information are used, which makes it possible to adopt dual methods that require separability. An advantage of the first group of methods is that all available second-order information is used when stating the approximate problem, but a disadvantage is that a rather difficult QP subproblem must be solved in each iteration. The second group of methods benefits from the possibility of using efficient dual methods, but lacks in not using all available information. In this paper, we propose an efficient approach to solve the QP problems, based on the creation of a sequence of fully separable subproblems, each of which is efficiently solvable by dual methods. This procedure makes it possible to combine the advantages of each of the two former approaches. The numerical results show that the proposed solution procedure is a valid approach to solve the QP subproblems arising in second-order approximation schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman, H.M.; Haftka, R.T. 1986: Sensitivity analysis of discrete structural systems.AIAA J. 24, 823–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazaraa, M. S.; Shetty, C. M. 1979:Nonlinear programming. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Belegundu, A.D.; Arora, J.S. 1984: A recursive quadratic programming method with active set strategy for optimal design.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 20, 803–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K.K.; Haug, E.J.; Hou, J.W.; Sohoni, V.N. 1983: Pshenichnyj's linearization method for mechanical system optimization.J. Mech. Trans. Auto. Des. 105, 97–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C. 1979: Structural weight optimization by dual methods of convex programming.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 14, 1761–1783

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C. 1989a: First and second order approximation strategies in structural optimization.Struct. Optim. 1, 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C. 1989b: CONLIN: an efficient dual optimizer based on convex approximation concepts.Struct. Optim. 1, 81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C.; Braibant, V. 1985: Structural optimization: a new dual method using mixed variables.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 23, 409–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C.; Schmit, L.A. 1980: Primal and dual methods in structural optimization.J. Struct. Div. 106, 1117–1133

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C.; Smaoui, H. 1988: Convex approximation strategies in structural optimization. In: Eschenauer, H.A.; Thierauf, G. (eds.)Discretization methods and structural optimization - procedures and applications, pp. 118–126. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M.; Wolfe, P. 1956: An algorithm for quadratic programming.Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 3, 95–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R.E.; Stewart, R.A. 1961: A non-linear programming technique for the optimization of continuous processing systems.Management Science 7, 379–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S.P. 1976: Superlinearly convergent variable metric algorithms for general nonlinear programming problems.Mathematical Programming 11, 263–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S.P. 1977: A globally convergent method for nonlinear programming.J. Optimiz. Theory Appl. 22, 297–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, U. 1981:Optimum structural design. New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, Ö.; Larsson, T. 1990: A note on step-size restrictions in approximation procedures for structural optimization.Comp. & Struct. 37, 259–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, T.; Migdalas, A. 1990: An algorithm for nonlinear programs over Cartesian product sets.Optimization 21, 535–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, O.K.; Arora, J.S. 1986: An active set RQP algorithm for engineering design optimization.Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 57, 51–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Pshenichnyj, B.N. 1970: Algorithms for the general problem of mathematical programming.Kibernetica 5, 120–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Pshenichnyj, B.N. 1987: The linearization method.Optimization 18, 179–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwei, X.; Peng, L. 1987: Structural optimization based on second-order approximations of functions and dual theory.Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 65, 101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringertz, U.T. 1988:A mathematical programming approach to structural optimization. Doctoral Thesis, Report No. 88-24, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Schittkowski, K. 1983: On the convergence of a sequential quadratic programming method.Optimization 14, 197–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, L.A.; Fleury, C. 1980: Structural synthesis by combining approximation concepts and dual methods.AIAA J. 18, 1252–1260

    Google Scholar 

  • Starnes, J.H.; Haftka, R.T. 1979: Preliminary design of composite wings for bucklings, strength and displacement constraints.J. Aircraft 16, 564–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Svanberg, K. 1982: An algorithm for optimum structural design using duality.Mathematical Programming Study 20, 161–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Svanberg, K. 1987: The method of moving asymptotes - a new method for structural optimization.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 24, 359–373

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Panne, C. 1975:Methods for linear and quadratic programming. Amsterdam: North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.B. 1963:A simplicial method for concave programming. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, T.H. 1986: Space frame optimization subject to frequency constraints.Proc. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 27th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf., pp. 103–115

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larsson, T., Rönnqvist, M. A method for structural optimization which combines secondorder approximations and dual techniques. Structural Optimization 5, 225–232 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743583

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743583

Keywords

Navigation