Structural optimization

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 86–93 | Cite as

On shape sensitivity approaches in the numerical analysis of structures

  • K. Dems
  • Z. Mróz
Technical Papers

Abstract

The semi-analytical, analytical and direct methods for numerical structural shape sensitivity analysis are discussed for a beam model and the general three-dimensional case. While the two first methods are applied directly to the finite element model of a structure, the direct approach follows from a continuous formulation and only the final results can be discretized.

Keywords

Sensitivity Analysis Civil Engineer Element Model Finite Element Model Direct Approach 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barthelemy, B.; Chon, C.T.; Haftka, R.T. 1988: Sensitivity approximation of static structural response.Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 4, 249–265Google Scholar
  2. Barthelemy, B.; Haftka, R.T. 1988: Accuracy analysis of the semianalytical method for shape sensitivity calculation.AIAA Paper 88-2284, Proc. 29th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf., Part 1, pp. 562–581Google Scholar
  3. Cheng, G.; Gu, Y.; Zhou, Y. 1989: Accuracy of semi-analytic sensitivity analysis.Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 6, 113–128Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, G.; Liu, Y. 1987: A new computational scheme for sensitivity analysis.Eng. Opt. 12, 219–235Google Scholar
  5. Cheng, G.; Olhoff, N. 1993: New method of error analysis and detection in semi-analytical sensitivity analysis. In: Rozvany, G.I.N. (ed.)Optimization of large structural systems, pp. 361–384 (Proc. NATO ASI held in Berchtesgarden, Germany, 1991). Dordrecht: KluwerGoogle Scholar
  6. Dems, K.; Haftka, R.T. 1988–89: Two approaches to sensitivity analysis for shape variation of structures.Mech. Struct. & Mach. 16, 501–522Google Scholar
  7. Dems, K.; Mróz, Z. 1984: Variational approach by means of adjoint system to structural optimization and sensitivity analysis.Int. J Solids & Struct. 20, 527–552Google Scholar
  8. Haftka, R.T.; Adelman, H.M. 1989: Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis.Struct. Optim. 1, 137–151Google Scholar
  9. Haug, E.J.; Choi, K.K.; Komkov, V. 1986:Design sensitivity analysis of structural systems. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Olhoff, N.; Rasmussen, J. 1993: Method of error elimination for a class of semi-analytical sensitivity analysis problems. In: Rozvany, G.I.N. (ed.)Optimization of large structural systems, pp. 385–396 (Proc. NATO ASI held in Berchtesgarten, Germany, 1991). Dordrecht: KluwerGoogle Scholar
  11. Olhoff, N.; Rasmussen, J. Lund, E. 1992: Method of “exact” numerical differentiation for error elimination in finite element based semi-analytical shape sensitivity analysis.Aalborg Univ. Report 10, 1–79Google Scholar
  12. Pedersen, P.; Cheng, G.; Rasmussen, J. 1989: On accuracy problems for semi-analytical sensitivity analysis.Mech. Struct. & Mach. 6, 113–128Google Scholar
  13. Timoshenko, S.; Goodier, J.N. 1951:Theory of elasticity. New York: McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
  14. Zienkiewicz, O.C.; Campbell, J.S. 1973:Shape optimization and sequential linear programing, in optimum structural design, theory and applications. New York: Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Dems
    • 1
  • Z. Mróz
    • 2
  1. 1.Lódż Technical UniversityLódżPoland
  2. 2.Institute of Fundamental Technological ResearchPolish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations