Abstract
As has been shown in recent years, the approximate numerical differentiation of element stiffness matrices which is inherent in the semi-analytical method of finite element based design sensitivity analysis, may give rise to severely erroneous shape design sensitivities in static problems involving linearly elastic bending of beam, plate and shell structures.
This paper demonstrates that the error problem also manifests itself in semi-analytical sensitivity analyses of eigenvalues of such structures and presents a method for complete elimination of the error problem. The method, which yields “exact” numerical sensitivities on the basis of simple first-order numerical differentiation, is computationally inexpensive and easy to implement as an integral part of the finite element analysis.
The method is presented in terms of semi-analytical shape design sensitivity analysis of eigenvalues in the form of frequencies of free transverse vibrations of plates modelled by isoparametric Mindlin finite elements. Finally, the development is illustrated via two examples of occurrence of the error phenomenon when the traditional method is used and it is shown that the problem is completely eliminated by the application of the new method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barthelemy, B.; Haftka, R.T. 1990: Accuracy analysis of the semianalytical method for shape sensitivity analysis.Mech. Struct. Mach. 18, 407–432
Bratus, A.S.; Seyranian, A.P. 1983: Bimodal solutions in eigenvalue optimization problems.Prikl. Matem. Mekhan. 47, 546–554
Cheng, G.; Gu, Y.; Zhou, Y. 1989: Accuracy of semi-analytical sensitivity analysis.Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 6, 113–128
Cheng, G.; Liu, Y. 1987: A new computational scheme for sensitivity analysis.Eng. Opt. 12, 219–235
Cheng, G.; Olhoff, N. 1993: Rigid body motion test against error in semi-analytical sensitivity analysis.Comp. & Struct. 46, 515–527
Courant, R.; Hilbert, D. 1953:Methods of mathematical physics, (Volume 1). New York: Interscience Publishers
Fenyes, P.A.; Lust, R.V. 1991: Error analysis of semi-analytical displacement derivatives for shape and sizing variables.AIAA J. 29, 271–279
Haftka, R.T.; Adelman, H.M. 1989: Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis.Struct. Optim. 1, 137–151
Haug, E.J.; Choi, K.K.; Komkov, V. 1986:Design sensitivity analysis of structural systems. New York: Academic Press
Mlejnek, H.P. 1992: Accuracy of semi-analytical sensitivities and its improvement by the “natural method”.Struct. Optim. 4, 128–131
Olhoff, N.; Rasmussen, J. 1991: Study of inaccuracy in semianalytical sensitivity analysis - a model problem.Struct. Optim. 3, 203–213
Olhoff, N.; Rasmussen, J.; Lund, E. 1993: Method of “exact” numerical differentiation for error elimination in finite element based semi-analytical shape sensitivity analysis.Mech. Struct. Mach. 21, 1–66
Pedersen, P.; Cheng, G.; Rasmussen, J. 1989: On accuracy problems for semi-analytical sensitivity analysis.Mech. Struct. Mach. 17, 373–384
Zienkiewicz, O.C.; Campbell, J.S. 1973: Shape optimization and sequential linear programming. In: Gallagher, R.H.; Zienkiewicz, O.C. (eds.)Optimum structural design, theory and applications, pp. 109–126. London: Wiley and Sons
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lund, E., Olhoff, N. Shape design sensitivity analysis of eigenvalues using “exact” numerical differentiation of finite element matrices. Structural Optimization 8, 52–59 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01742934
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01742934