Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 7–36 | Cite as

Five years of strategic environmental assessment efforts at a research university: A case study of an organizational innovation

  • James C. Hearn
  • Richard M. Clugston
  • Richard B. Heydinger
Article

Abstract

This study examined the emergence and subsequent five-year history of “environmental scanning” at a large research university. Proponents of strategic approaches to management in organizations usually recommend environmental scanning as a necessary support for effective decision making. The technique seeks to build systematic understanding of the external environment of the organization, via ongoing reconnaissance of relevant developments in technology, the economy, the political and legal arenas, and the larger society. Scanning's fit with educational organizations may be problematic, however. Over time, scanning efforts on the campus studied here became less theory-based and less centralized, and scanning failed to become an institutionalized innovation. The difficulties in institutionalizing scanning are traced to six factors: limitations posed by organizational structure, an absence of powerful champions, constraints from the organizational culture, the existence of a “policy vacuum” surrounding scanning efforts, the daunting demands of such efforts themselves, and questionable articulation with the fundamental goals and mission of the institution. The analysis suggests that the generic scanning model seems unlikely to win acceptance in research universities without substantial modification.

Keywords

Cross Cultural Psychology Substantial Modification Strategic Approach Organizational Innovation Effective Decision 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aguilar, F. (1967).Scanning the Business Environment New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Alfred, R.L. & Weissman, J. (1987). Higher education and the public trust: Improving stature in colleges and universities.ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  3. Baldridge, J.V. (1971). Environmental pressure, professional autonomy, and coping strategies in academic organizations. In J.V. Baldridge (Ed.),Academic Governance (pp. 507–529). Berkeley: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  4. Baldridge, J.V. (1980). Managerial innovation: Rules for successful implementation.Journal of Higher Education, 51, March/April, 117–134.Google Scholar
  5. Baldridge, J.V. & Okimi, P.H. (1982). Strategic planning in higher education: New tool or new gimmick?AAHE Bulletin, October, 6, 15–18.Google Scholar
  6. Bourgeois, L. J. (1980). Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration.Academy of Management Review, 5, 25–39.Google Scholar
  7. Chaffee, E.E. (1985). The concept of strategy: From business to higher education. In J. Smart (Ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Volume I. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  8. Chase, W.H.Issues Management: Origins of the Future. Stamford, CT: Issue Action Publications, 1984.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, B.R. (1983).The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clugston, R.M. (1986). Strategic planning in an organized anarchy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, San Antonio, February.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, M. & March, J. (1974).Leadership and Ambiguity. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Cope, R. (1981a). Environmental assessments for strategic planning. In N.L. Poulton (Ed.), Evaluation of management and planning systems (pp. 5–15).New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 31. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Cope, R. (1981b). Strategic planning, management and decision making.AAHE/ERIC Research Report No. 9. Washington, D.C.: AAHE.Google Scholar
  14. Cope, R. (1987). Opportunity from strength: Strategic planning clarified with case examples.ASHE/ERIC Higher Education Reports No. 8. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  15. Corwin, R.G. & Louis, K.S. (1982). Organizational barriers to the utilization of research.Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 623–640.Google Scholar
  16. Dill, D.D. (1982). The management of academic culture: Notes on the management of meaning and social integration.Higher Education, 11, 303–320.Google Scholar
  17. Dill, D.D. & Friedman, C.P. (1979). An analysis of frameworks for research on innovation and change in higher education.Review of Educational Research, 49, 411–435.Google Scholar
  18. Etzioni, A. (1968).The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Faculty Consultative Committee of the University of Minnesota Faculty Senate. (1988). What we've learned: New public relations strategies.Footnotes, 2(7), November 22. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  20. Foresight Task Force. (1983).Foresight in the Private Sector: How Can the Government Use it? Report to Dr. Ralph E. Bledsoe, Special Assistant to the President of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  21. Goodman, P.S., Bazerman, M., & Conlon, M. (1980). Institutionalization of planned organizational change. In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Volume 2 (pp. 215–246). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hambrick, D.C. (1983). Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types.Academy of Management Journal, 26, 5–26.Google Scholar
  23. Hearn, J.C. (1988). Strategy and resources: Economic issues in strategic planning and management in higher education. In J. Smart (Ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Volume IV (pp. 212–281). New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  24. Hearn, J.C. & Corcoran, M. (1988). Factors behind the proliferation of the institutional research enterprise.Journal of Higher Education, 59(6), 634–651.Google Scholar
  25. Hearn, J.C. & Heydinger, R.B. (1985). Scanning the external environment of a university: Objectives, constraints, and possibilities.Journal of Higher Education, 56(4), 419–445.Google Scholar
  26. Heydinger, R.B. (1982). Using program priorities to make retrenchment decisions: The case of the University of Minnesota. Atlanta: Southern Regional Education Board.Google Scholar
  27. Heydinger, R.B. (1984). Using external information in planning. In M. Waggoner, R.L. Alfred, & M.W. Peterson (Eds.),Academic Renewal: Advancing Higher Education Toward the Nineties (pp. 29–38). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  28. Heydinger, R.B. (1992). Issues management: Beyond the crystal ball.CASE Currents, January, 25–28.Google Scholar
  29. Heydinger, R.B. & Zentner, R.D. (1983). Multiple scenario analysis: Introducing uncertainty into the planning process. In J.L. Morrison, W.L. Renfro, and W.I. Boucher (Eds.), Applying methods and techniques of futures research (pp. 51–68).New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 39. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Jain, S. (1984). Environmental scanning in U.S. corporations.Long Range Planning, 17(2), 117–128.Google Scholar
  31. Keller, G. (1983).Academic Strategy: The Management Revolution in American Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  32. Kotler, P. (1982).Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Kotier, P. & Murphy, P. (1981). Strategic planning in higher education.Journal of Higher Education, 52 (September/October), 470–489.Google Scholar
  34. Lederman, D. (1988). After a 9-month series of public relations debacles, U. of Minnesota officials strive to pick up the pieces.Chronicle of Higher Education, October 12, XXXV, pp. A1, A16–A17.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, P. (1988). Environmental scanning: Watching the people who are watching the university. Unpublished paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, July.Google Scholar
  36. Louis, K.S. (1989). Surviving institutional change: Reflections on curriculum reform in universities. In Carol Pazendak (Ed.), Improving undergraduate education in large universities (pp. 9–25).New Directions for Higher Education, no. 66. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Lozier, G.G. & Chittipeddi, K. (1986). Issues management in strategic planning.Research in Higher Education, 24, 3–14.Google Scholar
  38. Masland, A.T. (1985). Organizational culture in the study of higher education.Review of Higher Education, 8(2), 157–168.Google Scholar
  39. McMillen, L. (1988). On many campuses, ‘strategic planning’ leads to streamlined programs and new images.Chronicle of Higher Education, January 27, XXXIV, pages A15-A17.Google Scholar
  40. Miles, R.E. & Snow, C.C. (1978).Organizational Strategy: Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Milliken, F.J. (1990). Perceiving and interpreting environmental change: An examination of college administrators' interpretation of changing demographics.Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 42–63.Google Scholar
  42. Mims, R.S. (1980). Resource allocation: Stopgap or support for academic planning? In R.B. Heydinger (Ed.). Academic planning for the 1980s (pp. 57–72).New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 28. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  43. Morcol, G. & McLaughlin, G.W. (1990). Path analysis and residual plotting as methods of environmental scanning in higher education: An illustration with applications and enrollments.Research in Higher Education, 31(6), 555–572.Google Scholar
  44. Morrison, J.L. (1987). Establishing an environmental scanning system to augment college and university planning.Planning in Higher Education, 15, 7–22.Google Scholar
  45. Morrison, J.L. & Brock, D.M. (1991). Organizational planning and policy analysis: Combining theory and experiential learning.Innovative Higher Education, 15(2), 137–151.Google Scholar
  46. Morrison, J.L. & T.V. Mecca. (1989). Managing uncertainty: Environmental analysis/forecasting in academic planning. In J. Smart (Ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Volume V (pp. 354–390). New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  47. Morrison, J.L., Renfro, W.L., & Boucher, W.F. (Eds.). (1983). Applying methods and techniques of futures research.New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 39. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  48. Morrison, J.L., Renfro, W.L., & Boucher, W.F. (Eds.). (1984). Futures research and the strategic planning process: Implications for higher education.AS HE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report No. 9. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  49. Perrow, C. (1986).Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. Third edition. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  50. Peters, T. & Waterman, R. (1982).In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  51. Peterson, M.W. (Ed.). (1987).Key Resources on Higher Education Governance, Management, and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  52. Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. (1978).The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  53. Ring, P.S. (1988). The strategic environment: A reconceptualization. Discussion Paper #91 of the Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, May.Google Scholar
  54. Scott, W.R. (1981).Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  55. Simpson, E., McGinty, D., & Morrison, J.L. (1987). Environmental scanning at the Georgia Center for Continuing Education: A progress report.Continuing Higher Education Review, Autumn, 1–20.Google Scholar
  56. Stubbert, C. (1982). Are environmental scanning units effective?Long Range Planning, 15, 139–145.Google Scholar
  57. Thomas, P.S. (1980). Environmental scanning: The state of the art.Long Range Planning, 13, 20–25.Google Scholar
  58. Thompson, J. (1967).Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  59. Tushman, M.L. & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In L.L. Cummings (Ed.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Volume 7 (pp. 171–222). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  60. Van De Ven, A.H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation.Management Science, 32(5), 590–606.Google Scholar
  61. Weick, K. (1977). Repunctuating the problem. In P.S. Goodman, M. Pennings, & Associates (Ed.),New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness (pp. 193–225). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  62. Weick, K. (1978). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems.Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 541–552.Google Scholar
  63. Weick, K. (1979).The Social Psychology of Organizing. Second edition. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  64. Wilson, I. (1983). The benefits of environmental analysis. In K.J. Albert (Ed.),The Strategic Management Handbook (pp. 91–119). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • James C. Hearn
    • 1
  • Richard M. Clugston
    • 2
    • 3
  • Richard B. Heydinger
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Institute of Higher Education of the University of GeorgiaUSA
  2. 2.Center for Respect of Life and EnvironmentWashington, D.C.
  3. 3.Higher Education from the University of MinnesotaUSA
  4. 4.College of Education at the University of MinnesotaUSA
  5. 5.Alliance for Higher EducationUSA

Personalised recommendations