Standardized acquisition of bedside data: The IEEE P1073 medical information bus

  • M. Michael Shabot
Article

Abstract

The absence of standards for medical device communications has stymied the acceptance and success of automated clinical data management systems. Even devices with simple RS-232 data output ports require special interfacing hardware and software. Due to the number and variety of medical devices available, each with their own peculiar data output configuration, it has been impractical to interface with most of them. Limited by manual data entry, most computerized patient data management systems have failed to deliver the productivity gains their users expected.

The forthcoming IEEE P1073 Medical Information Bus (MIB) Standard promises to correct this situation with a single powerful bedside device interface method. The MIB will provide specifications for all hardware and software necessary for medical data communications. The MIB handles the need for automatic recognition of new devices placed at a bedside, automatic reconfiguration of the network, binding of a device to a particular patient's bedside and many other issues unique to the medical data communications environment. The MIB is expected to undergo formal IEEE balloting in 1990 and promises to open a new era in data management for clinical patient care.

Key words

medical information bus network computer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shabot MM, Lobue M, Leyerle BJ. An automatic PDMS interface for the Urotrack Plus 220 urimeter. Int J Clin Mon Comput 1988; 5: 125–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shubin H, Weil MH. Efficient monitoring with a digital computer of cardiovascular function id seriously ill patients. Ann Intern Med 1966; 65: 453–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Osborn JJ, Beaumont JO, Raison JC et al. Measurements and monitoring of acutely ill patients by digital computer. Surgery 1968; 64: 1057–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sheppard LC, Kouchoukos NT, Kirklin JW. The digital computer in surgical intensive care automation. Computer 1973; 6: 29–34.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shabot MM. Software for computers and calculators in critical care medicine. Software in Healthcare Feb/Mar 1985; 3: 26–39.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gardner RM, Hawley WL. Standardizing communications & networks in the ICU. Patient monitoring and data management conference. AAMI Technology Analysis and Review. 1985; TAR No. 11–85: 59–63.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gardner RM. Computerized management of intensive care patients. MD Computing Jan/Feb 1986; 3: 36–51.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hawley WL, Tariq H, Gardner RM. Clinical implementation of an automated medical information bus in an intensive care unit. SCAMC 1988; 12: 621–24.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nolan-Avila L, Paganelli B, Norden-Paul R. The medical information bus: An automated way of capturing patient data at the bedside. Computers in Nursing May/June 1988; pp. 115–121.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schwartz M. Telecommunication networks: Protocols, modeling and analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wessley Publishing Co., 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Michael Shabot
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryCedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations