Advertisement

Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 201–247 | Cite as

Population genetics of unequal crossing over

  • J. Krüger
  • F. Vogel
Article

Summary

The population genetics of unequal crossing over was examined for an infinite population with random mating. The following cases were considered:
  1. 1.

    There is an initial portion of duplicated genes which offer the opportunity for unequal crossing over, but the primary event leading to the duplication does not occur any more (model 1a).

     
  2. 2.

    This primary event occurs with a certain (small) probability (model 1b). For both possibilities the long-term consequences for the distribution of “alleles” (i.e. the single gene, the duplicated gene, the triplicated gene etc.) were considered with the following additional assumptions:

     
  1. 1.

    No selection.

     
  2. 2.

    Selection with maximum fitness for an optimum “allele length” (i.e. number of gene repeats).

     
  3. 3.

    For model 1a, selection with general advantage of longer alleles over shorter ones was also examined.

     

The results are briefly the following: In model 1a under assumption 1 the distribution of allele length tends with increasing generation number to a stationary state which depends on the initial allele distribution (i.e. on the initial frequency of the duplicated gene) but not on the frequency, P, of unequal crossing over; the stationary frequencies of the alleles decrease with increasing allele length. Under assumption 2 there is likewise a stationary allele distribution, but this depends on P as on the strength of selection and not on the initial allele distribution; it is concentrated more or less tightly around the optimal allele length. Under assumption 3 no stationary state seems to be reached: the mean and the standard deviation of the allele distribution increase steadily with the generation number. In model 1b under assumption 1, with certainty no stationary distribution exists. Under assumption 2 the situation is the same as that in model 1a; the stationary distribution of allele length is identical with that in model 1a for the same P and same selection strength, quite independent of the probability of the primary event.

The results were discussed with respect to empirical examples in which unequal crossing over is expected to be important, for example human haptoglobins, immune globulin determining cistrons, and nucleolus organizer regions. The consequences of selection relaxation were considered.

Key words

Crossing over Unequal Crossing over Gene Duplication Selection Relaxation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Black,J.A., Dixon,G.H. (1968). Amino acid sequence of the alpha chains of human haptoglobins and their possible relation to the immunoglobin light chains. Nature 218, 736Google Scholar
  2. Bridges,C.B. (1936). The bar “gene”, a duplication. Sci. 83, 210Google Scholar
  3. Britten,R.J., Kohne,D.E. (1968). Repeated sequences in DNA. Sci. 161, 529Google Scholar
  4. Bross, K., Krone,W. (1972). On the number of ribosomal RNA genes in man. Humangenetik 14, 137Google Scholar
  5. Crow,J. F., Kimura,M. (1970). An introduction to population genetics theory. New York-Evanstone-London: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
  6. Dayhoff,M.O. (1972). Atlas of protein sequence and structure, Vol. 5. Silver Spring, Maryland: Nat. Biomed. Res. Found.Google Scholar
  7. Delovitch, T.L., Baglioni,C. (1973). Estimation of light-chain gene reiteration of mouse immunoglobin by DNA-RNA hybridization. Proc.Nat.Acad.Sci. Wash. 70, 173Google Scholar
  8. Dixon,G.H. (1966). Mechanisms of protein evolution. Essays Biochem. 2, 148Google Scholar
  9. Fisher,R.A. (1922). On the dominance ratio. Proc.Roy.Soc.Edinburgh 42, 321Google Scholar
  10. Giblett,E.R. (1969). Genetic markers in human blood. Oxford-Edinburgh: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  11. Haldane,J.B.S. (1932). The causes of evolution. London: Longmans GreenGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris,H. (1970). The principles of human biochemical genetics. Amsterdam-London: North HollandGoogle Scholar
  13. Hilschmann,N., Barnikol,H.U., Hess,M., Langer, B., Ponstingl,H., Steinmetz-Kayne, M., Suter, L., Watanabe,S. (1969). Structure and formation of antibodies. In: Current problems in immunology (Bayer-Symposium I), O. Westphal, H.E.Bock, E.Grundmann, Eds., p.69. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  14. Keyl,H.G. (1966). Increase of DNA in chromosomes. In: Chromosomes today, Vol. 1, C.D.Darlington, K.R.Lewis, Eds., p.99. London: Oliver & BoydGoogle Scholar
  15. Kohne,D.E. (1970). Evolution of higher-organism DNA. Q.Rev.Biophys. 3, 327Google Scholar
  16. Lewis,E.B. (1951). Pseudoallelism and gene evolution. Cold Spring Harbor Symp.Quant.Biol. 16, 159Google Scholar
  17. Li,C.C. (1955). Population genetics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  18. May,H.G. (1917). Selection for higher and lower facet numbers in the bar-eyed race ofDrosophila and the appearance of reverse mutations. Biol.Bull. 33, 361Google Scholar
  19. Mayo,O. (1970). The role of duplications in evolution. Heredity 25, 543Google Scholar
  20. Metz,C.W. (1947). Duplication of chromosome parts as a factor in evolution. Amer.Natur. 81, 81Google Scholar
  21. Nance,W.E. (1963). Genetic control of hemoglobin synthesis. Sci. 141, 123Google Scholar
  22. Natarajan, A.T., Gropp, A. (1971). The meiotic behavior of autosomal heterochromatic segments in hedgehogs. Chromosoma (Berl.) 35, 143Google Scholar
  23. Natarajan, A.T., Sharma,R.P. (1971). Initiated uridine induced chromosome aberrations in relation to heterochromatin and nuclear organization inMicrotus agrestis L. Chromosoma (Berl.) 34, 168Google Scholar
  24. Nei,M., Kojima, K.-I., Schaffer,H.E. (1967). Frequency changes of new inversions in populations under mutation-selection equilibria. Genet. 57, 741Google Scholar
  25. Ohno,S. (1970). Evolution by gene duplication. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  26. Ohno,S. (1972). Origin, maintenance and significance of genetic polymorphism. In: The biological significance of the histocompatibility antigens. Report on a colloquium held at Titisee (Schwarzwald), October 14–15, 1971, E.Günther, E.Albert, F.Kueppers, K.Bender, Eds., Humangenetik 14, 173Google Scholar
  27. Schull,W.J., Neel,J.V. (1965). The effect of inbreeding on japanese children. New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
  28. Smithies,O. (1964). Chromosomal rearrangements and protein structure. Cold Spring Harbor Symp.Quant.Biol. 29, 309Google Scholar
  29. Smithies,O., Connell,G.E., Dixon,G.H. (1962). Chromosomal rearrangements and the evolution of haptoglobin genes. Nature 196, 232Google Scholar
  30. Spofford,J.B. (1969). Heterosis and the evolution of duplications. Amer.Natur. 103, 407Google Scholar
  31. Stephens,S.G. (1951). Possible significance of duplication in evolution. Adv.Genet. 4, 247Google Scholar
  32. Storb,U. (1972). Quantitation of immunoglobin genes by nucleid acid hybridization with RNA from myeloma and spleen microsomes. J.Immunol. 108, 755Google Scholar
  33. Sturtevant, A.H. (1925). The effects of unequal crossing over at the bar locus in drosophila. Genet. 10, 117Google Scholar
  34. Sturtevant, A.H., Morgan, T.H. (1923). Reverse mutation of the bar gene correlated with crossing over. Sci. 57, 746Google Scholar
  35. Tice,S.C. (1914). A new sex-linked character inDrosophila. Biol.Bull. 26, 221Google Scholar
  36. Wright,S. (1929). The dominance of bar over infra-bar inDrosophila. Amer. Natur. 63, 1034Google Scholar
  37. Yunis,J.J., Yasmineh,W.G. (1971). Heterochromatin, satellite DNA, and cell function. Sci. 174, 1200Google Scholar
  38. Zeleny,C. (1919). A change in the bar gene of drosophila involving further decrease in facet number and increase in dominance. J.Gen.Physiol. 2, 69Google Scholar
  39. Zeleny,C. (1921). The direction and frequency of mutation in the bar-eye series of multiple allelomorphs ofDrosophila. J.Exp.Zool. 34, 203Google Scholar
  40. Zeleny,C. (1922). The effect of selection for eye facet number in the white bar-eye race ofDrosophila melanogaster. Genet. 7, 1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Krüger
    • 1
  • F. Vogel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Anthropologie und HumangenetikUniversitätHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations