Abstract
Today it is common for business people to refer to themselves as pragmatists. There is, however, at least one significant difference between business pragmatism and traditional philosophical pragmatism: the attitude towards ethics. In this paper we discuss several approaches business pragmatists have taken toward ethics in business. We then describe the approach taken by one philosophical pragmatist, William James. We conclude that, pragmatically speaking, philosophical pragmatism is the superior view.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bird, Frederick B., and James A. Waters. 1989. “The Moral Muteness of Managers.”California Management Review Fall.
The Business Roundtable. 1988.Corporate Ethics: A Prime Business Asset February: 9–10.
Friedman, Milton. 1990. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits.”Business Ethics: Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality. Ed. W. Michael Hoffman and Jennifer Mills Moore. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hoffman, W. Michael. 1990. “The Ford Pinto.”Business Ethics: Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality. Ed. W. Michael Hoffman and Jennifer Mills Moore. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
James, William. 1974.Pragmatism. New York: New American Library.
—. 1979. “The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life.”The Will to Believe, The Works of William James. Ed. Frederick H. Burkhardt, Fredson Bowers, and Ingas K. Skrupskelis. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Suckiel, Ellen Kappy. 1982.The Pragmatic Philosophy of William James. Notre Dame: Notre Dame UP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frederick, R.E., Petry, E.S. Business ethics and philosophical pragmatism. Int J Value-Based Manage 3, 55–67 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01732413
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01732413