Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 1–14 | Cite as

Management practices of Taiwanese firms: As compared to those of American and Japanese subsidiaries in Taiwan

  • Ryh-Song Yeh


The management practices of local Taiwanese firms were evaluated by Negandhi in 1973 as the least developed as compared to those of the American and Japanese subsidiaries. Since then, the local Taiwanese firms have undergone a phenomenal change. In comparison to the American and Japanese subsidiaries, the current management practices — organisational structure, decision making and human resource management of the local Taiwanese firms are a mixture of those of the American and Japanese subsidiaries. The local Taiwanese firms have adapted very well to the impact of the West (the United States) and the East (Japan) and contributed greatly to the economic prosperity of Taiwan.


Japan United States Decision Making Resource Management Human Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abegglen, J.G. (1973),Management and Worker: The Japanese Solution, Tokyo: Sopia University.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, G.F. and Reed, A.R. (1984), “Personnel and Training Policies — Some Lessons for Western Companies,”Long Range Planning, 17, pp. 48–57.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, R.E. (1971), “The Theory of Institutionalisation: Permanent Employment and Tradition in Japan,”Economic Development and Cultural Change, 20, pp. 47–70.Google Scholar
  4. Hatvany, N. and Pucik, V. (1981), “An Integrated Management System: Lesson From the Japanese Experience,”Academy of Management Review, 6, pp. 469–480.Google Scholar
  5. Inkson, T.H.K., Pugh, D.S., and Hickson, D.J. (1970), “Organisational Context and Structure: An Abbreviated Replication,”Administrative Science Quarterly 15, pp. 318–329.Google Scholar
  6. Kerr, S. and Jemier, J.M. (1978), “Substitute For Leadership: Their Meaning and Measurement,”Organisational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, pp. 375–403.Google Scholar
  7. Lincoln, J.R., Olson, J., and Hanada, M. (1978), “Cultural Effects On Organisational Structure: The Case of Japanese Firms in The United States,”American Sociological Review, 43, pp. 829–847.Google Scholar
  8. Marsh, R.E. and Mannari, H. (1976), “Lifetime Employment in Japan: Roles, Norms, and Values,”American Journal of Sociology, 76, pp. 759–812.Google Scholar
  9. Nakane, C. (1970),Japanese Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Negandhi, A.R. (1973),Management and Economic Development: The Case of Taiwan, Martinus Ni jhoff: The Hague.Google Scholar
  11. Ouchi, W.G. (1981),Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  12. Sathe, V. (1978), “Institutional Versus Questionnaire Measure of Organisational Structure,”Academy of Management Journal 21, pp. 227–238.Google Scholar
  13. Sethi, S.P., Namiki, N. and Swanson, C.L. (1984), “The Decline of The Japanese System of Management,”California Management Review, 26(4), pp. 35–45.Google Scholar
  14. Schwind, H.F. and Peterson, R.B. (1985), “Shifting Personal Values in The Japanese Management System,”International Studies of Management and Organisation 15(2), pp. 60–74.Google Scholar
  15. Yeh, R.S. (1986),Values and Intraorganisational Influence: A Comparative Study of Taiwanese, Japanese and American Firms in Taiwan Ph.D. dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  16. Yeh, R.S. and Phatak, A. (1989), “Human Resource Management Practices of American and Japanese Subsidiaries in Taiwan”, Working Paper, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  17. Yeh, R.S. and Sagafi-nejad, T. (1987), “Organisational Characteristics of American and Japanese Firms in Taiwan,”Best Papers Proceedings the Academy of Management, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  18. Yoshino, M. (1968),Japanese Managerial System, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Zeitz, G. (1984), “Bureaucratic Role Characteristics and Member Affective Response in Organisations,”Sociological Quarterly, 25, pp. 301–318.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Faculty of Business Administration National University of Singapore 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryh-Song Yeh
    • 1
  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations