Skip to main content
Log in

The extracellular metalloprotease of serratia marcescens: 2. Comparison with trypsin and substrate specificity

  • General and Review Articles
  • a. general articles
  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The proteolytic activity of the extracellular protease ofSerratia marcescens was compared with that of trypsin on N, N-dimethyl casein. The peptides produced from exhaustive hydrolysis of alpha casein by the protease and by trypsin were of similar size as measured by gel filtration on P-10 Agarose. We conclude that the protease ofS. marcescens is an endopeptidase with trypsin-like activity on proteins, producing oligopeptides.

End group analysis of the peptides formed by theS. marcescens protease suggests that the protease has a unique substrate specificity, hydrolyzing only a peptide bond whose carboxyl group is donated by proline. The protease was inactive on the synthetic peptides with proline donating the carboxyl group, but hydrolyzed various types of natural proteins. Its narrow and novel substrate specificity makes this enzyme a potential tool for the determination of the primary structure of proteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aiyappa, P. S. and Harris, J. O., 1976. Mol. Cell Biochem. 00, 000–000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keil, B., 1971. The Enzymes (Boyer, P. D., ed.) Vol. 3, p. 250, Academic Press, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blow, D. M., 1971. The Enzymes. (Boyer, P. D., ed), Vol. 3, p. 185, Academic Press, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garg, G. and Virupaksha, T., 1970. Eur. J. Biochem. 17, 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garg, G. and Virupaksha, T., 1970. Eur. J. Biochem. 17, 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wingard, M. M. and Wolfe, R. S. 1972. J. Bacteriol. 112, 940–949.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lin, Y., Means, G. E. and Feeny, R. E., 1969. J. Biol. Chem. 244 (4) 789–793.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beale, D., 1969. Chromatographic and Electrophoretic Techniques. (In Ivor Smith (ed.)). Vol. 1, p. 000 Interscience Publishers Inc., N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Akabori, S., Ohno, K. and Narita, K., 1952. Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 25, 214–219.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bradbury, H. J., 1956. Nature (London) 178, 912–913.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ambler, P. R., 1967. Methods Enzymol. XI, 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Potts, J. T., Burger, A., Cooke, J. and Anfinsen, C. B., 1962. J. Biol. Chem. 237, 1851–1855.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McKenzie, H. A., 1967. Adv. Prot. Chem. 22, 56–221.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lehninger, A. L., 1970. Biochemistry p. 79. Worth Publishers Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hartsuck, J. and Lipscomb, W. M., 1971. The Enzymes. (Boyer, P. D., ed.), Vol. 3, p. 1, Academic Press, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rauner, R. A., Schmidt, J. J. and Najjar, V. A., 1976. Mol. Cell Biochem. 10 (2), 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aiyappa, P.S., Harris, J.O. The extracellular metalloprotease of serratia marcescens: 2. Comparison with trypsin and substrate specificity. Mol Cell Biochem 13, 131–136 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731774

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731774

Keywords

Navigation