, Volume 99, Issue 5, pp 365–370 | Cite as

Synapsis in single and double heterozygotes for partially overlapping inversions in chromosome 1 of the house mouse

  • Pavel M. Borodin
  • Ivan P. Gorlov
  • Tatyana Yu. Ladygina


Electron microscopic (EM) analysis of synaptonemal complexes (SC) in single and double heterozygotes for the partially overlapping inversions In(1)1Icg, In(1)1Rk and In(1)12Rk in chromosome 1 of the house mouse reveals that synapsis and synaptic adjustment are dependent on the size and location of the inversions and interaction between the latter. In(1)1Icg contains insertions of the inverted repeats Is(HSR;1C5)1Icg and Is(HSR;1D)2Icg and an inverted euchromatic region. Synaptic adjustment of the D-loops by shortening of the asynapsed segments of the lateral elements belonging to the insertions occurs at the late zytogene to early pachytene stage. Synaptic adjustment of the inversion loops takes place at early to late pachytene. A delay in adjustment was found in the double heterozygotes In(1)1Icg/In(1)1Rk and In(1)1Icg/In(1)12Rk. A correspondence between the lifespan of asynapsis in inverted regions and the probability of association of XY and heteromorphic bivalents was revealed.


Electron Microscopic Developmental Biology Inverted Repeat Synaptonemal Complex House Mouse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agulnik SI, Gorlov IP, Agulnik AI (1987) Mouse Chr 1 with two insertions: Is(HSR;1C5)1Icg and Is(HSR;1E3)2Icg. Mouse News Lett 78:70Google Scholar
  2. Agulnik SI, Borodin PM, Gorlov IP, Ladygina TYu, Pak SD (1990) The origin of a double insertion of homogeneously staining regions in house mouse (Mus musculus musculus). Heredity, in pressGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson LK, Stack SM, Sherman JD (1988) Synaptonemal complexes from Zea mays. I. No synaptic adjustment of inversion loops during pachytene. Chromosoma 96:295–305Google Scholar
  4. Ashley T, Moses MJ, Solari AJ (1981) Fine structure and behaviour of a pericentric inversion in the sand rat,Psammomys obesus. J Cell Sci 50:105–119Google Scholar
  5. Batanian J, Hulten MA (1987) Electron microscopic investigations of synaptonemal complexes in an infertile human male carrier of pericentric inversion inv(10) (p32q42). Hum Genet 76:81–89Google Scholar
  6. Borodin PM, Gorlov IP, Ladygina TYu (1990) Double insertion of homogeneously staining regions in Chromosome 1 of wildMus musculus musculus: effects on chromosome pairing and recombination. J Hered 81:91–95Google Scholar
  7. Chandley AC (1982) A pachytene analysis of two male-fertile paracentric inversions in Chromosome 1 of the mouse and in the male-sterile double heterozygote. Chromosoma 85:127–135Google Scholar
  8. Chandley AC, McBeath S, Speed RM, Yorston L, Hargreave TB (1987) Pericentric inversion in human chromosome 1 and the risk for male sterility. J Med Genet 24:325–334Google Scholar
  9. Davisson MT, Roderick TH (1973) Chromosomal banding patterns of two paracentric inversions in mice. Cytogenet Cell Genet 12:398–403Google Scholar
  10. Evans EP, Breckon G, Ford CD (1964) An air drying method for meiotic preparation from mamalian testes. Cytogenetics 3:289–299Google Scholar
  11. Forejt J (1974) Nonrandom association between a specific autosome and the X chromosome in meiosis of the male mouse: possible consequence of homologous centromeres separation. Cytogenet Cell Genet 13:369–383Google Scholar
  12. Forejt J (1984) X-inactivation and its role in male sterility. Chromosomes Today 8:117–127Google Scholar
  13. Forejt J, Gregorova S (1977) Meiotic studies of translocations causing male sterility in the mouse. I. Autosomal reciprocal translocations. Cytogenet Cell Genet 19:159–179Google Scholar
  14. Gabriel-Robez O, Ratomponirina C, Rumpler Y, Le Marie B, Luciani JM, Guachaoua MR (1986) Synapsis and synaptic adjustment in an infertile human male heterozygous for pericentric inversion in chromosome I. Hum Genet 72:148–152Google Scholar
  15. Greenbaum IF, Reed MJ (1984) Evidence for heterosynaptic pairing of the inverted segment in pericentric inversion heterozygotes of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus). Cytogenet Cell Genet 38:106–111Google Scholar
  16. Howell WM, Black DA (1980) Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer-regions with protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experientia 36:1014–1015Google Scholar
  17. Kaelbling M, Fechheimer NS (1985) Synaptonemal complex analysis of pericentric inversion in chromosome 2 of domestic fowl,Gallus domesticus. Cytogenet Cell genet 39:82–86Google Scholar
  18. Maguire MP (1981) A search for synaptic adjustment phenomenon in maize. Chromosoma 81:717–725Google Scholar
  19. Moses MJ (1980) New cytogenetic studies on mammalian meiosis. In: Serio M, Martini L (eds) Animal models in human reproduction. Academic Press, NY, pp 169–190Google Scholar
  20. Moses MJ, Poorman PA (1981) Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosome rearrangement II. Synaptic adjustment in a tandem duplication. Chromosoma 81:519–535Google Scholar
  21. Moses MJ, Poorman PA (1984) Synapsis, synaptic adjustment and DNA synthesis in mouse oocytes. Chromosomes Today 8:90–103Google Scholar
  22. Moses MJ, Poorman PA, Roderick TH, Davisson MT (1982) Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangement IV. Synapsis and synaptic adjustment in two paracentric inversions. Chromosoma 84:457–474Google Scholar
  23. Poorman PA, Moses MJ, Davisson MT, Roderick TH (1981a) Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements III. Cytogenetic observations on two paracentric inversions. Chromosoma 83:419–430Google Scholar
  24. Poorman PA, Moses MJ, Russell LB, Cacheiro NLA (19181b) Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements I. A tandem duplication. Chromosoma 81:507–518Google Scholar
  25. Roderick TH, Hawes NL (1974) Nineteen paracentric chromosomal inversions in mice. Genetics 76:109–117Google Scholar
  26. Saadallah N, Hulten M (1986) EM investigations of surface spread synaptonemal complexes in human male carrier of a pericentric inversion inv(13)(p12q14): the role of heterosynapsis for spermatocyte survival. Ann Hum Genet 50:369–383Google Scholar
  27. Solari AJ (1980) Synaptonemal complexes and associated structures in microspread in human spermatocytes. Chromosoma 81:99–112Google Scholar
  28. Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exptl Cell Res 75:304–306Google Scholar
  29. Tease C, Fisher G (1986) Further examination of the productionline hypothesis in mouse foetal oocytes I. Inversion heterozygotes. Chromosoma 93:447–452Google Scholar
  30. Traut W, Winking W, Adolph S (1984) An extra segment in chromosome 1 of wildMus musculus: C-band positive homogeneously staining region. Cytogenet Cell Genet 38:290–297Google Scholar
  31. Weith A, Winking H, Brackmann W, Boldyreff W, Traut W (1987) Microclones from a mouse germ line HSR detect amplification and complex rearrangements of DNA sequences. EMBO J 6:1295–1299Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pavel M. Borodin
    • 1
  • Ivan P. Gorlov
    • 1
  • Tatyana Yu. Ladygina
    • 1
  1. 1.USSR Academy of Sciences, Siberian DepartmentInstitute of Cytology and GeneticsNovosibirskUSSR

Personalised recommendations