Skip to main content
Log in

A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Some simple formulae were obtained which enable us to estimate evolutionary distances in terms of the number of nucleotide substitutions (and, also, the evolutionary rates when the divergence times are known). In comparing a pair of nucleotide sequences, we distinguish two types of differences; if homologous sites are occupied by different nucleotide bases but both are purines or both pyrimidines, the difference is called type I (or “transition” type), while, if one of the two is a purine and the other is a pyrimidine, the difference is called type II (or “transversion” type). Letting P and Q be respectively the fractions of nucleotide sites showing type I and type II differences between two sequences compared, then the evolutionary distance per site is K = — (1/2) ln {(1 — 2P — Q) }. The evolutionary rate per year is then given by k = K/(2T), where T is the time since the divergence of the two sequences. If only the third codon positions are compared, the synonymous component of the evolutionary base substitutions per site is estimated by K'S = — (1/2) ln (1 — 2P — Q). Also, formulae for standard errors were obtained. Some examples were worked out using reported globin sequences to show that synonymous substitutions occur at much higher rates than amino acid-altering substitutions in evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Efstratiadis A, Kafatos FC (1977) Cell 10:571–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Heindell HC, Liu A, Paddock GV, Studnicka GM, Salser WA (1978) Cell 15:43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed), Mammalian protein metabolism, II. New York, Academic Press, p 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1968) Nature 217:624–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1977) Nature 267:275–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1979) Sci Am 241 (No.5, Nov.):94–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M, Ohta T (1972) J Mol Evol 2:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M, Ohta T (1974) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:2848–2852

    Google Scholar 

  • King JL, Jukes TH (1969) Science 164:788–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Konkel DA, Tilghman SM, Leder P (1978) Cell 15:1125–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Marotta CA, Wilson JT, Forget BG, Weissman SM (1977) J Biol Chem 252:5040–5053

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyata T, Miyazawa S, Yasunaga T (1979) J Mol Evol 12:219–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyata T, Yasunaga T (1980) J Mol Evol 16:23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishioka Y, Leder A, Leder P (1980) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:2806–2809

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards RI, Shine J, Ullrich A, Wells JRE, Goodman HM (1979) Nucleic Acids Res 7:1137–1146

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer AS (1968) The procession of life. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanin EF, Goldberg GI, Tucker PW, Smithies O (1980). Nature 286:222–226

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ooyen A, van den Berg J, Mantel N, Weissmann C (1979) Science 206:337–344

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Additional information

Contribution No. 1330 from the National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, 411 Japan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16, 111–120 (1980).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Key words