Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 59–78 | Cite as

The auto makers and their related party transactions in indonesia

  • Roger Y. M. Tang
Articles

Abstract

This paper provides a profile of three major automobile manufacturers in Indonesia: the Astra group, the Suzuki group and the Matsubishi Krama Yudha group. Together, they control more than 85 percent of the automobile market in Indonesia. Various types of related party transactions in the auto industry and their transfer prices are also discussed. It appears that Japanese multinational companies are playing a dominant role in the development of the auto industry in Indonesia.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baranson, Jack. (1969)Automotive Industries in Developing Countries. Baltimore, Maryland: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cass, Alain. (1986) “Shake-up in Car Sector (of Indonesia) on the Way.”Financial Times, p. 10.Google Scholar
  3. England, Vaudine. (1986) “A Game of Monopoly, Jakarta's Exclusive Import Licensing Draws Fire.”Far Eastern Economic Review, pp. 52–53.Google Scholar
  4. Friedland, Jonathan. (1988) “An engine of growth—Indonesia's Astra Group aims to boost export revenue.”Far Eastern Economic Review, pp. 100–102.Google Scholar
  5. Hansen, John R., (1977) “The Motor Vehicle Industry.”Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, pp. 38–69.Google Scholar
  6. Jenkins, Rhys, (1987)Transnational Corporation and the Latin American Automobile Industry, Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kraar, Louis. (1988) “The New Powers of Asia.”Fortune, pp. 126–132.Google Scholar
  8. Kuhn, Susan E, and David J. Morrow (1989) “The International 500: The Biggest Industrial Corporations Outside The U.S.”Fortune, pp. 290–318.Google Scholar
  9. Lall, Sanjaya. (1980) “The International Automotive Industry and the Developing World.”World Development, pp. 789–812.Google Scholar
  10. Luthan, Julian. (1982) “Motor Vehicle Industry in Indonesia.” In United Nations, ESCAP, pp. 73–108.Google Scholar
  11. National Bureau of Statistics of Indonesia. (1987)Monthly Statistical Bulletin, Jakarta: The Bureau, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 1979 Committee on Fiscal Affairs.Transfer Pricing and Multinational Enterprises. Paris: the OECD.Google Scholar
  13. Robinson, Richard. (1986)Indonesia: The Rise of Capital. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin, 1986.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, Charles. (1989) “Part Exchange: Toyota Unveils ASEAN Car Components Scheme.”Far Eastern Economic Review, p. 73.Google Scholar
  15. Tang, Roger Y. W. (1988) “The Automobile Industry in Indonesia.”Columbia Journal of World Business, pp. 25–35.Google Scholar
  16. Tang, Roger Y. W., Sylvain Plasschaert, and Rienzie Weereratne. (1987)Sectoral Studies of the Petroleum, Pharmaceutical and Automotive Industries in Indonesia: A Transfer Pricing Emphasis. New York: The United Nations.Google Scholar
  17. United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations (UNCTC). (1983)Transnational Corporations in the International Auto Industry. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  18. United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Pacific (U.N. ESCAP). (1982)The Scope for South-East Asia Subregional Cooperation in the Automotive Sector. Bangkok, Thailand: ESCAP.Google Scholar
  19. Vernon, Raymond. (1986) “Multinationals are mushrooming.”Challenge, pp. 41–47.Google Scholar
  20. Wie, Thee Kian. (1984) “A Comparison of Japanese and American Direct Investment in Indonesia.”Indonesia, pp. 42–48.Google Scholar
  21. The World Bank. (1986)Indonesia Adjusting to Lower Oil Revenues. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© School of Management National University of Singapore 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Y. M. Tang
    • 1
  1. 1.Western Michigan UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations