Conclusions and Summary
There are four conclusions: (1)Solanum kurtzianum, S. simplicifolium andS. michoacanum possess an ordinary one locus system; (2) the three species ofMegistacroloba investigated are sufficiently closely allied to express, with little irregularity, a common incompatibility system; (3) several crosses involvingS. infundibuliforme, four wild species of the seriesTuberosa and certain cultivated diploids show a highly irregular expression of the incompatibility system which is much influenced by erratic female sterilities; and (4) the combinationS. simplificifolium x Phureja cultivar group shows an entirely anomalous behaviour (which is consistent in reciprocal) in which only three compatibility groups can be recognized in the approximate numerical ratio 1∶2∶1; for this there is yet no explanation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dodds, K. S. (1956).John Innes Institute Ann. Rep., pp. 19–21.
Dodds, K. S. (1958).John Innes Institute Ann. Rep., pp. 19–25.
Hawkes, J. G. (1956). A revision of the tuber-bearingSolanums.—Ann. Rep. Scottish Pl. Breed. Sta., pp. 37–109.
Pal, B. P. &Pushkarnath (1942). Genetic nature of self-and cross-incompatibility in potatoes.Nature (London) 149: 246–247.
Pandey, K. K. (1960). Self-incompatibility inSolanum megistacrobolum Bitt.Φντoν,14: 13–19.
Pushkarnath (1942). Studies on sterility in potatoes. I. The genetics of self-and cross-incompatibilities.Indian J. Genet. 2: 11–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pandey, K.K. Incompatibility in someSolanum crosses. Genetica 33, 24–30 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01725744
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01725744