Skip to main content
Log in

Interspecific hybridization inRibes

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The genusRibes, 2n=16, consisting of over 150 shrubby species has been divided byRehder into 15 sections grouped into four subgenera. Data on interspecies crosses within and between these sections and subgenera made by previous workers and at East Malling are tabulated and discussed.

Species within a section are morphologically similar and will usually cross, forming fertile hybrids; 33 such hybrids in 6 of the 15 sections are known. Inter-sectional and inter-subgeneric crosses between more unlike species often fail, but matur flowering plants have been obtained from crosses involving the following combinations: −Symphocalyx x Calobotrya, Symphocalyx x Eucoreosma, Calobotrya x Eucoreosma, Eucoreosma x Heritiera, Eucoreosma x Ribesia, Eugrossularia x Robsonia, Euberisia x Eugrossularia, Symphocalyx x Eugrossularia, Calobotrya x Eugrossularia, Eucoreosma x Eugrossularia, andRibesia x Eugrossularia. Of these, only the combinationsEugrossularia x Robsonia andCalobotrya x Eucoreosma show any fertility.

On the basis of these results, it is suggested that a more natural classification ofRibes would be to retainRehder's subgeneraBerisia, Grossularia andGrossularioides, while creating from his sevenRibesia sections, six new subgenera, viz.Microsperma, Symphocalyx, Calobotrya (comprising the sectionsCalobotrya andEucoreosma), Cerophyllum, Heritiera, andRibesia. With this classification, in the light of present knowledge, all intra-sectional hybrids are fertile, intra-subgeneric hybrids at least partially fertile, and such inter-subgeneric hybrids as can be raised are sterile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. P. (1943). Two notable plant hybrids from Alaska.Proc. Ia Acad. Sci. 50: 155–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. M. &W. Fordyce (1960). Black currant breeding.Rep. Scott. hort. Res. Inst. 7: 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1934). “The plant resources of the world as initial material in plant breeding. Botanic-ecological and economic characteristics, V. Fruits and small fruits and their wild relatives”.Lenin Acad. Agric. Sci. Inst. Plant Ind. (Leningrad) 127 pp. (InPlant Breed. Abst. 5: 250–252).

  • Bauer, R. (1955). “Resistance problems in the genusRibes and possibilities of their solution by making intra-and inter-sectional crosses”.Rep. 14th int. hort. Congr. (Scheveningen): 685–696.

  • Berger, A. (1924). A taxonomic review of currants and gooseberries.N. Y. State Agric. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 109: 118 pp.

  • Darlington, C. D. (1929). A comparative study of the chromosome complement inRibes.Genetica 11: 267–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrow, G. (1937). Improvement of currants and gooseberries.Yearb. Agric. U.S.D.A.: 534–544.

  • Himmelbaur, W. (1911). Notes on the life history ofRibes pallidum.Jb. Hamburg. wiss. Anst. 29: 151–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, L. (1930). A lethal factor inCrepis effective only in an interspecific hybrid.Genetics 15: 114–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. W. S. (1950). Small fruits: Gooseberries, Black currants.Progr. Rep. Cent. Exp. Fm. (Ottawa 1934–48: 26–30.

  • Janczewski, E. de (1907). “Monograph of the currantsRibes L.”Mem. Soc. Phys. et Hist. Nat. de Genève 35: 199–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janczewski, E. de (1910). “Supplement to the monograph of currants. I. New species and hybrids”.Bull. int. Acad. Sci. Cracovie 1909B: 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janczewski, E. de (1911). “Supplements to the monograph of currants, IV. New Hybrids”.Bull. int. Acad. Sci. Cracovie 1911B: 612–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janczewski, E. de (1917). “A hybrid between a dioecious and a hermaphrodite currant”.Bull. int. Acad. Sci. Cracovie 1916B: 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keep, E. (1958). Cytological notes.Rep. East Malling Res. Sta. 1957: 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehne, E. (1902).Ribes grossularia x nigrum (R. schneideri Maurer in litt.)Gartenflora 51: 409–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmin, A. J. (1938). “Some results of interspecific hybridization inRibes, Rubus andFragaria”. Bull. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. Ser. Biol.: 681–692.

  • Kuzmin, A. J. (1940). “The role of the intermediary plant in obtaining the first and second generation between black currant and gooseberry”.Proc. Lenin Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 5: 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmin, A. J. (1941). “The role of the intermediary in hybridizing currants with gooseberries”.Sovetskaja Botanika 1–2: 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, P. (1929). “Hybridization in the genusRibes”.Züchter 1: 66–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, J. M. (1900). HybridRibes.Gardener's Chron. 28, Ser. 3: 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meurman, O. (1928). Cytological studies in the genusRibes L.Hereditas 11: 289–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, F. (1949). Polyploids inRibes, Fragaria, Raphanus andLactuca. Proc. VIII int. Congr. Genet. (Stockholm) (Suppl.Hereditas): 34–35.

  • Nilsson, F. (1951). “Interspecific hybrids and tetraploids within the genusRibes”.Nord. Jordbr. Forskn. 31–32: 418–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, F. (1955). Amphidiploid species in the genusRibes. Rep. 14th int. hort. Congr. (Scheveningen): 697–711.

  • Nilsson, F. (1956). “Species hybrids in the genusRibes, subgenusCoreosma”.Bot. Notiser 109: 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, F. (1959). Polyploidy in the genusRibes.Genetica Agraria 11: 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova, N. M. (1940). “Initial material for the breeding and cultivation of bush fruits”.Vestnik Socialističeskogo Rastenievodstva 5: 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehder, A. (1923).J. Arnold Arbor. 4: 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehder, A. (1954).Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs. MacMillan & Co., Toronto, 996 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietsema, I. (1955). “Interspecific hybrids in the generaRibes andRubus”.Rep. 14th Int. hort. Congr. (Scheveningen): 712–715.

  • Sax, K. (1931). Chromosome numbers in the ligneous Saxifragaceae.J. Arnold Arbor. 12: 198–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbing, G. L. (1958). The inviability, weakness, and sterility of interspecific hybrids.Adv. Genetics 9: 147–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolmačev, I. A. (1940). “An experiment on overcoming incompatibility”.Jarovizacija 5(32): 125–126. (InPlant Breed. Abst.11: 321.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolmačev, I. A. (1941). “Hybrids of Crandall-currant with black currant”.Vestnik Gibridizacii 1: 115. (InPlant Breed. Abst. 12: 278.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tun, N. N. (1961).In “Pomology”by C. A. Wood.Rep. Scott. hort. Res. Instit.8: 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tydeman, H. M. (1933). Fruit breeding.Rep. East Malling Res. Sta. 1932: 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaarama, A. (1948). A triple species hybrid in the genusRibes.Hereditas (Lund) 34: 369–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaarama, A. (1949). Spindle abnormalities and variation in chromosome number inRibes nigrum.Hereditas (Lund) 35: 136–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vìksne, A. (1931). “Preliminary communication on crosses withRibes (1924–1931)”.Acta Hort. Bot. Univ. Latv. 6: 86–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (1900). The structure of certain new hybrids (Passiflora, Albuca, Ribes, Begonia).J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 24: 146–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielinski, Q. B. (1953). Chromosome numbers and meiotic studies inRibes.Bot. Gaz. 114: 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keep, E. Interspecific hybridization inRibes . Genetica 33, 1–23 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01725743

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01725743

Keywords

Navigation