Development and evaluation of a dual-pump microcomputer-based closed-loop arterial pressure control system

  • J. R. Colvin
  • G. N. C. Kenny
Article

Summary

Hypertension after cardiac surgery is common and is associated with increased morbidity. It is usually managed by the infusion of short acting vasodilators.

The use of a closed-loop computer system to control the infusion of a vasodilator has been shown to compare favourably with manual control. We have developed a closed-loop system for the ATARI 1040ST microcomputer to control arterial pressure by the simultaneous infusion of two vasodilators. The control program is based on a proportional-integral-derivative algorithm which has been adapted to allow control of two IMED 929 infusion pumps from one RS-232 port. All communication between the user and computer is carried out with a ‘mouse’, thus increasing acceptability of the system to ward staff. Cardiovascular data are collected on-line from the patient monitor via a custom-built analogue to digital convertor.

This system was used to study glyceryl trinitrate and sodium nitroprusside in 24 patients requiring vasodilators after cardiopulmonary bypass. The study showed that in 14 of the patients hypertension was controlled by GTN alone and 10 required supplementary SNP. We have demonstrated that this dual-pump automatic arterial pressure control system is a satisfactory and safe method of administering two vasodilators simultaneously. It is suitable for both routine clinical and research uses.

Key words

Closed-loop computer arterial pressure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Estafanous FG, Tarazi RC. Systemic hypertension associated with cardiac surgery. The American Journal of Cardiology 1980; 46: 685–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts AJ, Niarchos AP, Subramanian VA et al. Systemic hypertension associated with coronary artery bypass surgery. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1977; 74: 846–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fremes SE, Weisal RD, Baird RJ et al. Effects of post-operative hypertension and its treatment. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1983; 86: 47–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Viljoen Jf, Estafanous FG, Tarazi RC. Acute hypertension immediately after coronary artery surgery. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1976; 71: 548–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sheppard LC, Shotts JF, Robertson NF, Wallace FD, Kouchoukos NT. Computer controlled infusion of vasoactive drugs in post-cardiac surgical patients. The New York State Society of Anesthesiologists Inc. 35th Postgraduate Assembly 1981, Dec 12–16.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Asla RA, Benis AM, Jurado RA, Litwak RS. Management of postcardiotomy hypertension by microcomputer controlled administration of sodium nitroprusside. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1985; 89: 115–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reid JA, Kenny GNC. Evaluation of closed-loop control of arterial pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1987; 59: 247–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Colvin JR & Kenny GNC. Microcomputer controlled administration of vasodilators following cardiac surgery. J Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia: in press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaplan JA, Finlayson DC, Woodward S. Vasodilator therapy after cardiac surgery: A review of the efficacy and toxicity of nitroglycerin and nitroprusside. Canadian Anaesthetists Society Journal 1980; 27: 254–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chiariello M, Gold HK, Leinbach RC, Davis MA, Maroko PR. Comparison between the effects of nitroprusside and nitroglycerin on ischemic injury during acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1976; 54: 766–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ivankovitch AD, Miletich DJ, Tinker JH. Sodium nitroprusside: Metabolism and general considerations. International Anesthesiology Clinics 1978; 16: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaplan JA, Jones EL. Vasodilator therapy during coronary artery surgery: Comparison of nitroglycerin and nitroprusside. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1979; 77: 301–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flaherty JT, Magee PA, Gardner TL, Potter A, MacAllister NP. Comparison of intravenous nitroglycerin and sodium nitroprusside for treatment of acute hypertension developing after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 1982; 65: 1072–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheppard LC, Kouchoukos NT. Automation of measurements and interventions in the systemic care of postoperative cardiac surgical patients. Medical Instrumentation 1977; 11: 296–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Westenskow DR. Fundamentals of feedback control applied to microcomputer instrumentation design. Int J Clin Monitoring and Computing 1986; 3: 239–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Colvin JR & Kenny GNC. Automatic control of arterial pressure after cardiac surgery — Evaluation of a microcomputer based control system using glyceryl trinitrate and sodium nitroprusside. Anaesthesia; in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Colvin
    • 1
  • G. N. C. Kenny
    • 1
  1. 1.University Dept. of AnaesthesiaGlasgow Royal InfirmaryGlasgowScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations