Skip to main content
Log in

The role of EMG awareness in EMG biofeedback learning

  • Published:
Biofeedback and Self-regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Underlying most research on biofeedback learning is a theoretical model of the processes involved. The current study tested a prediction from the Awareness Model: High initial EMG awareness should facilitate response control during EMG biofeedback training. Seventy-two undergraduates were assessed for forehead EMG awareness by asking them to produce target responses from 1.0 to 5.0 µV every 15 s for 16 trials. Based on this assessment, two groups (high and low awareness) were trained for 64 trials to produce these target levels with either EMG biofeedback, practice (no feedback), or noncontingent EMG feedback. A transfer task was identical to the initial assessment. During training, the biofeedback group deviated less from target than the practice and noncontingent groups. The biofeedback group was the only group to improve from initial EMG awareness activity. During transfer, only the low awareness biofeedback group remained below initial EMG awareness level. These findings can be interpreted in terms of the Two-Process Model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, A. B. (1975). An experimental test of assumptions relating to the use of electromyographic biofeedback as a general relaxation training technique.Psychophysiology, 12, 656–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayles, G. H., & Cleary, P. J. (1986). The role of awareness in the control of frontalis muscle activity.Biological Psychology, 22, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilodeau, I. M. (1966). Information feedback. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.),Acquisition of skill. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brener, J. (1977). Sensory and perceptual determinants of voluntary visceral control. In G. E. Schwartz & J. Beatty (Eds.),Biofeedback theory and research (pp. 29–66). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T. H., & Stoyva, S. M. (1969). An instrument for producing deep muscle relaxation by means of analog information feedback.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. F. (1952).Manual of surface electromyography. Montreal: Laboratory for Psychological Studies, Allen Memorial Institute of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T. G., Gillig, S. E., Ponsor, S. E., Weil, N., & Utz, S. W. (1986). The learning process in biofeedback: Is it feedforward or feedback?Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 11, 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. H. (1990). Perception of activity in thezygomaticus major andcorrugator supercilii muscle regions.Psychophysiology, 27, 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, L. E., & Kotses, H. (1974). Experimenter and subject sex effects in the skin conductance response.Psychophysiology, 11, 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridlund, A. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Guidelines for human electromyographic research.Psychophysiology, 23, 567–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaros, A. G., & Hanson, K. (1990). EMG biofeedback and discriminative muscle control.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 15, 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstadt, L., Shapiro, D., & Whitehead, R. (1986). Blood pressure discrimination.Psychophysiology, 23, 500–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg, L., & Ashton, R. (1984). Heart rate discrimination and heart rate control: A test of Brener's theory.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2, 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harver, A., Katkin, E. S., & Bloch, E. (1993). Signal-detection outcomes on heartbeat and respiratory resistance detection tasks.Psychophysiology, 30, 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsman, R. A., O'Banion, K., Robinson, S., & Staudenmayer, H. (1975). Continuous biofeedback and discrete posttrial verbal feedback in frontalis muscle relaxation training.Psychophysiology, 12, 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. (1982).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotses, H., & Segreto-Bures, J. (1983). Subject expectancy effects in frontal EMG conditioning.Biological Psychology, 17 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix, J. M. (1981). The acquisition of autonomic control through biofeedback: The case against an afferent process and a two-process alternative.Psychophysiology, 18, 573–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, P. M., Batey, D. M., Woolfolk, R. L., Remde, A., & Garlick, T. (1988). The effect of repeated tense-release sequences on EMG and self-report of muscle tension: An evaluation of Jacobsonian and post-Jacobsonian assumptions about progressive relaxation.Psychophysiology, 25, 562–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisina, M. I. (1960). The role of orientation in the transformation of involuntary into voluntary reactions. In A V. Zaporozhets (Ed.),The development of voluntary movement. Moscow, USSR: RSFSR Academy Pedagogical Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinacci, A. A., & Horande, M. (1960). Electromyogram in neuromuscular re-education.Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society, 25, 50–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S., & Konorski, J. (1928). On a particular type of conditioned reflex.Proceedings of the Biological Society, 99 1155–1157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, R. Q., Jr., & Katkin, E. S. (1984). Placebo effects in biofeedback and self-perception of muscle tension.Psychophysiology, 21 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. D., Harver, A., & Katkin, E. S. (1990). Interoception. In J. T. Cacioppo & L. G. Tassinary (Eds.),Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements (pp. 253–291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, C., & Brener, J. (1992). The temporal locations of heartbeat sensations.Psychophysiology, 29, 535–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segreto-Bures, J., & Kotses, H. (1982). Experimenter expectancy effects in frontal EMG conditioning.Psychophysiology, 19, 467–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segreto-Bures, J., & Kotses, H. (1984). Effects of noncontingent feedback on EMG training, EMG responses, and subjective experience.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 9 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearn, D. (1961). Does the heart learn?Psychological Bulletin, 58 452–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shedivy, D. I., & Kleinman, K. M. (1977). Lack of correlation between frontalis EMG and either neck EMG or verbal ratings of tension.Psychophysiology, 14, 182–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrington, C. (1948).The integrative action of the nervous system. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sime, W. E., & DeGood, D. E. (1977). Effect of EMG biofeedback and progressive relaxation training on awareness of frontalis muscle tension.Psychophysiology, 14, 522–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1935). Two types of conditioned reflex and a pseudo type.Journal of General Psychology, 12, 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938).The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudenmayer, H., & Kinsman, R. A. (1976). Awareness during electromyographic biofeedback: Of signal or process?Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1, 191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1956). The direct estimation of sensory magnitude-loudness.American Journal of Psychology, 69, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stilson, D. W., Matus, I., & Ball, G. (1980). Relaxation and subjective estimates of muscle tension: Implications for a central efferent theory of muscle control.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 5, 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, R. E., House, J. F., & Addario, D. (1975). A comparison of biofeedback-mediated relaxation and group therapy in the treatment of chronic anxiety.American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 598–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, W. E., & Drescher, J. M. (1980). Perception of gastric contractions and self-control of gastric motility.Psychophysiology, 17, 552–558.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segreto, J. The role of EMG awareness in EMG biofeedback learning. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 20, 155–167 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01720971

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01720971

Descriptors Key words

Navigation