Skip to main content
Log in

On the process of budgeting: An empirical study of congressional appropriation

  • Published:
Papers on Non-market Decision Making Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, T. W.,An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, New York: Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, T. W., “On Asymptotic Distributions of Estimates of Parameters of Stochastic Difference Equations,”Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30 (1959), pp. 676–687.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barten, A. P., “Note on Unbiased Estimation of the Squared Multiple Correlation Coefficient,”Statistica Neerlandica, 16 (1962), pp. 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berkson, J., “Estimation by Least Squares and Maximum Likelihood,”Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium, vol. 1, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1956, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burkhead, J.,Government Budgeting, New York: Wiley, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burns, J. M. and Peltason, J. W.,Government by the People, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chow, G. C., “Tests of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions,”Econometrica, 28 (1960), pp. 591–605.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chow, G. C., “A Comparison of Alternative Estimators for Simultaneous Equations Systems,”Econometrica, 32 (1964), pp. 532–553.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G.,A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, O. A., Dempster, M. A. H., and Wildavsky, A., “A Theory of the Budgetary Process,”American Political Science Review, 60 (1966)

  11. Dempster, M. A. H., “On the Budget Process: An Empirical Study of Congressional Appropriation; 1946–1963,” (unpublished preliminary report), Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Institute of Technology, 1964.

  12. David, F. N.,Tables of the Ordinates and the Probability Integral of the Distribution of the Correlation Coefficient in Small Samples, Cambridge University Press, 1938.

  13. Durbin, J., “Estimation of Parameters in Time-series Regression Models,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 22 (1960) pp. 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fenno, R. F., “The House Appropriations Committee as a Political System: The Problem of Integration,”American Political Science Review, 56 (1962), pp. 310–324.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hotelling, H., “The Behavior of Some Standard Statistical Tests under Nonstandard Conditions,”Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium vol. 1, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1961, pp. 319–359.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hood, W. C., and Koopmans, T. C.,Studies in Econometric Method, New York: Wiley, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnston, J.,Econometric Methods, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kendall, M. G., and Stuart, A.,The Advanced Theory of Statistics, London: Griffin and Co., 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koopmans, T. C., (ed.),Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models, New York: Wiley, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lyttkens, E., “Standard Errors of Regression Coefficients in the Case of Autocorrelated Residuals,” published as chapter 3 in Rosenblatt, M. (ed.),Time Series Analysis, New York: Wiley, 1963, pp. 38–60.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mann, H. B., and Wald, A., “Linear Stochastic Difference Equations,”Econometrica, 11 (1943), pp. 173–220.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Neiswanger, W. A., and Yancey, T. A., “Parameter Estimates and Autonomous Growth,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54 (1959), 389–402.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nerlove, M., and Wallis, K. F., “Use of the Durbin-Watson Statistic in Inappropriate Situations,”Econometrica, 34 (1966), pp. 232–34.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Neumann, J. von, “Distribution of the Ration of the Mean Square Successive Difference to the Variance,”Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 12 (1941), pp. 367–395; and “A Further Remark on the Distribution of the Ratio of the Mean Square Successive Difference to the Variance,”Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 13 (1942), pp. 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peacock, A. F., and Wiseman, J.,The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rao, M. M., “Consistency and Limit Distributions of Estimators of Parameters in Explosive Stochastic Difference Equations,”Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32 (1961), pp. 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Scheffé, H.,The Analysis of Variance, New York: Wiley, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smithies, A.,The Budgetary Process in the United States, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Theil, H.,Linear Aggregation of Economic Relations, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Theil, H.,Economic Forecasts and Policy, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Theil, H., and Nagar, A. L., “Testing the Independence of Regression Disturbances,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56 (1961), pp. 793–806.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wildavsky, A.,The Politics of the Budgetary Process, Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wold, H., “Unbiased Predictors,”Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1961, p. 719.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wold, H., and Jureen, L.,Demand Analysis, New York: Wiley, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zellner, A., “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57 (1962), pp. 348–358.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

This research was sponsored by Resources for the Future. However, only the authors are responsible for any opinions reported herein, any errors, and the point of view of the paper. Although the authors are jointly responsible for the main text of the paper, Dempster has primary responsibility for the appendix. The respective institutional affiliations of the authors are: Carnegie Institute of Technology, University of Oxford, and the University of California at Berkeley.

It should be noted that references are indicated by numbers enclosed by brackets. Numbers within parentheses refer to both footnotes and equations in the text, but equations generally are indicated by a number with a decimal point.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, O.A., Dempster, M.A.H. & Wildavsky, A. On the process of budgeting: An empirical study of congressional appropriation. Public Choice 1, 63–132 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718989

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718989

Keywords

Navigation