Market structure and campaign contributions

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Commerce Clearing House.Trade Regulation Reporter. Washington, D.C.: Commerce Clearing House, 1971–1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Common Cause. “Common Cause Analysis of Contributors to the Finance Committee to Re-elect the President.” Washington, D.C.: Common Cause, September 28, 1973, as revised November 1, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. --. “Supplemental Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss.” Filed inCommon Cause vs. Finance Committee to Re-elect the President, Civil no. 1780–72 (D.D.C. June 26, 1974).

  4. ——. “Where the Special Interest Dollars Go.”In Common, 7:4 (Fall, 1976), 221–25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Common Cause Campaign Finance Monitoring Project.1972 Congressional Campaign Finances. Washington, D.C.: Common Cause, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Downs, Anthony. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.”Jour. Pol. Econ., 65 (1957), 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gujarati, Damodar. “Use of Dummy Variables in Testing for Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Linear Regression: A Generalization.”Amer. Statistician, 24:5 (December, 1970), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Olson, Mancur.The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pittman, Russell. “The Effects of Industry Concentration and Regulation on Contributions in Three 1972 U.S. Senate Campaigns.”Public Choice, 23 (Fall, 1976), 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.Input-Output Structure of the U.S. Economy: 1967. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Bureau of the Census.1970 Census of Population. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ——.Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures, 1973. Current Industrial Reports, Series MA-200(73)-2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. General Accounting Office, Office of Federal Elections.Alphabetical Listing of 1972 Presidential Campaign Receipts. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walter, Greg and Pollock, Kent. “Textile Cash for Nixon Beat Deadline.”Washington Star-News, November 25, 1973, p. A-12.

  15. Weiss, Leonard W. “Concentration and Labor Earnings.”Am. Econ. Rev., 56 (March, 1966), 96–117.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Welch, William P. “The Economics of Campaign Funds.”Public Choice, 20 (Winter, 1974), 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

The author is a graduate student in economics at the University of Wisconsin. He is very grateful to Jennifer De Toro, Ann Horowitz, James Ray, Richard Rosenberg, Roger Sherman, Gordon Tullock, and an anonymous referee for reading and commenting on an earlier draft; to John Conway and Dale Larson for suggestions and assistance concerning the data; to Randall Brown, Douglas Caves, Joseph Hotz, Bruce Kaufman, Myron Kwast, Frank Sammartino, Leonard Weiss, and James Zinser for their continuing assistance and support; and to Karen Johnson Pittman for all of the above.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pittman, R. Market structure and campaign contributions. Public Choice 31, 37–52 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718973

Download citation

Keywords

  • Public Finance
  • Market Structure
  • Campaign Contribution