Skip to main content
Log in

Reviews

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Although a more limited definition of philanthropy was employed, a similar cyclical pattern was observed in a study done by this reviewer. Also, the upward trend line in the philanthropy/GNP relationship which Dickinson observed through the forties continued through the sixties. See David B. Johnson,The Fundamental Economics of the Charity Market, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia, 1968, Appendix A. Also seeGiving, U.S.A., published annually by the American Association of Fund-Raising Council, New York.

  2. For a more thorough and analytical statement see David B. Johnson, “Some Fundamental Economics of the Charity Market,” in Thomas R. Ireland and David B. Johnson,The Economics of Charity Blacksburg, Virginia: Center for the Study of Public Choice, 1970, pp. 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Nordhaus, Wm. and Tobin, James.Economic Growth. New York: NBER, 1972. Pages 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Havard, W.C., Tullock, G., Riker, W.A. et al. Reviews. Public Choice 13, 129–147 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718858

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718858

Navigation