Skip to main content
Log in

The application of an agency decisionmaking model

  • Articles
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bain, J.; Caves, R.; and Margolis, J.Northern California's Water Industry. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J.Economic Theory and Operational Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, C. J.; Davis, R. K.; Hanke, S. H.; and Haveman, R. H. “Evaluating Federal Water Projects: A Critique of Proposed Standards.”Science 181 (August 1973), 723–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R., and March, J.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, O. “A Survey of the Theory of Pbulic Expenditures Criteria.”Public Finances: Needs, Sources and Ultization. A Conference of the Universities National Bureau Committee for Economic Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961, pp. 439–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. M. “Project Design and Evaluation with Multiple Objectives.”The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPB System, 1. Washington, D.C.: U.S.G.P.O., 1969, pp. 565–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. M., and Haveman, R. H. “Benefit-Cost Analysis and Multiple Objectives: Current Issues in Water Resource Planning.”Water Resources Research, 6 (December 1970), 1533–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. A.Business Leadership in the Large Corporation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefele, E. T.Representative Government and Environmental Management. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanke, S., and Walter, R. “Benefit-Cost Analysis Reconsidered: An Evaluation of the Mid-State Project.”Water Resources Research, 10 (October 1974), 898–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J., and Milliman, J. “Urban Water Supply—A Second Look.”Am. Econ. Rev. 57 (May 1967), 169–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, T., and Shapiro, D. “Development Versus Underdevelopment.”Growth and Change, 7 (July 1976), pp. 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leven, C. L. “A Framework for the Evaluation of Secondary Impact of Public Investments.”Am. Jour. Ag. Econ. 52 (December 1970), 723–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass, A. “Benefit-Cost Analysis: Its Relevance to Public Investment Decisions.”Quart. Jour. Econ. 80 (May 1966), 208–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— “Reply.”Quart. Jour. Econ. 81 (November 1967), 700–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, D. C. “Appraising Proposed Federal Standards for Water Resources Investment: Comment.”Science, 187 (January 1975), 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— “Benefit-Cost Ratios for Projects in Multiple Objective Investment Programs.”Water Recources Research, 5 (December 1969), 1174–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— “Discussion: Water Resources and Other Public Works.”Amer. Jour. Ag. Econ. 52 (December 1970), 731–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • --.Multiobjective Water Resource Planning. Washington, D.C.: American Geophysical Union. (Water Resources Monograph: No. 4), 1976.

  • Marglin, S. A.Public Investment Criteria. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKean, N. “Property Rights Within Government and Devices to Increase Government Efficiency.”So. Econ. Jour. 39 (October 1972), 177–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliman, J. “Economic Problems of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.”Proceedings 32nd Ann. Conf. West. Econ. Assoc., 1957, Salt Lake City, 1958, pp. 42–45.

  • Niskanen, W. A.Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M.The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, M. R., and Shelton, R. B. “A Model of Regulatory Agency Behavior.”Public Choice 20 (Winter 1974), 47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. L. “Can Public Investment Have a Positive Rate of Return?”Jour. Pol. Econ. 81 (March/April 1973), 401–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoevener, H. H. “Estimating the Effects of Water Policies in the West.”Amer. Jour. Ag. Econ., 52: 1449–54.

  • U.S. Water Resources Council. “Principles and Standards for Planning Water and Related Land Resources.”Federal Register 38 (September 1973), 1–167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

(The views expressed here do not, of course reflect the views of the agency.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapiro, D.L., Shelton, R.B. The application of an agency decisionmaking model. Public Choice 32, 51–65 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718669

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718669

Keywords

Navigation