Skip to main content
Log in

Ideology, public approval, and government behavior

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Finally, one must add that not all political cycles are caused by economic factors, and vice versa. The important point is the explicit recognition of their mutual interdependence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Åkerman, J. “Political Economic Cycles,”Kyklos. 1, (fasc. 2, 1947), 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arrow, K. J.Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bean, L. H.Ballot Behavior. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Public Affairs, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ——.How to Predict Elections. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P., and McPhee, W.Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Butler, D. E.The British General Election of 1955. London: MacMillan & Co., Ltd., 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  7. —— and Rose, R.The British General Election of 1959. London: MacMillan & Co., Ltd., 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  8. —— and King, A.The British General Election of 1964. London: MacMillian & Co., Ltd., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W. and Stokes, D.The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ——.Elections and the Political Order, Part I: The Flow of Votes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Downs, A.An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frey, B. and Lau, L. J. “Towards a Mathematical Model of Government Behavior,”Zeitschrift fűr Nationalőkonomie. 28 (Nov. 1968), 355–380.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hotelling, H. “Stability in Competition,”Econ. Jour. 39, 153 (March 1929), 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaltefleiter, W.Wirtschaft und Politik im Deutschland. Konjunkturals Bestimmungsfaktor des Parteiensystems. Koln: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Key, V. O., Jr.Politics, Parties and Pressure Groups, 5th ed. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co., 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ——.The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kramer, G. H. “A Decision-Theoretic Analysis of a Problem in Political Campaigning,” in J. L. Bernd,Mathematical Applications in Political Science. Dallas: Southern Methodist Univ. Press, 1966, 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ——--. “Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964,” paper presented at the Seventh World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Brussels, Sept. 1967.

  19. Manne, A. S. “Programming of Economic Lot Sizes,”Management Science 4, No. 2 (Jan. 1958), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ——, ed.Investments for Capacity Expansion: Plant Size, Location and Time-Phasing. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mueller, E. “Public Attitudes Towards Fiscal Programs,”Quart. Jour. Econ. 77, No. 2 (May 1963), 210–235.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pontryagin, L. S., Boltyanskii, V. G., Gamkredlidze, R. V. and Mischenko, E. F.The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Riker, W. H.The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rothenberg, J. “A Model of Economic and Political Decision-Making,” in J. Margolis, ed.,The Public Economy of Urban Communities. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, Inc., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schumpeter, J. “The Analysis of Economic Change,”Rev. Econ. Stat. 17, No. 4 (May 1935), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  26. ——Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers Pub., 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Theil, H.Economic Forecasts and Policy. Amsterdam: North Holland Pub. Co., 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tinbergen, J.Economic Policy: Principles and Design. Amsterdam: North Holland Pub. Co., 1956.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

The authors are, respectively, assistant professor of economics, Stanford University and lecturer in political economy, University of Basel. This is a revised version of a paper presented at the Winter Meeting of the Econometric Society, Evanston, Illinois, December 27–30, 1968. An early draft of this paper has benefitted from the helpful advice of Professors K. J. Arrow, D. Black, A. F. Burns, M. Kurz and A. S. Manne. Financial assistance from the Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley, for part of the research is gratefully acknowledged. Remaining errors are the responsibility of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lau, L.J., Frey, B. Ideology, public approval, and government behavior. Public Choice 10, 21–40 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718620

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718620

Keywords

Navigation