Public Choice

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 19–35 | Cite as

Donor optimization and the food stamp program

  • J. Fred Giertz
  • Dennis H. Sullivan


Public Finance Food Stamp Food Stamp Program Donor Optimization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aaron, H. and G. von Furstenberg. “The Inefficiency of Transfers in Kind: The Case of Housing Assistance.”Western Economic Journal (June, 1971), 184–191.Google Scholar
  2. Benus, J., J. Kmenta, and H. Shapiro. “The Dynamics of Household Budget Allocation to Food Expenditures.”Review of Economics and Statistics, 58 (May, 1976), 129–138.Google Scholar
  3. Browning, E. “A Comment On Distributional Externalities and In-Kind Transfers.”Public Finance Quarterly, 4(April, 1976), 245–252Google Scholar
  4. Clarkson, K. W.Food Stamps and Nutrition. Washington, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Daly, G. and J. F. Giertz. “Benevolence, Malevolence and Economic Theory.” Public Choice13 (Fall,1972),1–19.Google Scholar
  6. ——. “Welfare Economics and Welfare Reform.”American Economic Review, 62 (March, 1972), 131–138.Google Scholar
  7. Dolbear, F. T. “On the Theory of Optimum Externality.”American Economic Review, 57 (March, 1967), 90–103.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, P. “Suggestions for the Analysis of Qualitative Dependent Variables.”Public Finance Quarterly, 1 (July, 1973), 345–355.Google Scholar
  9. Garfinckel, I. “Is In-Kind Redistribution Efficient?”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87 (May, 1973), 320–330.Google Scholar
  10. Goldfarb, R. S. “Pareto Optimal Redistribution: Comment.”American Economic Review, 60 (Dec. 1970), 994–996.Google Scholar
  11. Hochman, H. M. and J. D. Rodgers. “Pareto Optimal Redistribution.”American Economic Review, 59 (September, 1969), 542–557.Google Scholar
  12. Hulett, J. R. “On the Use of Regression Analysis with a Qualitative Dependent Variable.”Public Finance Quarterly, 1 (July, 1973), 339–344.Google Scholar
  13. Kotz, N.Let Them Eat Promises: The Politics of Hunger in America. Englewood Cliffs, 1969.Google Scholar
  14. Okun, A. M.Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. Washington, 1975.Google Scholar
  15. Olsen, E. O. “Some Theorems in the Theory of Efficient Transfers.”Journal of Political Economy, 79 (January/February, 1971), 166–176.Google Scholar
  16. ——. “Subsidized Housing in a Competitive Market: Reply.”American Economic Review, 61 (March, 1971), 220–224.Google Scholar
  17. Pauly, M. “Efficiency in the Provision of Consumption Subsidies.”Kyklos, 23 (January, 1970), 33–57.Google Scholar
  18. Rodgers, J. D. “Explaining Income Redistribution.” in H. M. Hochman and G. E. Peterson, editors,Redistribution through Public Choice. New York, 1974.Google Scholar
  19. Schmidt, W. “Charitable Exploitation.”Public Choice, 6 (Spring, 1969), 103–4.Google Scholar
  20. Segal, J. A.Food for the Hungry. Baltimore, 1970.Google Scholar
  21. Thurow, L. “The Income Distribution as a Public Good”Quarterly Journal of Economics, (May, 1971), 327–334.Google Scholar
  22. Tullock, G. “The Charity of the Uncharitable.”Western Economic Journal, 9 (December, 1971), 379–392.Google Scholar
  23. ——. “Information without Profit.”Papers on Non-Market Decision Making, 1 (1966), 140–159.Google Scholar
  24. ——. “Subsidized Housing in a Competitive Market: Comment.”American Economic Review, 61 (March, 1971), 218–219.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Center for Study of Public Choice Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Fred Giertz
  • Dennis H. Sullivan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations