References
Bergstrom, T. and R. Goodman, “Private Demands for Public Goods”,Am. Econ. Rev., 63 (June, 1973), 280–296.
Borcherding, T. and R. Deacon, “The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments”,Am. Econ. Rev., 62 (December 1972), 891–901.
Greenberg, J., R. Mackay and T. N. Tideman, “Some Limitation of the Groves-Ledyard Optimal Mechanism”,Public Choice, this issue.
Groves, T. and J. O. Ledyard, “Some Limitations of Demand Revealing Processes”,Public Choice, this issue.
Hurwicz, L., “On the Existence of Allocation Systems Whose Manipulative Nash Equilibria are Pareto-Optimal”, paper given at 3rd World Congress of the Econometric Society, Toronto, August 1975.
Smith, V., “Incentive Compatible Experimental Processes for the Provision of Public Goods”, mimeo, University of Arizona, (1976).
Tidemand, T. N. and G. Tullock, “A New and Superior Principle for Collective Choice, or How to Plan”,Journal of Political Economy, Forthcoming (1976).
Tideman, T. N. and G. Tullock, “Some Limitations of Demand Revealing Processes: Comment”,Public Choice, this issue.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Groves, T., Ledyard, J.O. Reply to comments by Tidemand and Tullock and Greenberg, Mackay and Tideman on some limitations of demand revealing processes. Public Choice 29 (Suppl 2), 139–143 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718523
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718523