Public Choice

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 83–92 | Cite as

On social restriction of individual freedom

Determination of an a priori admissible set of individual activities
  • Rubin Saposnik


Public Finance Individual Freedom Social Restriction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Arrow, K. J.,Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed., New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Brege, C.,Topological Spaces, New York: Macmillan, 1963.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Buchanan, J. M. and W. C. Stubblebine, “Externality,”Economica, N.S. 29 (1962) pp. 371–84, reprinted in K. J. Arrow and T. Scitovsky, (eds.)Readings in Welfare Economics, Homewood, III.: Irwin, 1969.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Buchanan, J. M. and G. Tullock,The Calculus of Consent, Ann Arbor, Mich.: The University of Michigan Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Debreu, G., “Integration of Correspondence,”Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1965–1966.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Debreu, G., “Neighboring Economic Agents,”La Decision, Paris, 1968.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hausdorff, F.,Set Theory, New York: Chelsea, 1962.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Plott, C., “Individual Choice of a Political-Economic Process,” in Niemi, R. and H. Weisberg, (eds.),Probabilistic Models of Political Behavior, Columbus, Ohio: C. E. Merrill and Co., 1972.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Roberts, B., “An Extension of Optimality Criteria: An Axiomatic Approach to Institutional Choice,”Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973) 386–400.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Center for Study of Public Choice Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rubin Saposnik
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgia State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations