Skip to main content
Log in

Is a paretian liberal really impossible?

  • Notes
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bernholz, Peter. “Logrolling, Arrow-Paradox and Decision Rules: A Generalization.”Kyklos, XXVII (February, 1974), 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James and Tullock, Gordon.The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillinger, Claude and Lapham, Victoria. “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal: Comment by Two Who Are Unreconstructed.”Journal of Political Economy, LXXIX (November/December, 1971), 1403–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Y. K. “The Possibility of a Paretian Liberal: Impossibility Theorems and Cardinal Utility.”Journal of Political Economy, LXXIX (November/December, 1971), 1397–1402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, Alan T. and Rowley, Chalres K. “Pareto Optimality and the Political Economy of Liberalism.”Journal of Political Economy, LXXX (May/June, 1972), 476–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal.”Journal of Political Economy, LXXVIII (January, 1970), 152–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal: Reply.”Journal of Political Economy, LXXIX (November/December, 1971), 1406–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to James M. Buchanan for helpful suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernholz, P. Is a paretian liberal really impossible?. Public Choice 20, 99–107 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718180

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718180

Keywords

Navigation