Skip to main content
Log in

The probability of intransitive majority rule

An empirical study

  • Notes
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Davis, O. A., M. H. DeGroot, and M. J. Hinich. “Social Preference Orderings and Majority Rule”.Econometricia, 40 (1972), 140–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K. “Conditions for the Existence of Cycles under Majority and Non-Minority Rules.”Econometricia, 41 (1973), 889–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, D. and E. Luce. “Social Homogeneity and the Probability or Intransitive Majority Rule.”Journal of Economic Theory, 5 (1972), 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. and P. Suppes. “Preference, Utility, and Subjective Probability.”Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, edited by R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter. New York: John Wiley, 1965. pp. 249–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R. G. “The Occurrence of the Paradox of Voting in University Elections.”Public Choice 8 (1970), 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. and P. K. Pattanaik. “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Rational Choice under Majority Decision.”Journal of Economic Theory, 1 (1969), 178–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. and C. Campbell. “Computer Simulation of a Small Voting System.”Economic Journal, 80 (1970), 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. and T. Sargent. “Social Choice: A Probabilistic Approach.”Economic Journal, 77 (1967), 797–813.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

The author is Chairman, Economics and Educational Planning Group, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey 08540. The work reported here was supported by National Science Foundation Grant GS-2874-A1 to the Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, and the data upon which the results are based are available from the Editor ofPublic Choice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jamison, D.T. The probability of intransitive majority rule. Public Choice 23, 87–94 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718094

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718094

Keywords

Navigation