References
Davis, O. A., M. H. DeGroot, and M. J. Hinich. “Social Preference Orderings and Majority Rule”.Econometricia, 40 (1972), 140–157.
Fine, K. “Conditions for the Existence of Cycles under Majority and Non-Minority Rules.”Econometricia, 41 (1973), 889–899.
Jamison, D. and E. Luce. “Social Homogeneity and the Probability or Intransitive Majority Rule.”Journal of Economic Theory, 5 (1972), 79–87.
Luce, R. D. and P. Suppes. “Preference, Utility, and Subjective Probability.”Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, edited by R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter. New York: John Wiley, 1965. pp. 249–410.
Niemi, R. G. “The Occurrence of the Paradox of Voting in University Elections.”Public Choice 8 (1970), 91–100.
Sen, A.Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1970.
Sen, A. K. and P. K. Pattanaik. “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Rational Choice under Majority Decision.”Journal of Economic Theory, 1 (1969), 178–202.
Tullock, G. and C. Campbell. “Computer Simulation of a Small Voting System.”Economic Journal, 80 (1970), 97–104.
Williamson, O. and T. Sargent. “Social Choice: A Probabilistic Approach.”Economic Journal, 77 (1967), 797–813.
Additional information
The author is Chairman, Economics and Educational Planning Group, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey 08540. The work reported here was supported by National Science Foundation Grant GS-2874-A1 to the Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, and the data upon which the results are based are available from the Editor ofPublic Choice.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jamison, D.T. The probability of intransitive majority rule. Public Choice 23, 87–94 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718094
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718094