European Journal of Epidemiology

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 17–22 | Cite as

Clinical and mycological evaluation of fluconazole in the secondary prophylaxis of esophageal candidiasis in AIDS patients

An open, multicenter study
  • M. G. Agresti
  • F. de Bernardis
  • F. Mondello
  • R. Bellocco
  • G. P. Carosi
  • R. M. Caputo
  • F. Milazzo
  • F. Chiodo
  • V. Giannini
  • L. Minoli
  • L. Ortona
  • G. Pastore
  • M. Piazza
  • G. Scalise
  • A. Cirelli
  • A. Chiesi
  • D. Greco
  • S. Vella
  • A. Cassone
Article

Abstract

A prospective, multicenter, open study of fluconazole prophylaxis was performed in AIDS patients to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the drug in preventing relapses of esophageal candidiasis. To this aim, 99 AIDS patients who presented a first episode of clinically and microbiologically confirmed esophageal candidiasis were enrolled in eleven clinical centers scattered throughout the Italian territory. After resolution of this initial esophagitis, all subjects were given fluconazole, 100 mg/die, and followed up for a 6 month period. Only 7 out of the 99 patients enrolled had a relapse ofCandida esophagitis, during a mean follow-up period of 138.5 days. All relapsing patients had CD4+ cell number <100/µl at baseline. Mild side effects were reported in only eight patients. However, 14 of the 27 subjects from whom serial serum samples were available became (12) or remained (2) antigenemic during fluconazole prophylaxis, independently from relapse, suggesting the persistence of tissue-invasive, proliferatingCandida cells. Overall, the data of this study suggest a beneficial effect of prophylactic maintenance therapy with fluconazole againstCandida esophagitis, particularly in the population with >100 CD4+/µl. However, the data onCandida antigenemia in these patients invite the consideration of a relative inefficiency of the drug to eradicate the microrganism from the esophageal tissue.

Key words

AIDS Candida Candidal esophagitis Fluconazole prophylaxis Italy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Calhoum DL, Galgiani JN. The imidazoles: Miconazole, ketoconazole. Antimicrob Agents Ann 1986; 1: 218–228.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Wit S, Weerts D, Goossens H, Clumek N. Comparison of fluconazole and ketoconazole for oropharyngeal candidiasis in AIDS. Lancet 1989(i): 746–748.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Wit S, Urbain D, Rahir F, Weerts D, Clumek N. Efficacy of oral fluconazole in the treatment of AIDS — associated oesopharyngeal candidiasis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect 1991; 10: 503–505.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shadomy S, Pfaller MA. Laboratory studies with antifungal agents: Susceptibility tests and quantitation in body fluids. In Balows A, Hausler J, Herrmann KL, Isenberg MD, Shadomy JH, eds, Manual of clinical microbiology, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, Chap. 117, p. 1173.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Cutsem J, Van Gerven F, Janssen PAJ. Activity of orally, topically and parenterally administered itraconazole in the treatment of superficial and deep mycoses: Animal models. Rev Infect Dis 1987; 9 (suppl 1): 515–532.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brammer KW, Farrow PR, Faulkner JK. Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of fluconazole in humans. Rev Infect Dis 1990; 12 (suppl) 3: 318–326.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agatensi L, Franchi F, Mondello F, Bevilacqua R, Ceddia T, De Bernardis F, Cassone A. Vaginopathic and proteolyticCandida species attending a gynecologic clinic. J Clin Pathol 1991; 44: 826–830.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meyer SA, Ahearn DG, Yarrow D. GENUS 4Candida Berkhout. In: Kreger NJW, ed. The yeasts: A taxonomic study. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984: 746–747.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Venditti M, De Bernardis F, Micozzi A, Pontieri E, Chirletti P, Cassone A, Martino P. Fluconazole treatment of catheter-related right-sided endocarditis caused byCandida albicans and associated with endophthalmitis and folliculitis. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 14: 422–426.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Bernardis F, Girmenia C, Boccanera M, Adriani D, Martino P, Cassone A. The use of a monoclonal antibody in a dot-immunobinding assay for detection of a circulating mannoprotein ofCandida spp. in neutropenic patients with invasive candidiasis. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 3142–3146.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Torosantucci A, Boccanera M, Casalinuovo I, Pellegrini G, Cassone A. Differences in the antigenic expression of immunomodulatory mannoprotein constituents on yeast and mycelial forms ofCandida albicans. J Gen Microbiol 1990; 136: 1421–1428.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Working Party. Antifungal chemotherapy in patients with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. Lancet 1992; 340: 648–651.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chave JP, Francioli P, Hirschel B, Glauser MP. Single dose therapy for esophageal candidiasis with fluconazole. AIDS 1990; 4: 1033–1042.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hay RJ. Overview of studies of fluconazole in oropharyngeal candidiasis. Rev Infect Dis 1990; 12 (suppl) 3: 334–337.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wingard JR, Merz WG, Rinaldi MG, Johnson TR, Karp Je, Saral R. Increase inCandida krusei infection among patients with fluconazole. N Engl J Med 1991; 1325: 1274–1277.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dupont B, Drouhet E. Fluconazole in the management of oropharyngeal candidiasis in a predominantly HIV antibody-positive group of patients. J Med Vet Mycol 1988; 26: 67–71.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Samonis G, Rolston K, Karl C. Prophylaxis of oropharyngeal candidiasis with fluconazole. Rev Infect Dis 1990; 12 (suppl) 3: 370–373.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hay RJ. Fluconazole. J Infect 1990; 21: 1–6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grunewald TH, Sandfort J, Bergman F, Ruj B. Prevention of symptomatic candidiasis with biweekly fluconazole in HIV-infected patients. 32nd International Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Anhaeim, CA, USA, 1992: Abstract 1116.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lazar JD, Wilner KD. Drug interaction with fluconazole. Rev Infect Dis 1990; 12 (suppl) 3: 328–333.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    De Repentigny L, Reiss E. Current trends in immunodiagnosis of candidiasis and aspergillosis. Rev Infect Dis 1984; 6: 301–312.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dupont B, Improvisi L, Elaszewics M, Pialoux G, Gemo: Resistance ofCandida albicans to fluconazole in AIDS patients. 32nd International Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Anhaeim, CA, USA, 1992: Abstract 1203.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Warnock DW, Burke J, Cope NJ, Johnson EM, Von Fraunhofer NA, Williams EW. Fluconazole resistance inCandida glabrata. Lancet 1988 (ii): 1310.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. G. Agresti
    • 1
  • F. de Bernardis
    • 2
  • F. Mondello
    • 2
  • R. Bellocco
    • 3
  • G. P. Carosi
    • 4
  • R. M. Caputo
    • 5
  • F. Milazzo
    • 5
  • F. Chiodo
    • 6
  • V. Giannini
    • 7
  • L. Minoli
    • 8
  • L. Ortona
    • 9
  • G. Pastore
    • 10
  • M. Piazza
    • 11
  • G. Scalise
    • 12
  • A. Cirelli
    • 13
  • A. Chiesi
    • 1
  • D. Greco
    • 3
  • S. Vella
    • 1
  • A. Cassone
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of VirologyIstituto Superiore di SanitàItaly
  2. 2.Laboratory of Bacteriology and Medical MycologyIstituto Superiore di SanitàRomeItaly
  3. 3.Laboratory of EpidemiologyRome
  4. 4.University of BresciaItaly
  5. 5.University of MilanoItaly
  6. 6.University of BolognaItaly
  7. 7.Hospital SpallanzaniRome
  8. 8.University of PaviaItaly
  9. 9.Catholic University of RomeItaly
  10. 10.University of BariItaly
  11. 11.University of NapoliItaly
  12. 12.University of AnconaItaly
  13. 13.University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations