Abstract
The local adjunct grammars and languages have been introduced by Joshi, Kosaraju, and Yamada in response to linguistic considerations. These grammars differ fundamentally from the Chomsky phrase-structure grammars, and they generate a distinct class of languages.
In this paper, it is shown that the local adjunct languages are actually closely related to the regular and context-free languages, despite the entirely different form of definition. The adjunct languages are obtained by closure of the finite set of strings under the set operations of union, product, and a new operation, “iterated adjunction.” This method of generating adjunct languages is of exactly the same form as that of the regular sets (closure under union, product, and Kleene star) and a more recent characterization of the CFL's derived independently by several authors. In fact, iterated adjunction is obtained by a natural modification of the “iterated substitution” operation used to generate the CFL's.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. Chomsky, Formal properties of grammars,Handbook of Math. Psych., Vol. 2, pp. 323–418, Wiley, New York, 1963.
S. Ginsburg,The Mathematical Theory of Context-Free Languages, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966.
S. Ginsburg andE. H. Spanier, Bounded ALGOL-like languages,Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 113 (1964), 333–368.
S. Ginsburg andS. A. Greibach, Abstract families of languages,Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 87 (1969), 1–32.
S. A. Greibach andJ. Hopcroft, Independence of AFL operations,Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 87 (1969), 33–40.
J. Gruska, A characterization of context-free languages,J. Comp. Sys. Sci. 5 (1971), 353–364.
J. M. Hart, Ambiguity and decision problems for local adjunct languages,J. Comp. Sys. Sci. 8 (1974), 8–21.
J. M. Hart,Formal Properties of Local Adjunct Languages, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 1972.
J. E. Hopcroft andJ. D. Ullman,Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1969.
A. K. Joshi, S. R. Kosaraju, andH. M. Yamada, String adjunct grammars: I, Local and distributed adjunction,Information and Control 21 (1972), 93–116.
A. K. Joshi, S. R. Kosaraju andH. M. Yamada, String adjunct grammars: II, Equational representation, null symbols, and linguistic relevance,Information and Control 21 (1972), 235–260.
L. S. Levy,Generalized Local Adjunction and Replacement in Adjunct Languages, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 1970.
L. S. Levy, Structural aspects of local adjunct languages,Information and Control 23 (1973), 260–287.
I. P. McWhirter, Substitution expressions,J. Comp. Sys. Sci. 5 (1971), 629–637.
M. O. Rabin andD. Scott, Finite automata and their decision problems,IBM J. Res. Develop. 3 (1959), 115–125.
M. K. Yntema, Cap expressions for context-free languages,Information and Control 18 (1971), 311–318.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The material in this paper has appeared in part in the author's Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, August, 1972.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hart, J.M. Recursive generation of local adjunct languages. Math. Systems Theory 9, 315–326 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01715358
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01715358