Skip to main content
Log in

Recursive generation of local adjunct languages

  • Published:
Mathematical systems theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The local adjunct grammars and languages have been introduced by Joshi, Kosaraju, and Yamada in response to linguistic considerations. These grammars differ fundamentally from the Chomsky phrase-structure grammars, and they generate a distinct class of languages.

In this paper, it is shown that the local adjunct languages are actually closely related to the regular and context-free languages, despite the entirely different form of definition. The adjunct languages are obtained by closure of the finite set of strings under the set operations of union, product, and a new operation, “iterated adjunction.” This method of generating adjunct languages is of exactly the same form as that of the regular sets (closure under union, product, and Kleene star) and a more recent characterization of the CFL's derived independently by several authors. In fact, iterated adjunction is obtained by a natural modification of the “iterated substitution” operation used to generate the CFL's.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Chomsky, Formal properties of grammars,Handbook of Math. Psych., Vol. 2, pp. 323–418, Wiley, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Ginsburg,The Mathematical Theory of Context-Free Languages, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Ginsburg andE. H. Spanier, Bounded ALGOL-like languages,Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 113 (1964), 333–368.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Ginsburg andS. A. Greibach, Abstract families of languages,Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 87 (1969), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. A. Greibach andJ. Hopcroft, Independence of AFL operations,Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 87 (1969), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Gruska, A characterization of context-free languages,J. Comp. Sys. Sci. 5 (1971), 353–364.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. Hart, Ambiguity and decision problems for local adjunct languages,J. Comp. Sys. Sci. 8 (1974), 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. M. Hart,Formal Properties of Local Adjunct Languages, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. E. Hopcroft andJ. D. Ullman,Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. K. Joshi, S. R. Kosaraju, andH. M. Yamada, String adjunct grammars: I, Local and distributed adjunction,Information and Control 21 (1972), 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. K. Joshi, S. R. Kosaraju andH. M. Yamada, String adjunct grammars: II, Equational representation, null symbols, and linguistic relevance,Information and Control 21 (1972), 235–260.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. S. Levy,Generalized Local Adjunction and Replacement in Adjunct Languages, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. S. Levy, Structural aspects of local adjunct languages,Information and Control 23 (1973), 260–287.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. P. McWhirter, Substitution expressions,J. Comp. Sys. Sci. 5 (1971), 629–637.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. O. Rabin andD. Scott, Finite automata and their decision problems,IBM J. Res. Develop. 3 (1959), 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. K. Yntema, Cap expressions for context-free languages,Information and Control 18 (1971), 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The material in this paper has appeared in part in the author's Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, August, 1972.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hart, J.M. Recursive generation of local adjunct languages. Math. Systems Theory 9, 315–326 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01715358

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01715358

Keywords

Navigation