Abstract
A pilot-study was done to investigate the applicability of the sickness impact profile (SIP) in ex-ICU patients. For this study 221 consecutively admitted patients were reviewed retrospectively after excluding children, deceased pateints and readmissions. SIP was assessed in these patients by either interview or questionnaire. These were divided into three groups: i) Patients interviewed at home (n=26). ii) Patients receiving the SIP-questionnaire by mail (n=93). iii) As for group ii, but after receiving a telephone invitation to participate (n=102). Highest mean SIP-score was found in group i (16.3). Groups ii and iii scored 10.2 and 7.9 respectively. Analysis of variance demonstrated overall SIP-scores of these groups to be significantly different. The response in group iii (77%) was significantly higher compared to group ii (56%). Data collection in Group i appeared to be most expensive costing $13.20 per patient, followed by group iii ($3.79) and group ii ($2.56). It is concluded that the self-administered SIP is suitable for measuring outcome in ICU-patients and is much cheaper than the direct interview technique. The 3 different approaches should be considered as independent methods of which individual results cannot be compared. The response can be improved significantly by calling the patients before sending the questionnaire.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McDowell I, Newell C (1987) Measuring health. Oxford University Press, New York
Reis Miranda D, Williams A, Loirat Ph (1990) Management of intensive care: guidelines for better resource use. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Balaban DJ, Sagi PC, Goldfarb NI, Nettler S (1986) Weights for scoring the quality of well-being instrument among rheumatoid arthritics. Med Care 24:973–980
Patrick DL, Danis M, Southerland LI, Hong G (1988) Quality of life following intensive care. J Gen Intern Med 3:218–223
Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel S, Pollard WE, Gilson BS, Morris JR (1976) The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv 6:393–415
Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB Gilson BS (1981) The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 19:787–805
Luttik A, Jacobs HM, Witte de LP (1987) De sickness impact profile: Een meetinstrument, waarmee de invloed van ziekte en/of gezondheitsklachten op het dagelijks functioneren kan worden vastgesteld. Utrecht
Carter WB, Bobbitt RA, Bergner M, Gilson BS (1976) Validation of an interval scaling: The sickness impact profile. Health Serv Res 11:516–528
Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Pollard WE, Martin DP, Gilson BS (1976) The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care 14:57–67
Pollard WE, Bobbitt RA, Bergner M, Martin DP, Gilson BS (1976) The sickness impact profile: reliability of a health status measure. Med Care 14:146–155
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hulsebos, R.G., Beltman, F.W., dos Reis Miranda, D. et al. Measuring quality of life with the sickness impact profile: A pilot study. Intensive Care Med 17, 285–288 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01713939
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01713939